The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brad Heckman.mp3 (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 9t5 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Recording taken from Facebook Live stream, which does not indicate any license (widely available to the public for free does not equal free to upload). Recording also fails WP:NFCC#1, as person that the recording is of is still alive. reppop^talk 06:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reppop I’ll send a message to the organization then. You know, you are able to write on my talk page *before* starting a discussion. Cheers. 9t5 (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom, fails WP:NFCC#1. ––FormalDude (talk) 12:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Len Smith 1947.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sticks66 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free in the US due to URAA restoration. There are already other free images in the article on the player from which his portrait could conceivably be cropped, but they are all quite low resolution themselves and therefore would make for a very low resolution crop. I am not sure how that affects replaceability, since of course someone could go to the Archive where the image is kept and make a higher resolution scan. Felix QW (talk) 16:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leyland railmotor no.51.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dan027 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Undated photo of a railcar that was still in service until 1954. If the photo was from after 1945, it is still copyrighted in the US. I exchanged it at Leyland railmotor for a similar image from the same source which is dated and certainly free in both the US and Australia. Felix QW (talk) 16:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grayson Murray.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DragonflyDC (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I'm concerned about the fair use claim on this copyright-protected image. He died recently, yes, but does that really suddenly mean we can use such an image? There's certainly the possibility of other images available that might be properly licensed for use on Wikipedia ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find a free image, and AFAIK there's no "too soon" rule about uploading fair-use images. Of course, anyone with a free image can always upload it and delete this one. DragonflyDC (talk) 18:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My point is i'm not sure how the deceased status of a subject suddenly provides a fair-use claim to a copyright protected image.--ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the licensing box says, fair-use images of deceased people are allowed to be locally hosted on English Wikipedia. DragonflyDC (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a file of a recently deceased person, and given his profession and availability to be seen by the public, it is reasonably likely that a free file can be found per WP:NFCI. Aspects (talk) 21:29, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CetDlogo-SabanInternationalParis.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GRPHX-TREME (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violates WP:NFCCP#8. Jonteemil (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no violation. It was uploaded as Non-Free and also refers to a corporate company. As a result, it helps users understand the subject. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure, to be used on BVS Entertainment, the logo must be used to identify that subject. Not another subject further down in the article. To be used further down in the article, then sourced critical commentary is needed, of which there are nothing. Jonteemil (talk) 10:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are other logos later in the article, and each one indicates the company's subsidiaries. Therefore, it was used for its intended purpose. Do not portray your personal point of view as a violation of the rules. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 11:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are not my personal opinions. See WP:Logos#Placement: Outside of these limits, neither non-free nor trademarked logos should be used within an article. I don't think the use of the logo is in line with the rules regarding non-free content on Wikipedia. A duplicate of this logo is already used on the seperate article of Créativité et Développement. Jonteemil (talk) 12:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you can use the logo in that title, replace it with this one and delete this one as well. I couldn't do it, maybe you can :) GRPHX-TREME (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I don't understand. Jonteemil (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added the logo that way because I had to. I could not use the C&D article's infobox logo on the "BVS" article. Please don't waste my time with this nonsense. If you can change it, go and change it. If you can't change it, let keep it that way. GRPHX-TREME (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:YOUGOFIRST is not a good argument. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I could use the logo in that title, I probably wouldn't upload a new one, right? GRPHX-TREME (talk) 15:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. As point six of WP:NFC#UUI shows, the subject has its own article at Créativité et Développement and duplicate of the logo is used there in the infobox. A link to this article suffices. ✗plicit 06:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.