Mediation Case: 2006-05-04 Appalachia, Virginia[edit]

Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.

Request Information

Request made by: Takeel 17:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the issue taking place?: Appalachia, Virginia

Who's involved?: Takeel; Davins111

What's going on?: I have asserted that Davins111 is adding a link to his/her own website (http://www.appalachiava.net/) in the Appalachia, Virginia article. The website's ability to be used as a reference is at question. I have tried to stimulate consensus-building on this by posting messages to Talk:Appalachia, Virginia, User talk:Davins111 and Wikipedia:Village pump (assistance). Nobody has responded on any of these talk pages. I have removed the link from Appalachia, Virginia multiple times, but Davins111 has repeatedly replaced it without explanation, edit summaries, or discussion.

This may be a concern with relation to the following policies/guidelines:

WP:SPAM

WP:VANITY

WP:NOT

What would you like to change about that?: I would like an opportunity to build consensus, particularly through examination by a neutral third party.

If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?: Not applicable.

Would you be willing to be a mediator yourself, and accept a mediation assignment in a different case?

This is, following the Categorical Imperative, the idea that you might want to do

what you expect others to do. You don't have to, of course, that's why it's a question.

My apologies, but I can't at this time.

Mediator response

Hi there. I am Cowman109 ^Talk and I have volunteered to take this case. It seems because you are dealing with an unresponsive user, the best bet may to be to see WP:3RR to report this user for a violation of the three revert rule. The only technical problem I see here is that his three reverts have not occured within 24 hours - also, you could just as easily be temporarily blocked for reverting his actions as well. In my opinion the best bet to take would be to take this route, and most :) admins don't bite and would understand that you are trying to contact the user. Just be sure to remain calm and civil and I'm sure they will hear you out. If you need anything else, feel free to ask. Cowman109 ^Talk 14:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Please report evidence in this section with ((Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Evidence)) for misconduct and ((Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Evidence3RR)) for 3RR violations. If you need help ask a mediator or an advocate. Evidence is of limited use in mediation as the mediator has no authority. Providing some evidence may, however, be useful in making both sides act more civil.
Wikipedia:Etiquette: Although it's understandably difficult in a heated argument, if the other party is not as civil as you'd like them to be, make sure to be more civil than him or her, not less.

Compromise offers

This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.

Comments by others

While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.

Discussion

How about Wikipedia:Third opinion? --Takeel 03:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be another good option as well. Third opinion seems to have a bit of a backlog problem but hopefully the situation will be heard out. Cowman109 ^Talk 04:12, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the dispute to Wikipedia:Third opinion. Thanks. --Takeel 18:27, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well so much for a backlog at WP:3o - it appears a third party agreed with you and removed the link as well. I'm closing this case. If you need anything else, this will remain on my watchlist. Happy editing! Cowman109 ^Talk 19:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]