- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Talk:Geography of Christmas/Comments (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Relisted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Old sub-page. I transferred the comments to the actual talk page, Legacypac (talk) 11:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ricky81682 (talk) 07:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unnecessary subpage with no unique history.--Mr. Guye (talk) 03:37, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- An active transclusion. Legacypac, please document your transfers. Is the content now forked? Next time subst would be more appropriate? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I did document my transfer [1] Legacypac (talk) 04:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I meant please document that trasfer here, which you have now done. Normally, this sort of thing is best redirected, and even should not be deleted as user contributions should be kept available unless there is good reason not to. In this case, the history includes an account for which an attempt to vanish was made, and this page retains its last deleted contribution. Delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not needed and I nearly even tagged it for speedy. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Your criteria for when to delete are pretty lax, which is OK, but your looseness with regard to CSD criteria is concerning. This page certainly doesn't meet any CSD criterion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not needed, get rid. JMHamo (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.