The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dr. Rabbit → Colgate (toothpaste)#Advertising  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No secondary sourcing found for this mascot and it's highly unlikely it will ever be mentioned in the target article. It was removed from there with this edit by Smuckola. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 17:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There's some (mostly) secondary sourcing from local news media about this Dr. Rabbit. Looking at the article, having a short mention about the mascot of the toothpaste seems like a reasonable addition since it's been around for a decent bit. Free Colgate toothpaste and toothbrushes for kindergarten and first-grade classrooms, Web dowser, National oral health program targets area school. Skynxnex (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Colgate-Palmolive which has a mention. Jay 💬 08:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hommage а l'amour → Hommage a l'amour  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Cyrillic letter "а" in this redirect. I know it's a redirect from a page move but we can't be having redirects like this because they are both implausible and not useful to anyone; delete per WP:MIXEDSCRIPT. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:51, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom; mixed-script redirects are almost-always unhelpful. Duckmather (talk) 19:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bo Takhro railway stationn → Bo Takhro railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A very unlikely typo, no one is going to search the name of a local Thai station and add an extra 'n' onto the end. This is not even a redirect from a page move. Redirects like this are just clutter. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Has (had) hundreds of incoming links, due to a typo in Template:State Railway of Thailand Railway Stations that I only fixed just now. User:LukWarUrs made a mistake by creating a redirect instead of fixing the typo back in 2018, but it remained unfixed in the five years since. Wait and make sure that all the transclusions have been updated, then delete. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Pppery. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2025–26 → 2025–26 UEFA Women’s Nations League  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect - there is a link to this refirect from 2024–25 Biathlon World Cup, so I'm pretty sure that anyone clicking this link from that article is not looking for the 2025–26 UEFA Women’s Nations League. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 16:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this redirect is too large for an article that is also too soon. Dr vulpes (Talk) 00:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete per above; I only made it a redirect when moving a page.

  - The Master of Hedgehogs ^{(always up for a conversation!)} 01:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedily delete per R3 and G6 (recently created / obvious error). --Paul_012 (talk) 04:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Israhell → Israel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Has been deleted under CSD as vandalism, now tagged with ((R from misspelling)). Seems like an implausible typo to me. NotAGenious (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RNEUTRAL. J947 ‡ ^edits 09:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RNEUTRAL as a non-neutral and unlikely search term not used in any reliable sources. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It is important to note that this is not a typo (plausible or otherwise) but an intentional pejorative misspelling, so much of the nomination is somewhere between misleading and irrelevant. The relevant question (as the other commenters have identified) is whether it is sufficiently commonly used for the likely search term part of WP:RNEUTRAL to apply, however this is not as clear as the two !votes above suggest. For starters this has been quoted in at least one reliable source (a 2014 Times of Israel article[1]), and it does have many independent uses. There is no scope for encyclopaedic content about the term itself, so if this title is a blue link it can only be a redirect. There is no Wiktionary entry, and no viable alternative target (Names of the Levant (where Names of Israel redirects) is the only vaguely relevant one I've found, and that's clearly inappropriate) but if it does exist the current target is an appropriate one so keep or delete are the only options. What tips it to delete for me is that the uses which do exist are not very prominent - the significant majority of them are lower down in search results than Wikipedia article title scrapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thryduulf (talk • contribs) 02:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G14. ✗plicit 11:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Two-dimensional space (disambiguation) → Two-dimensional space  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete or restore since the target is not a disambiguation. If anyone found more, disambiguate again. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: See extended discussion at WT:WikiProject Mathematics#Disambiguation of Two-dimensional space. The target page was recently created as a WP:broad-concept article; the simple disambig page may no longer be needed. Pinging User:Jacobolus, who created both. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Feel free to delete Two-dimensional space (disambiguation). I don't think anything important links there. –jacobolus (t) 04:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per G14. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:48, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I invited Explicit to close this discussion, and he speedy deleted it. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 11:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation if a mention is re-added. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 05:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Three Virtues of a Programmer → Larry Wall  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Relevant content at the target page was removed in 2012, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Larry_Wall&diff=prev&oldid=509283715. When the deleted content was reinstated at the redirect page in 2017 it as immediately removed again as not notable, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_Virtues_of_a_Programmer&diff=prev&oldid=783876601. Tea2min (talk) 09:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep if this is the first or most commonly referenced instance of "laziness" as a programmer virtue. I think it's worth re-including in the article and keeping the redirect, that's a very commonly referenced concept in my experience. The issue with the removed paragraph seems to be quoting them in full, I'd add in one-two sentences. I'll look into this when I'm at my computer. Rusalkii (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. There is still no content about the "Three Virtues of a Programmer" in the article. —Alalch E. 08:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Alalch. May be recreated if someone happens to add content to an article, and it stays, unlike before. Jay 💬 18:49, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The Goryeo-Kithan War → List of programmes broadcast by the Korean Broadcasting System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Duplicate redirect page of The Goryeo-Khitan War of which both created by the same user. ^{98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂} _{[📩 • 🗃️]} 11:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Penny pincher → Miser  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Propose retarget to frugality as that is closer given to the definition at wiktionary:penny pincher. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I don't agree: a miser "is a person who is reluctant to spend money"; frugality is "the quality of being frugal, sparing, thrifty, prudent, or economical in the consumption of resources such as food, time or money, and avoiding waste, lavishness or extravagance", i.e. with money or other things. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Penny Pinchers is a South Korean film, Penny Pincher! redirects to Radin!, a French film (the phrase isn't mentioned in the prose of the latter, but one of the sources uses it extensively as the English translation of the title). Thryduulf (talk) 12:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate with Thryduulf's suggestions, with a link to Wiktionary. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per Paul_012. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Drafted a dab at the redirect. Jay 💬 16:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambig per above. I've added Frugality as a see also. Thryduulf (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Nicolae Velo. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Moscopolea → Moscopole  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Moscopole is a village in Albania. It is known as Moscopole in Aromanian, a Romance language related to Romanian. "Moscopolea" is not an alternate name of the city. -a is the definite articulation particle, it's basically the same as saying "the Moscopole", cities in English-speaking countries like New York can also be added this particle in Aromanian but it might be hard to understand for English-speakers. Anyway, we don't need this redirect. An Aromanian-speaker would look up the base name of the village, if their intention is getting to the article. For more information look up Moscopole's Wiktionary entry [2]. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Nicolae Velo and tag as ((R from poem)). Jay 💬 08:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Jay. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:27, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Alliedpower → Allies of World War I  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think this spelling is useful or a likely search term. If it could be moved to a different spelling in the page title, perhaps that would be a better solution than deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Allied Powers (a DAB page) as harmless. 🎄Cremastra 🎄 (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No useful page history, malformatted title. Suggest deletion. Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and Ca. Malformed redirect due to lack of spacing. No useful page history to preserve. Also, it appears this redirect was created in error while performing a page move by Nguyen280405, so it was perfectly eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G6. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all, with the exception of Clapham Junction tube station, which is retargeted to Clapham Junction railway station#Future proposals ^Complex/_Rational 03:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Camden Road tube station → Camden Road railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kentish Town West tube station → Kentish Town West railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Dalston Kingsland tube station → Dalston Kingsland railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Acton Central tube station → Acton Central railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Gospel Oak tube station → Gospel Oak railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Leyton Midland Road tube station → Leyton Midland Road railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Leytonstone High Road tube station → Leytonstone railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Hackney Wick tube station → Hackney Wick railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Homerton tube station → Homerton railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• North Woolwich tube station → North Woolwich railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Brondesbury Park tube station → Brondesbury Park railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Hampstead Heath tube station → Hampstead Heath railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Upper Holloway tube station → Upper Holloway railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Clapham Junction tube station → Clapham Junction railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Queens Road Peckham tube station → Queens Road Peckham railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Peckham Rye tube station → Peckham Rye railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Imperial Wharf tube station → Imperial Wharf railway station  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible redirects, none of these are tube stations and never been a tube stations. Going to nominate one last batch of these "tube stations" that never been tube stations and never ever been proposed to be tube stations. All of these are London Overground stations with the exception of North Woolwich which was only ever a Silverlink station before closure. Pkbwcgs (talk) 02:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Overground stations with a few of these names may be physically in tubes, but tube station is a term of art meaning part of the London Underground, and that network has no stations with these names. Even the redirect I recently retargeted to a dab (Leytonstone) is unwanted per WP:XY. Certes (talk) 10:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• The Leytonstone railway station one appeared on WP:D alerts as it's a disambiguation page, and there's a link to a tube station there, so maybe just retarget that one? --Joy (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Retarget to where? Before I fiddled with it, it redirected to Leytonstone High Road railway station, which is as bad (or good) as the others on the list because it's a station that's not a tube station. The alternative is Leytonstone tube station but that's not called High Road (nor on High Road). Certes (talk) 14:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Joy: Leytonstone High Road station and Leytonstone station are both very different. Leytonstone High Road is a London Overground station but Leytonstone on its own is a Tube station on the Central Line. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Okay, if it's just a contrived name, then by all means get rid of it. --Joy (talk) 10:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete most, but retarget Clapham Junction tube station to Clapham Junction railway station#Future proposals since there have been notable proposals and provisions made to extend the Northern line to Clapham Junction. the wub "?!" 17:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, that one may be worth keeping. Certes (talk) 18:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete most as misleading redirects which receive virtually no pageviews but retarget Clapham Junction tube station to Clapham Junction railway station#Future proposals as proposed by the wub. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).