The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Owl City Good Time screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blurfan1995 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not critically discussed. MaRAno ^FAN 08:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blank Space screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MaranoFan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8, presence of just the faces of two living persons, for whom free images are readily available in commons, does not help in reader's understanding of the importance of adding a non-free image. And it especially fails the purpose of the rationale for the same reason. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep - I have uploaded a new version of the file demonstrating the video's setting, also making this deletion rationale defunct. MaRAno ^FAN 15:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • This still doesn't solve the NFCC#8 issue. Taylor Swift and Sean O'Pry riding a horse is something that is completely relegated by words and does not need a non-free image for visual identification. I suggest you go through the policy. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, image is not essential to readers' understanding of the article. Stifle (talk) 09:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Born to Heal.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LegereScire (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The use of a non-free book cover is normally only acceptable in an article about the book itself and not in an article about the author. See WP:NFC#UUI #9. Maybe the copyright holder would freely licence the book cover and provide verification by following the procedure found at WP:CONSENT. ww2censor (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragons of Winter Night book cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ddcc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant extra cover, see WP:NFCC#3. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• agree - we have the first edition cover which we prefer, nothing to indicate later issued versions were specifically noted by anyone as being particularly commentworthy. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 09:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Co-operative Insurance logo.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chrisieboy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Superceded by File:The Co-operative Insurance.png. Cloudbound (talk) 22:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dj Ajm jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sepulcroide (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

UE: self-portrait used only in autobiographical page deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sepulcroide/sandbox. JohnCD (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as failing WP:NFCC#3a. The image is essentially 4 different non-free images and so each and every image has to be shown to significantly add to reader's understanding of the article's topic. - Peripitus (Talk) 09:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BiS - IDOL is DEAD - all covers.jpg.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fudobrain (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG: collage of non-free images. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've seen images exactly like this (one image containing multiple album covers) still being used in wikipedia. Each release is different, and compared to western music scenes, the Japanese music scene values artwork and such highly. The artwork does not simply show a different "disc", it shows one completely different version of the release. This isn't a discography because we're talking about the same release. Even if it is a "collage", in this case it should be acceptable, as it saves space, and at the same time succeeds in portraying the different versions, which is important in the Japanese music scene. It's not as if it's a collage of non free images all belonging to different copyright holders and authors. They all come from the same source and have the same copyright holder. Fudobrain (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need sourced critical discussion about each of the extra covers if you want to include them. This sourced critical discussion is currently not present in the article.

You also need to read WP:NFG: "Within the scope of NFCC#3a, such montages [user-created montages] are considered as multiple non-free images based on each non-free image that contributes towards the montage." --Stefan2 (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not 100% sure about what you mean by "critical discussion", but how about now? As for the sourcing of the individual images used, they all come from the same page anyway, so it's just one link. Fudobrain (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, irredeemably fails WP:NFCC#3. Stifle (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How does it "Irredeemably" fail that criteria? I don't think that just showing one of the multiple cover types would suffice. Fudobrain (talk) 11:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elliot Lake Bobcats.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DMighton (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC#3: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Logo is from when organization played in a different town and under a different moniker and is historically relevant to the article. The logo is in no way a variant of the current team logo and offers relevant information to the article. DMighton (talk) 23:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFCC#8: there is no explanation as to how the former logo is relevant to the team. Due to WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8, you typically need to include sourced critical discussion about any extra logos you wish to use in addition to the main logo in the infobox. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.