January 26
Category:Free biology software
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic London 09:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm a bit astonished that there should exist no free biology sw. Maybe some of them have not yet be found in the depths of Wikipedia? If so, hurry and populate this category. --Just N. (talk) 20:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per nom. If there are no more entries this is a clear case of SMALLCAT case rule. --Just N. (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge agree with the reasoning from User:Marcocapelle and User:Justus Nussbaum GavriilaDmitriev (talk • they/them) 17:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rugby players in Scotland by council area
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure). Follow-up see this discussion Marcocapelle (talk) 09:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: These give the rather misleading impression that some of the subcategories are for municipal rugby league players. Rathfelder (talk) 19:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Filipino press secretaries
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge per Marcocapelle. For the record, the two sub-cats are also in Category:Members of the Presidential Communications Group of the Philippines. – Fayenatic London 09:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: There's only one "Filipino press secretary" at any time, which is at Category:Secretaries of the Presidential Communications Office of the Philippines. Presidential spokespersons are another office, and sometimes co-exist with the secretary of the Presidential Communications Office. The secretary, whenever there is a presidential spokesperson, is a "behind-the-scenes" person, while the presidential spokesperson is the one you'd always see on TV. Howard the Duck (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.