The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PuteoliAmphitheater.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a news paper scan. Sreejith K (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-Prodigy-2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as being under the GFDL, however it is asserted that 'All Rights [are] Reserved'. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 07:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Choco Hills.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as gfdl/cc-by-sa, however the description asserts that 'All Rights [are] Reserved' Acather96 (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IssahAhmed web.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• not free Inem pelayan sexy (talk) 08:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Left hand caponnier 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Right hand caponnier1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Right hand rear corner.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Right hand ditch 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Right hand ditch.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battery gate.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rear ditch and causway.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rear ditch.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as self-gdl however the description says 'All Rights Reserved'. Acather96 (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, image is GFDL, per my comment at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 August 4#File:Battery Plan.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apex-pinboard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to a company website, but tagged as self-GFDL, and another tag which I've not seen before which says that the copyright holder allows anyone to use the work providing that the author and image description are credited. There is no evidence of this on the website, and this image is only used in a userspace page which is currently at MFD. Acather96 (talk) 08:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista-outdoor-banner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to a company website, but tagged as self-GFDL, and another tag which I've not seen before which says that the copyright holder allows anyone to use the work providing that the author and image description are credited. There is no evidence of this on the website, and this image is only used in a userspace page which is currently at MFD. Acather96 (talk) 08:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plex 100.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to a company website, but tagged as self-GFDL, and another tag which I've not seen before which says that the copyright holder allows anyone to use the work providing that the author and image description are credited. There is no evidence of this on the website, and this image is only used in a userspace page which is currently at MFD. Acather96 (talk) 08:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fusion-mod-unit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to a company website, but tagged as self-GFDL, and another tag which I've not seen before which says that the copyright holder allows anyone to use the work providing that the author and image description are credited. There is no evidence of this on the website, and this image is only used in a userspace page which is currently at MFD. Acather96 (talk) 08:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gripframe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to a company website, but tagged as self-GFDL, and another tag which I've not seen before which says that the copyright holder allows anyone to use the work providing that the author and image description are credited. There is no evidence of this on the website, and this image is only used in a userspace page which is currently at MFD. Acather96 (talk) 08:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helios-4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as being free as long as attribution is provided however it is sourced to a company website, and their is no mention of any such license on the company website. Only used on a userspace page that is currently at MFD. Acather96 (talk) 08:55, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faqir Chand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of another photograph, hence derivative, of a work of unknown copyright status. Might be okay for NFC, but the source information for the original is also inadequate. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:07, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Presentation gold-plated AO drill.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader indicates that it is not his own work, and specifies single-use permission, yet listed it as "public domain". Your Lord and Master (talk) 14:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• What would you like me to do? The photographer, a busy consultant surgeon, asked me to load it onto Wikipedia. Duncanogi (talk) 19:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're asking this question again? Read the copyright policies listed in easy-to-read English on this page, please. Your Lord and Master (talk) 11:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop being so "Lord and Master"ish. The procedures need to be simplified to handle situations such as this.Duncanogi (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, no they don't. The procedures are straightforward and clear. You just need to read and follow them, like everyone else manages to. Your Lord and Master (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROCgroupphoto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is not the copyright holder and cannot release this photo into the public domain. Your Lord and Master (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SnowonNest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

also nominating:

• File:Robinhoodbeach.jpg
• File:Beachcave.jpg

• Dubious "own work" claim, uploaded by known serial copyvio offender. Several photographs of common landscape elements and objects with suspiciously divergent exif data. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.