The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChristianBauman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no information has been given about this photo or its copyright status. no author is named and it doesn't even say if this is their own photo or not. this image may be copyrighted. Redsky89 (talk) 21:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Sidney William George Ford MBE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Invalid reason given for public domain. Eeekster (talk) 00:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment should we request WP:ORTS information on this, it is likely the uploader (who I have no doubt owns the picture) probably does not own the copyright of the image, however if we can get source information a claim of fair use could be made. LGA _talk^edits 00:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Google's explanatory page, which can be considered a license statement for their technical transformation of the work, requests non-commercial use only and is thus incompatible with WP licensing. —Darkwind (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Lifted directly from Google Books, Cover shown does not resemble a 1st edition. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment per the Google coversheet notice It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. AND if you examined the PDF file, you would have found the copyright notice of 1920 which is pre-1923. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the first page The first page ("This is a digital copy of a book...") is © Google and may not be uploaded to Wikipedia. The rest of the material is ((PD-scan|PD-1923)). --Stefan2 (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.