The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: four revisions deleted. Diannaa (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perro de Presa Canario - Fawn color.jpg (delete | talk | history | de Presa Canario - Fawn color.jpg logs).

• Overwritten file: two in one. The pictures of a woman are missing evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 00:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• History delete. Next time, please use ((Orphaned non-free revisions)). Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • ((subst:orfurrev)) is only to be used when fair use is claimed, which is not the case here. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well it is claimed. First, a correction: ((subst:orfurrev)) is relevant when non-free use is claimed. Here, non-free use is claimed in the uploader's comment section. He claims authorized use. (It contradicts with the copyright tag that says "I, the copyright holder, ...") Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • If you mean the claim "used by permission" in the edit summary, then it could mean anything from ((db-f3)) to ((cc-zero)). You can only use ((subst:orfurrev)) if the user claims that the user claims that the file is used under the terms of WP:NFCC, which is not the case here. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • What do I (or you or anyone else) care? It is "non-free", it is "orphaned", it is "revision". That fits the bill for deletion, with or without ((subst:Orphaned non-free revisions)). It seems to me you also want it deleted for these very same reasons, so why do you argue over which tag or venue deletes it? Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernando Pessoa painting (3).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably not own work. Looks like a professional painting of Fernando Pessoa. No idea who the artist is. Stefan2 (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Channel 7 live pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• shot by Haruko for Capsule Studios, Nyc - OTRS permission needed Deadstar (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.