Deletion review archives: 2011 February

15 February 2011

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Ctrl+Alt+Del (webcomic) (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

In the debate, consensus decided to remove the article, pointing out a lack of sources, and lack of NPOV because of "ownership" of the article. These issues have not changed, but one of the "owners" has simply restored the article afterwards. I believe that speedy deletion (G4 / recreated article) would apply, but since not everybody agrees, I'm bringing it here. It seems logical that either the deletion should be overturned, or the article should actually be removed. In my opinion the latter is preferable because the article has had the same issues for years. 17:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.93.68.91 (talk)

  • Retain article-This diff, comparing the current version with the one immediately before it was redirected as a result of the AfD, shows the article has changed substantially, so G4 doesn't apply. Anyone is free to start a new AfD if they wish, of course.--Fyre2387 (talkcontribs) 20:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Send to AfD- G4 technically doesn't apply, but most of the issues that plagued it last time are still evident. Reyk YO! 21:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • List at AfD not a speedy at this point. Hobit (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • List at AfD Look, G4 is only for things where no one with a clue about our policy will object to speedy deletion in good faith. That's not the case here, so off to AfD it goes. Jclemens (talk) 01:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.