< February 16 February 18 >

February 17

Category:Honorary graduates of the University of Exeter

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per strong consensus at 2021_January_4#Category:Honorary_graduates_of_Keele_University and previous cfds, such as here (2013), here (2019), here (2019) and here (2020). Oculi (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Temples (LDS Church) in England and Germany

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 17:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Both categories nominated for merging have just two articles in them. For the time being, there is no room for expansion as there are only two LDS temples in both countries, and temples are only rarely constructed. I suggest merging to the parents and deleting Category:Temples (LDS Church) in the United Kingdom, which contains only Category:Temples (LDS Church) in England. (There is a related discussion here.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Digital-only albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a notable enough search term - albums frequently come out in multiple formats. The format field was removed from album infobox therefore the purpose of having this category is now questionable. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films scored by Aryan Ashik

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category about a person whose article was deleted. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 05:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 21:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

People from Heraklion (regional unit)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, this concerns categorization by 3rd and 4th level administrative divisions of Greece, leading to a endless series of single-article or 2-article categories. The proposal is to merge to 2nd level administrative division, except cities and larger towns, in this case except Heraklion (151,000 people). This is follow-up on this earlier nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

People from Imathia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, this concerns categorization by 3rd and 4th level administrative divisions of Greece, leading to a endless series of single-article or 2-article categories. The proposal is to merge to 2nd level administrative division, except cities and larger towns, in this case except Veria (48,000 people), Naousa, Imathia (19,000 people) and Alexandreia, Greece (16,000 people). This is follow-up on this earlier nomination. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Saturn Award for Best Film winners

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Saturn Award for Best Film winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and its subcategories:
Nominator's rationale: There seems to be a recent trend to create navboxes and categories for winners of every category from every award in the entertainment industry of late, which is leading to template clutter and overcategorization. I'm nominating this batch as failing WP:OCAWARD. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is somewhat of a follow-up of an earlier CfD that began here. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about whether the award is notable but whether winning the award, however notable it may be, is a defining aspect of the film per WP:DEFINING. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Album chart usages for Canadian Albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category has been marked to not delete even if empty, but I'm not sure what it is used for. Template:Album chart has usages for the RPM and Billboard versions of the chart (see Category:Album chart usages for Canada and Category:Album chart usages for BillboardCanada, respectively), with the transition occurring in late 1996 according to the List of number-one albums of 1996 (Canada). Perhaps a correction was made that emptied this category and entries moved to one of the other two. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Order of Danica Hrvatska recipients

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Listifying/Deleting Category:Order of Danica Hrvatska recipients
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEFINING (initially WP:OVERLAPCAT and later WP:OCAWARD)
According to the main article, the Order of Danica Hrvatska is the 14th most important medal in Croatia and the articles treat it like the 14th most important award, mentioning it only in passing. The award is given out for many reasons and the 4 articles consist of a war hero, a sculptor, an entrepreneur, and a theologian, so there is no common thread that could aid navigation. There wasn't a list so I created one right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Neshan-e Aqdas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Listifying/Deleting Category:Recipients of the Neshan-e Aqdas
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEFINING (WP:OCAWARD and WP:OVERLAPCAT)
The Neshan-e Aqdas was an award from the Qajar dynasty of Iran given to both domestic and foreign recipients. 4 of the 6 articles here were given to themselves and are already somewhere under Category:Qajar dynasty. The other 2 articles are Khazʽal Ibn Jabir and Amanullah Khan, one of which mentions the award in the lede and the other not at all, so it doesn't seem generally defining. There wasn't a list so I created one right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 02:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jewish women cinematographers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-entry category for a non-defining characteristic. The intersection of gender with occupation is appropriate, as this is an occupation where women have historically been underrepresented (and to some extent still are today), but triple-intersecting that with Jewishness isn't of any particular significance — as witness the fact that there isn't a parent category for Category:Jewish cinematographers, and the fact that this category has existed for almost six years without ever having a second woman actually added to it even though there are surely other Jewish women in this field. Bearcat (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More