The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YUKISS[edit]

YUKISS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 13:32, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete via WP:V and WP:N --Numyht (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Dekkappai (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ron B. Thomson (talk) 20:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.