The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieira et al Signaling from the ZLI.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is "Granted via email from Dr. Salvador Martinez". Not OTRS logged. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyriq Headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a promotional photograph, doubt uploader is copyright holder, ((PD-self)) claim is probably false. Acather96 (talk) 06:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pitlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned logo, doubt ((PD-self)) claim. Acather96 (talk) 06:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tirsuli group.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be the work of the uploader as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 07:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I (susantab) have received this from Mr. Asim Mukhopadhyay the main organizer of the expedition. I am publishing the image in wikipedia after getting due permission from him. More details can be found in Asim Mukhopadhyay wiki page.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-Supra-Skytops FF687555.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The watermark makes me suspicous of this file's copyright status, and no real source is given (which consumer?). –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seth Vishandas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Scanned from printed source? Eeekster (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all, deleted by After Midnight. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Following up on this nomination with more images. Per commons:Commons:Derivative works#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!, these are derivative works and therefore non-free. Additionally, note that most (but not all) of them are orphaned and that most (quite possibly all) have no real foreseeable encyclopedic use (WP:NOTWEBHOST). There are also a few (e.g., the footlocker images) of things which are not toys, but are closely related and also have no real encyclopedic use. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbert D. Smith 008.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be from a printed source (most likely a newspaper). Eeekster (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.