The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IPhone 4S status bar.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Esebi95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails minimal use requirement, since the status bar is also in the screenshot in the infobox. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While this particular file exhibits characteristics lacking in the infobox screenshot, I don't believe that it satisfies WP:NFCC #8 and significantly increases a reader's understanding of the iOS features. Meph^talk 12:54, 3 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:EssayImageAction.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chinaman88 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Exists on commons, cannot be deleted as F8 due to different file format - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EssayImageAction.png Bulwersator (talk) 06:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:EssayImageAction2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chinaman88 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Exists on commons, cannot be deleted as F8 due to different file format - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EssayImageAction2.png Bulwersator (talk) 06:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RedpillMatrix.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Autonova (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I have no issue at all visualising two upturned hands, one with a red pill and one with a blue. Image can easily be described in text alone, sufficient that reader's understanding would not be significantly harmed. Unneccesary non-free image that fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 12:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture of Vidhya Yadav.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Srikkanthqa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The picture shows a living person, so it's entirely possible for a free alternative to be created. CtP (t • c) 15:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - all of these logos are discussed in the article, and a textual description based off the previous logo would be utterly byzantine ("there were four logos with similar appearance, they had a background color of sky blue, orange-red (etc.).") Magog the Ogre (talk•edits) 07:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:All London 2012 logos.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stepshep (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Utterly fails WP:NFCC #3: having five different images in addition to File:London Olympics 2012 logo.svg is completely unnecessary. RJaguar3 | u | t 21:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Disagree as they are all official logos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.9.151.254 (talk) 22:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Official logos. Why delete? Qantasplanes (talk) 23:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• See WP:NFCC 3a and 3b:

“

Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information...An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice.

”

RJaguar3 | u | t 02:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Those "five different images" are all official variants of the official logo - thus they are all relevant. The information that they convey is the fact that there are so many official variants and what they look like - one of them cannot in fact "convey equivalent significant information" thus they do not violate 3a or 3b. Roger (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep These multiple variations are complete in compliance with WP:NFCC #3. The point is to show the variations in the logo, so showing only one version does not convey equivalent information. --Crunch (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep These images still are all official logos. What is gained by deleting them, and what is lost by keeping them? --Interest=phine (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Compliance with WP:NFCC is a distinct issue from whether the images are useful. WP:NFCC bars the use of nonfree images that do not comply with all 10 points, even those images that may have positive effect on the quality of the encyclopedia. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • You have not convinced anyone else that it does not comply with all 10 points: (3a) This is not multiple instances of a single item, it is in fact a single instance of multiple items (it's all one image of five different logos, not 5 separate images of one logo). (3b) is about not using a high resolution copy - not relevant here. Roger (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, they are five separate logos. – Acdx (talk) 11:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the separate colours represent very minor differences in an overall theme but important differences nonetheless. – User:JD (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.220.101 (talk) [reply]
• Keep per Crunch. I went to the 2012 Summer Olympics article specifically looking for information on the logo, and these colors simply couldn't be described by text alone, I don't think. There's also a feeling of completeness in seeing the whole set. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:13, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Please close per WP:SNOW Roger (talk) 08:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, obviously. Fails WP:NFG: non-free images are not allowed in galleries, and here we have a gallery of five images. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per JD. Those images are variant official logos of the B&W version, plus the Paralympics logo. What does this have to lose? Fair use? TruPepitoM (talk) 04:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.