The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as G11. Jclemens (talk) 07:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zimmer dental[edit]

This article may be too self-promotional to be included. The company may well be notable, being listed on the New York Stock Exchange. However, the article appears to exist mainly to promote the company and its products. Note the registered-trademark and trademark symbols, the words 'leader' and 'renowned', and the lack of sources other than to the company's own website Richard Cavell (talk) 00:10, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zimmer, Inc. from 2005, and that Zimmer, Inc. has now been recreated. - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy G11 Looks blatantly promotional to me, would require a complete rewrite to be encyclopedic. Ray (talk) 01:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Additional note - User:Troydanderson is substantially the same content as the nominated article. - Richard Cavell (talk) 05:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as pure spam. Ditto the user page and please warn user. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: Speedy delete as a copyvio from the company's home page. The title with its lack of a capital "D" was a tipoff as were all the trademarks and lack of wikis. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.