The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corvette wings logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rfc1394 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is stated to be a logo but is in fact a collage of logos being used in the infobox for identification. The use of a single logo in the infobox would be acceptable but the use of multiple logos even if it is in a single image runs afoul of WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 13:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stranded naufragos cast.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mlindroo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This "cast photo" is a composite of three different scenes used in the Cast section of Stranded (2001 film). The fair use rationale states its purpose is "The image is used for identification of the main actors that appear in the movie, i.e. in the context of critical commentary of the movie. The image is placed in the Cast section the article discussing the work, Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the creator providing graphic design services to film concerns and in turn marketing films to the public.", which is not a valid fair use. There is no critical commentary of the individual screenshots or the composite image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 17:11, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No commentary about the images. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stranded AresSpacecraft landingSite70degLong-10degLat.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mlindroo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This "spacecraft image" is a composite of two different scenes used in the Cast section of Stranded (2001 film). The fair use rationale states its purpose is "The image is used for identification of the spacecraft that appears in the movie, i.e. in the context of critical commentary of the movie. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the creator providing graphic design services to film concerns and in turn marketing films to the public.", which is not a valid fair use. There is no critical commentary of the individual screenshots or the composite image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No commentary about the images. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 November 23. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huckleberry Hound.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Automatic for the People 25.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gizmoch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This cover isn't discussed critically and isn't remarkably different from the standard one. Fails WP:NFCC#8, pending any discussion of the re-release's design, etc. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghayoor rockstar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ghayoor Bhatti (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probably won't be used, duplicate on Commons is also marked for deletion. funplussmart (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 08:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - image is part of an autobiography effort. The uploader si claiming to be the copyright holder but he is also the subject of the photo so there potential copyright issues as well. -- Whpq (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.