The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kings Hand.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yitzilitt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence of a release under a specific free license. There is evidence of a Wikipedia-only permission, but this is not sufficient. Please ask the copyright holder if they agree to the terms of a specific license, like CC-BY-SA-4.0.Permission is required because this image would not be likely to meet the non-free content policy because it is currently used only in draftspace. Even if Draft:King's Hand were to become an article, it is only used for the purposes of illustration and a free alternative could be provided. The sourced commentary describes the food item, not this particular image of the item, so a freely-licensed replacement could be created to serve the same purpose. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows 10 2009 Screenshot with Start Menu.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MinhDung21032009 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

• Delete: Non-free, basically a duplicate of this image that serves the same purpose. Itsquietuptown t • c 02:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete File:RebaMyKindOfChristmas.jpeg, keep File:RebaMyKindOfChristmas2017.jpeg -FASTILY 23:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:RebaMyKindOfChristmas.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjichilders (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:RebaMyKindOfChristmas2017.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjichilders (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Right now the two cover arts are used. The top/primary cover art is of the first edition with "Cracker Barrel" logo on lower-left corner. The bottom/secondary cover art is of the reissue edition. The singer smiles in both covers; however, she sits on a chair in the first, while her upper body covered in a fur-looking blouse is shown in the reissue. Nonetheless, using more than one image with similar significant info is discouraged per WP:NFCC#3a. The reissue issue entered more Billboard charts than the first release of the album did, so, preferably, the reissue cover art should be used. On the other hand, if original cover is more preferable, at least the first issue charted and sold 2,100+ copies, but I think wider chart performances must matter more. George Ho (talk) 09:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward F. Crawford with Michael D. Higgins 1July2019.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dmoore5556 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Although this photograph was posted on the US Embassy in Ireland website, it appears to be the work of a commercial photo agency, not the US federal government. EDIT Metadata confirms as much. It says "NO REPRO FEE", but doesn't mention a license release. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

db-author Dmoore5556 (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.