The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curacao Football Team.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Team logo not likely to be free. Eeekster (talk) 02:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PilatesTheraBand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• orphaned, used for spam article Pilates Suit, no proof that image was released as PD Skier Dude (talk) 04:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. This image is not used anywhere on en.wiki, and so if it's actually non-free, we would have to delete it anyway. Since it's already on Commons and there is a parallel deletion discussion going on there, it makes no sense to have two discussions going on about the same thing when it's orphaned on en.wiki. So deleting, and encouraging anyone interested to comment on the Commons discussion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meissner effect zoom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meissner effect zoom.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does someone have some sort of bot loose causing unnecessary grief? The copyright notice comprises a pre-made tag stating that it is from the U.S. Department of Energy and is therefore a work of the U.S. federal government so the image is in the public domain. Could anything be clearer? Is someone supposed to write “See the above tag — the image is in the public domain” to make bots (and those who want to do great good on Wikipedia) happy??? I’ve been a registered editor for years and Wikipedia’s processes and procedures for using images is a confusing G*d-damned pain in the ass. Greg L (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• While the original link is no longer active, it is here on the Wayback machine. Note the link there to Use of Photos. Concur with Greg's comment on the PITA state of image tagging, but the source page could have been clearer as to whether the work was PD-USGov or a liberally licensed work-for-hire by the Battelle Memorial Institute. LeadSongDog come howl! 15:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Worcester, Western Cape - Old Mission School.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Worcester, Western Cape - Old Mission School.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitecompanydoyle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Whitecompanydoyle.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vojvodina gepids langobards009.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vojvodina gepids langobards009.png Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:21, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created that image from deleted image that was uploaded by user:Fz22. It is not my own work and I was not aware that image of user:Fz22 is copyrighted. PANONIAN 13:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:VonSchneidau 500.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:VonSchneidau 500.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imagen llama blanca2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Soft Toy design, and logo inclusion give me concerns about the claim this is a 'free' work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Resident evil 4 chainsaw controller.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Speedy Request was removed because it was listed as a "wii remote". My contention is that because this is a non-standard artistic Wii remote in the form of a chainsaw, while the picture taker released the copyright on the photo, the image of the controller, being central to image, is still under NFCC violation, especially as the logo is clearly visable in the center of the image.∞陣内Jinnai 17:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Variable dwarf olive.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Variable dwarf olive.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victormatson 500.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victormatson 500.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• The images I upload are all part of my own archive of more than 15,000 photographs and slides that my were taken by myself, my father and my teacher. This includes all of the Theodore Lukits images, the Victor Matson images, the Von Schenidau images and everything else I upload. I own the copyright on all the images I upload, so your speculation - and that is what it is - that the copyright is in question is incorrect. So, delete them if you want to destroy the integrity of the articles and deprive viewers of being able to actually see what they are reading about. This is why Wikipedia is increasingly a waste of time, because any vandal can destroy an article that someone has put time and energy into writing and adding images to. I have had busybodies delete images from the 1870s because "copyright is in question" and other nonsense. After my stroke, I just don't have the time or energy to spend a lot of time battling people with a red pen and altogether too much time on their hands. User: ArtnHistory (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture of old resus methods.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt the uploader actually holds the copyright on the image that was photographed —Darxus (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.