The result was Delete, consensus is that this article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete via WP:V and WP:N --Numyht (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Ron B. Thomson (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]