The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic nonsense. Article is about to be delted. No use or purpose. No copyright tag. Probably the worst picture on Wikipedia right now. No brainer.--tHeMaNe2Talk 10:33, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep - portrait of dead person with no reasonable expectation of creating a free equivalent. What the source says about usage terms has no bearing on our decisions unless they actually send a takedown notice. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-free photo from a notable rabbi copied from a website that claims copyright and does not welcomes non-personal uses of their work. The website uses the image to illustrate that rabbi. Since we also use as an illustration of that rabbi, our use is not transformative and we hardly have a fair use case here. (before voting please, note that the fact that this guy is dead, that the image is low-res or that the image is relevant to the article has nothing to do with this nomination). Damiens.rf 00:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No source. Damiens.rf 00:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free book cover for a non-notable book, actually being used as an illustration for the author. Damiens.rf 00:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality, orphaned, lacking any identification of the subject or the location. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently a TV tower? No indication of location, subject, if it is what I think it is, is poorly framed. Orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:47, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep Wknight94 talk 13:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of location, low quality, orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of subject/location. Low quality/overexposed. Orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No description to indicate where this was taken, no response to request for clarification (asked two months ago). Generic nature of image and lack of location leave this unusable. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:37, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Wouldn't be surprised if this turned out to be a copy-vio as well. Acather96 (talk) 06:58, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Wouldn't be surprised if this turned out to be a copy-vio as well Acather96 (talk) 07:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, wouldn't be surprised if this turned out to be a copy-vio. Acather96 (talk) 07:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 07:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to awful quality. Acather96 (talk) 07:06, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to awful quality. Acather96 (talk) 07:07, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to awful quality Acather96 (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible copyright problems. Acather96 (talk) 07:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 07:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 07:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible copyright problems. Acather96 (talk) 07:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 07:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality. Acather96 (talk) 07:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality, unidentifiable location. Acather96 (talk) 07:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 07:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 07:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Four random notes composed in a MIDI. No encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject. Possible copyright problems as well. Acather96 (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible copyright problems. Acather96 (talk) 10:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, possible copyright problems - the "image" is a bunch of promotional advert text. Acather96 (talk) 10:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifibale subject. Acather96 (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:32, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:33, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject, possible copyright problems. Acather96 (talk) 10:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject, possible copyright problems. Acather96 (talk) 10:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by JohnCD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free photograph of a river during a flooding, with a destroyed road near its banks. Was kept by an admin during an informal fair-use review in 2007. Questionable both on grounds of NFCC#1 (according to the article, flood damage is a regular, annual occurrence, so new photographs of similar scenes could be made) and NFCC#8 (the particular event of damage shown here, i.e. the destruction of a particular road in a particular year, can be understood without visual illustration). Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:39, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 10:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:47, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 10:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic, unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 11:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 11:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 11:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, File is the image of a non free logo. It has been replaced by the original logo. Logo IIT Ropar.jpg Rohit Agarwal (talk) 12:16, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete via G7 lifebaka++ 14:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not transcluded on any page or linked to from anywhere on-wiki. Since most of the content is either in Millers Point, New South Wales or that page's history, I don't think we need to have this image taking up space in categories. (if there is any objection, I withdraw my !vote for deletion... the image doesn't violate copyright or anything, so I don't really care what happens to it). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:24, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Largely decorative non-free image. Using an image (c) Sky One without commentary about the image itself to illustrate the article on a fictional character by Pratchett is not justifiable. This image fails to significantly add to reader's understanding of the topic, and perhaps my fall into one of the unacceptable use categories of WP:NFC Peripitus (Talk) 22:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Largely decorative non-free image. Using an image (c) B Syk B without commentary about the image itself to illustrate the article on a fictional character by Pratchett is not justifiable. This image fails to significantly add to reader's understanding of the topic, and perhaps my fall into one of the unacceptable use categories of WP:NFC Peripitus (Talk) 22:37, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unnecessary non-free image. It is ridiculous to suppose that we need to see an image of a person to understand they announced something. Fails to, in any significant way, increase reader's understanding of the topic. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 22:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose deletion The image meets all WP:NFCC criteria. There is no free equivalent. It does not impair the commercial value of the original. Its use is minimal, cropped, and low resolution. It was previously published. It illustrates a very well sourced and notable article. It is used in no more than one article. As for context, it depicts not just 'somebody announcing something,' but the principal actor herself publicly putting the controversy to end. It is not used in a gallery or other restricted location, and it meets all description page requirements. μηδείς (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not quite sure how fair this supposed loose it or use it policy is - am I supposed to edit war with a single editor in order to make sure the image is not deleted? The image was indeed used, see the article history. Likewise, the guideline does not say "nontrivial historical event", does it?
In any case, video is now available of the act in question, so the image is not necessary to show the nature of the event. Feel free to delete the image immediately with my blessing. μηδείς (talk) 15:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Relevant to the article. --Hadal (talk) 23:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
why do we need to see an image of Bin Laden to understand he....what...watched TV ? Rationale claims that this image makes a significant contribution to reader's understanding of the article....To this I have to say bollocks. The image is purely decorative and fails WP:NFCC#8 handily - Peripitus (Talk) 22:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: deleted, orphaned. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non-free image that shows nothing of significance that we could not cover with a combination of free text and the existing free images of Bin Laden . Image does not add anything of use to reader's understanding (noone needs to see this image to understand him standing in front of a sheet) - fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]