This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 14, 2024.
No Inhumans film has released in 2019. Inhumans (film) exists for the unproduced film. Gonnym (talk) 11:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I think this redirect should be retargeted to Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, as I feel that almost anyone who types in 'WP:DONOTDISRUPT' is looking for the disrupt to prove a point guideline, and not the general Wikipedia:Disruptive editing guideline. — AP 499D25 (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
There are other "extremist settlers" that are not necessarily Israeli. The term does not seem to apply to one particular group of people, as anyone who settles and is an "extremist" would be meet this criteria. Does not seem to be a useful and predictable redirect in its current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kanji not mentioned at the target article, no evident affinity to have one either Utopes (talk / cont) 06:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target article. Searching for this term externally, there doesn't seem anything that ties "sunset ranch"es in New Mexico with Albuquerque specifically. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to have this title beginning with a parenthesis without one to close as well. Could possibly be moved to a new title, but I don't know whether that would be valuable and make this search term any more likely. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This redirect appears to be a combination of both Latin and Arabic scripts in order to copy the appearance of an existing redirect. It seems that this situation has resulted in the unnatural copying of two left parenthesis, but with an axis flipped to appear rightward facing. I'm not convinced that this is a plausible way to stylize this search term, but I could be mistaken. A visually identical version exists at: جامعة جورجتاون (قطر), which maintains a left and a right parenthesis. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to precede this search term with a parenthesis, and no views in the last 60 days, one in the last 90. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The history for this redirect comes from a user that was writing two of the same articles at the same time, over the course of 5 minutes. The page was moved at XX:06, but the main contributor did not realize that the page was moved, so at XX:11 the rest of the changes were made onto the Truly (Melanie Amaro album) page. Both of these were later BLAR'd very shortly after. This title in particular has quite minimal history, and was only accidentally edited, apparently. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I am suggesting that this redirect be deleted. Melling is an actor who played Nigel Wolport, a minor character in the films who is not included in the Harry Potter books (see Colin and Dennis Creevey). In December 2019, an article on Melling was the subject of an AfD (link) which closed as Redirect to the list article. In August 2022, editor El Millo removed (link) Melling and Wolport from the list, having found no reliable sources that could document Melling in the Harry Potter films. I have also found no reliable sources.
This leaves us with the odd situation where Melling is bluelinked in his other appearances (Vanity Fair (2004 film) and Fried (2015 TV series)), but following those bluelinks redirects readers to an article that offers no useful information about Melling. Melling appears to have had a minor role in the former film and an ensemble-ish role in the latter film; I doubt that that these appearances clear WP:NACTOR, which require significant roles in multiple notable ... productions
. IMDb suggests no other major appearances. Consequently, I think that the redirect is best deleted to avoid the confusion that the bluelinks presently create. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Article for this song was created and reverted by a single user, but converted into a redirect. A redirect at this title would be an implausible search term, and duplicates the (current) redirect for Miss You (Nickelback song), which has been edit-warred on 8 or so times since 2015, across which included the involvement of the user that created this redirect. The history of this one is quite miniscule in comparison, and seems to have been full-cleared by the only contributor. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect which was a BLAR'd one-sentence stub that duplicated Moonlight (Ariana Grande album) several days after THAT page was developed, and also BLAR'd. Does not seem to be an added-value redirect with the missing parenthesis and content duplication. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to have been posted once on Youtube. I never would have been able to tell, because the pageviews are microscopic, meaning this R from external link does not seem to be helping. On the flipside, this redirect is unnaturally constructed, interferes with navigation, and not likely to be searched due to the unexpected missing parenthesis. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
When this redirect first ended up at RfD, it was a few months old redirect that just was settling down in views after being faultily linked to once on reddit. Since then, this redirect only is goggled at as one of a small handful of redirects in the "R from external links" that looks the most abnormal among the other abnormalities. If created today, it would likely be an R3 candidate due to its unnatural punctuation. But, now in 2024, it seems as if this title has served its external use, and now is only an implausible typo that clogs a category full of other unnatural titles, without the external views to show for it. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
%5C, and not if it is the character literal \, but that could also just be on my computer/in my browser. TartarTorte 14:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Implausible searching error to make with the last parenthesis only. Was created due to an external link, but has sat at 0 views in the last 5 months (despite being linked on 2015's TOPRED and in the category for R from external links). External typos shouldn't require the existence of clutter redirects on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The set of remaining redirects that have 0 pageviews according to massviews, from C-S. All of which do not have substantive history, all make errors in the act of disambiguation, and all having replicated titles in existence, or not able to have one. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)