The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artist's rendering of a planned stadium, most likely not created by the uploader. Mosmof (talk) 00:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Deleted, most or all of the user's uploads have been yoinked off the web with false claim of authorship and false licenses. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced to another website; very little detail (no link to direct page, etc.). Uploader has slight history of copyvios. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:17, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:35, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source is here, upload date there is much earlier than upload date here. No license data is given on that wiki. Unless some evidence can be found that they have some compatible license, this image should be deleted. Protonk (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Collage, very likely not the work of the uploader. See recent AN/I thread for details. Protonk (talk) 02:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:42, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a screencap from TV coverage. See AN/I thread for more info. Protonk (talk) 02:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This, like many of the other images I am nominating concurrently, appears to be a publicity image, and it is doubtful that the uploader owns the copyright to the work, particularly as the uploader has been on Wikipedia for only seven days and has done nothing but edit the article depicting the person in the picture. Were I to guess, I'd say the uploader and the subject are probably one and the same. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think the uploader owns this image. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a particularly obvious promotional image that is very doubtful to be owned by the uploader. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another image that seems promotional and thus unlikely to be owned by the uploader. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional image that I do not think is owned by the uploader. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image appears to be scanned from a newspaper or magazine, which would be the very definition of unfree content. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This also appears to be scanned from print media. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of all the images I am listing here concurrently, this one is probably the most likely to actually be free, but I feel it should be listed as well, because if I doubt the ownership of 10 images, I can't reasonably not doubt the eleventh. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This one, as well, might be free, but I just am not sure enough. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image resembles a banner for a website. It is doubtful that the uploader owns it. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image appears to be scanned from a newspaper or magazine. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:27, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another publicity image. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 04:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File has been released in public domain but does not provide any information on creator Tomdobb (talk) 12:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. No one knows who took the picture as it is 34 years old. User:Lou72JG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. No one knows who took the picture as it is 58 years old. User:Lou72JG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no copyright on this photo, it is from my high school. User:Lou72JG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. No one knows who took the picture as it is 48 years old. User:Lou72JG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indicates public domain, no creator info, file has been deleted before Tomdobb (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I own this photo, it is from my high school. User:Lou72JG

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Luk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2-D piece of artwork, signed by the author with a date of '92. No proof image has been released in the manner the uploader claims. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that the uploader has now changed the licensing to "PD-self", which I also doubt. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have replied today to an OTRS communication (Ticket:2009051710015187). Several issues need to be resolved before we can accept this licensing, but the matter may resolve soon if the writer is able to comply. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An Ethereal Encounter[edit]

Awaiting advice from: permissions-en@wikimedia.org about all images on site. I am confident that all problems will be resolved but non-jargon assistance remains appreciated. I am sure you will understand.

Rotterdam1953 (talk) 21:31, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Satellite image from unknown source; uploader is unlikely to be the original copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded new, more informative image - , can delete the old one. - ^Kytabu_Talk 08:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is not licensed under a "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.", the uploader is not the copyright owner and does not have permission to use that photograph. Mr. Nagle (talk) 15:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permitting. Vinhtantran (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks exactly like an image found on page 61 of Nevell, Mike and Redhead, Norman: editors (2005), Mellor: Living on the Edge. A Regional Study of an Iron Age and Romano-British Upland Settlement, University of Manchester Archaeological Unit, Greater Manchester Archaeological Unit, and the Mellor Archaeological Trust, ISBN 0-9527813-6-0 ((citation)): |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link). User:Jcday, who uploaded the image, asserts the copyright is theirs and has released it under creative commons license 3.0. While it's possible this is true, I find it more likely that the image has been scanned straight from the book as the images are laid out exactly the same as in the book. I have asked whether the image is actually theirs, but the user has not edited since April, and infrequently before that. This makes me wary of the other images that they have uploaded. Nev1 (talk) 18:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image has digital watermarking which seems to indicate that this may not be owned by the uploader. Thus it is likely unfree. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 20:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted-FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:42, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user has uploaded dozens of images of coaches, claiming to have created them himself. About half were immediately deleted as obvious copyvios (watermarks, etc.), and I believe this is one too. – Quadell ^(talk) 20:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, all these too, by the same uploader:

• File:Williams kelly.jpg
• File:Yancy grande.jpg
• File:Harvey carey.jpg
• File:Gec chia.jpg
• File:Ali peek.jpg
• File:Ren ren.jpg
• File:Noel dunk.jpg
• File:Jared dillinger20.jpg
• File:Kb raymundo.gif
• File:Sonny thoss.jpg
• File:MILLER 13.jpg
• File:Jason castro.jpg
• File:Kelvin dela pena.jpg
• File:Tyrone conrad.jpg
• File:Joe de vance.jpg
• File:De vance.jpg
• File:Marlou aquino.jpg
• File:Jared guard.jpg
• File:Dare dillinger.jpg
• File:Jared dillinger.jpg
• File:The furious.jpg
• File:Mighty jimmy.jpg
• File:Coke Captain.jpg
• File:Coke Captain.jpg
• File:Kell will.jpg
• File:Thefast.jpg
• File:Dondon.jpg
• File:INTAL.jpg
• File:Redbull-coke-030609-20.jpg
• File:Alapag.jpg
• File:Mvpba.jpg
• File:CARDONA.jpg

• It is very unlikely that these images are actually the uploader's as claimed in the licensing. The image quality and framing are consistent with those shot by a courtside professional sports photographer. It is very unlikely that a spectator would be in a position to take these shots. Making a false claim of licensing is also consistent with the behaviour in the obvious copyvios. -- Whpq (talk) 12:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.