The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ymre Stiekema[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Ymre Stiekema (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Now that I think of it, I don't think Miss Stiekama has had a sustained career to meet NMODEL. There was a blip of controversy years ago about women getting mad that she had the perfect "bounce back" body in a Dutch stroller advertisement that was a Fox News Outnumbered segment (make of that what you will), but other than that you simply can't verify information about her. Appearance does not = notability. Trillfendi (talk) 20:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More