The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: unlisted/speedy keep Image is unambiguously in the public domain as it was published in the United States prior to 1978 without a copyright notice.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 08:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Publicity photo young gleason.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is uloaded as "no copyright, published prior to 1978", however the photo is copyrighted. This can be seen in the original, uncropped photo, where the photographer's name/logo is included in the lower right corner. This is a typical rights mark used by photographers during this time period and indicates rights ownership. Night Ranger (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• I do not see a copyright symbol on the original photograph. Having a photographer's name and logo may indicate many things, but it was not legally sufficient in the 1940 to copyright a work. The actual © symbol was what was necessary. Unless there is further evidence that the photo was actually copyrighted (not just "owned"), then keep. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• United States Copyright Office page 2 "Visually Perceptible Copies The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain all three elements described below. They should appear together or in close proximity on the copies.

1 The symbol © (letter C in a circle); the word “Copyright”; or the abbreviation “Copr.”

2 The year of first publication. If the work is a derivative work or a compilation incorporating previously published material, the year date of first publication of the derivative work or compilation is sufficient. Examples of derivative works are translations or dramatizations; an example of a compilation is an anthology. The year may be omitted when a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or useful articles.

3 The name of the copyright owner, an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of owner.1 Example © 2007 Jane Doe." We hope (talk) 00:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right. But for those following along at home, please be aware that this only applies to works first published before 1978. Recent works don't need any notice at all. (I know you know that, but I just wanted to make it explicit.) – Quadell ^(talk) 11:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astonishing Stories Cover December 1940.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is claimed the copyright to this periodical (Dec 1940 issue) was not renewed. This is incorrect. It was registered on 25 Oct 1940 under B475962 and renewed on 7 Nov 1967 under R421341.[1] Jappalang (talk) 07:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astonishing Stories Cover April 1941.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is claimed the copyright to this periodical (Apr 1941 issue) was not renewed. This is incorrect. It was registered on 25 Feb 1941 under B491208 and renewed on 8 Nov 1968 under R447880.[2] Jappalang (talk) 07:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astonishing stories 194302.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is claimed the copyright to this periodical (Feb 1943 issue) was not renewed. This is incorrect. It was registered on 2 Dec 1942 under B567481 and renewed on 2 Nov 1970 under R493206.[3] Jappalang (talk) 07:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; Recommend deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startling Stories 1944 Fall cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright of this issue (Fall 1944, registered on 7 Jul 1944 under B642288) was renewed on 6 Mar 1972 under R524553.[4] Jappalang (talk) 12:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I have updated the image with a low-resolution version suitable for fair use, and have added a fair use rationale. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startling Stories 1946 Winter cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright of this issue (Win 1946, registered on 5 Oct 1945 under B699345) was renewed on 9 Aug 1973 under R556894.[5] Jappalang (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I have updated the image with a low-resolution version suitable for fair use, and have added a fair use rationale. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startling Stories 1950 Jan cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright of this issue (Jan 1950, registered on 4 Nov 1949 under B223394) was renewed on 12 Sep 1977 under R680574.[6] Jappalang (talk) 13:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I have updated the image with a low-resolution version suitable for fair use, and have added a fair use rationale. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startling Stories 1950 Mar cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright of this issue (Mar 1950, registered on 5 Jan 1950 under B233897) was renewed on 12 Sep 1977 under R680577.[7] Jappalang (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I have updated the image with a low-resolution version suitable for fair use, and have added a fair use rationale. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startling Stories 1950 Jul cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The copyright of this issue (Jul 1950, registered on 2 May 1950 under B249909) was renewed on 12 Sep 1977 under R680533.[8] Jappalang (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I have updated the image with a low-resolution version suitable for fair use, and have added a fair use rationale. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ousmane web.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No permission from www.randersfc.dk ᑲᓇᑕᒥ (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Mixed history of two different people of this generic name, Milton Davis Jr. and Milton Jiricka, both deleted via PROD for lack of notability. The tags were never updated for the latter, so those revisions can fall to ((nld)) and ((nld)). But give the history mess, confusing name (leading to history mess) and uselessness at this time, cleaner to delete and then if there's a need someone can upload the "right" one at an appropriate name with proper tagging. DMacks (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Association woman and society logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Might not meet WP:PD#Fonts as the image appears to meet the threshold of originality to be copyrighted. Website from which this image appears to be taken states "[a]ll rights reserved" which is presumed to apply to this image as well; thus, this is believed to be an unused fair use image. Kinu ^t/_c 20:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Timberland Heights View.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• What photo-sharing site? Insufficient source to confirm licensing. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no source. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Papa rellena.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Pachamanca canasta.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Suspirolimeño.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Chupe de camaron.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Empanada.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Butifarra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Lomosaltado.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Tiradito.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Cevichemixto.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Causa sampler.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I could not find it on flickr after doing a brief search, so we can't confirm the licensing status. Note also File:Rocoto relleno.jpg and File:Ceviche sampler.jpg, both of which I did find on flickr and both of which are listed there as "All rights reserved". –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The author is not listed, so it would be a violation of the cc license even if that were accurate. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, yes. I was trying to locate the originals so that I could add such credit, but once some turned up as being all rights reserved and others couldn't be found... well... yeah. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ricardo de Montreuil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same uploader as the food images above; since user doesn't seem to concerned by copyright, I'm inclined to think that this one may also be a copyvio. Tineye comes up with a few results, but they're all lower resolution. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.