The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 00:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HJLevin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Historical photo of a notable individual Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• As previously communicated to Wikipedia's Permissions division via email from the http://www.harveyjlevin.com url, I am the Administrator of the Harvey J. Levin Estate and director of the Harvey J. Levin website (http://www.harveyjlevin.com). The photo in question does, in fact, belong to me, and I have held all rights to it since Dr. Levin's death in 1992. Indeed, it is the main photo on the official Harvey J. Levin website maintained by me since 2003. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L12ra (talk • contribs) 02:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Provisional. As long as the above post pans out. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramendra.jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader's other files seem to be copyvios of this site, this image is used in the header. If the uploader is the photographer, permission is still required.  fetchcomms☛ 04:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above + delete its duplicate as well. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close. Filed is tagged as non-free, so it shouldn't have come to this venue at all. — ξ^xplicit 00:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nvidia geforce gtx 480.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Anyone could take a picture of these, but I'm not sure if the graphics card design is copyrighted. I doubt it, although the logos might have be to blurred/removed.  fetchcomms☛ 04:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Copyrighted image that is completely replaceable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramendra kumar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Eeekster (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unused, unencyclopedic image with no context. We are not an image host. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:09, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bristol Airport logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This logo is no longer used by the airport and no longer in use in the Bristol Airport article, therefore I believe it should be deleted. As I also believe the current licence that is applied is spurious (due to the complexity of the B/aircraft shape used, I think there is perfect justification for deleting it as a non-free logo no longer in use. Simple Bob (talk) 10:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm fine with this being deleted. Looking at it again, you're probably right about the complexity. Regardless, it should go if it's not in use. I'll vector the new logo when I get some time, maybe. --Dancraggs 16:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 00:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barangay mamatid seal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file is an official seal of a local government in the Philippines. The Republic Act No. 8293 forbids the use of seals of local governments in commercial use. JL 09 ^_q?c 14:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Then it simply needs to be labeled as such and given a FUR. Use in an encyclopedia for purposes of identification is an appropriate application of "Fair Use". — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:58277166 1209574Presidential PalaceKhartoum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copied from http://www.pbase.com/image/58277166 which has a copyright notice - unlikely that uploader (User:Charlir91) is the owner. snigbrook (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason Saxman 13 (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have special permission to you use this picture (Carlsbad High Cavemen) strait from the Carlsbad Municipal Schools website. www.carlsbad.k12.nm.us

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONIS LOGO - ORANGE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This seems like a corporate logo. The uploader might be related to the company, but this really needs a FUR I think. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.