The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tonight's Not Alright (song) → Plumtree (band)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This supposed song is not mentioned or alluded to at the target article in any capacity, making this an unhelpful redirect which doesn't offer anything to readers. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Also worth noting that Tonight's Not Alright has never existed. Thryduulf (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not mentioned anywhere. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 05:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The Pig Farmer → Squealer (2023 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is not a name ever equated to the movie at the target page. This movie is inspired by Robert Pickton, who was often called the Pig Farmer Killer (which a redirect to his page). A redirect called "the pig farmer" seems to be describing a person and not a movie. Additionally, there is the presence of a Pig farmer redirect, which describes pig farmers at large. In the meantime, this redirect paints a confusing picture with the current state of the target, as this title can be interpreted to reference many different articles that mention these words, all while this article doesn't. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep added to target using WP:RS mentioning this as a title. The only other thing anywhere in Wikipedia exactly called "The Pig Farmer" is a 5-minute short by Nick Cross (animator) which does not seem to displace the feature film from WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, things titled "Pig Farmer" (the only thing I can find is a TV episode), let alone "pig farmer" in sentence case, aren't appropriate targets for this redirect. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 23:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per IP now there's a mention. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Surface Book 4 → Microsoft Surface  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect for a laptop that does not exist and that seems unlikely to ever exist given Surface Laptop Studio appears to be the higher end 2-in-1 laptop to replace this Awesome Aasim 21:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Made-up. Doesn't exist, and apparently never will. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Jabari Banks → Bel-Air (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This page for the actor redirects to the show he's most known for, Bel-Air. However, the latter page includes basically no information about Banks himself, only really noting that simple facts that he was cast for, and stars in, the series. As such, readers searching for Banks, most likely recognising him from the show and wanting to know more, will get next-to-nothing out of this redirect. This page should simply be deleted and red-linked until a proper article on Banks is written. Loytra (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete to encourage article creation (WP:RFD#D10). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 🏴󠁩󠁱󠁫󠁲󠁿 → Flag of Kurdistan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can't verify that this is indeed the emoji. 🏴󠁩󠁲󠀱󠀶󠁿 is the emoji named "Flag for Kurdistan (IR-16)", while this one I can't find which one it is. Gonnym (talk) 12:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• We should delete all emoji redirects but the most common ones. We also have 🏴󠁡󠁧󠀱󠀰󠁿, 🏴󠁡󠁧󠀱󠀱󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁶󠁩󠁿; 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁵󠁭󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁰󠁲󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁭󠁰󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁧󠁵󠁿, 🏴󠁵󠁳󠁡󠁳󠁿... Putting one of these in the search box does give the most funny search ever though, but useful it ain't. Fram (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • There was a large RFC recently about emoji redirects. There was no overall consensus, but there was clear consensus against widespread deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • And...? There is still no rule that one has to agree with consensus or is no longer allowed to express their disagreement, no? And emojis loose all purpose if you can't even see what they represent. Fram (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      There is indeed no such rule, but equally there is no rule or other reason why people should not point out what the consensus is when views contrary to that are expressed - especially when the person replying does not know whether the person making the original comment is aware of that consensus or not.

      Emoji display is system dependant, so what you see is not necessarily the same as what other people see. People copying an emoji they can't see and looking it up in a general purpose reference work such as Wikipedia is very common. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 21#🏴󠁭󠁭󠀱󠀶󠁿. Thryduulf (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      • Very weird closure, that last one, discounting some people but not clearly incorrect statements like "Keep. Deleting this page would make it the only emoji without a redirect on Wikipedia. " when many other emojis have no Wikipedia redirect at the moment. "People copying an emoji they can't see and looking it up in a general purpose reference work such as Wikipedia is very common" for emojis that people who use enwiki are likely to encounter, which isn't true for all 150,000 unicode characters of course. Fram (talk) 13:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

        Do you have any source which shows which emoji readers of Wikipedia are likely to encounter and which they aren't? Thryduulf (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

        • No, do you have any source which shows that all 150,000 unicode characters are likely search terms for enwiki readers? Are people likely to use "⤵" as a search term? [₈]? [⁸]? Just found one which has already been deleted twice, it gives the nice text "Creating " when clicked (not even a blank square or so), but it is listed on our page List of Unicode characters anyway (which only lists about 1000 of the 150K characters). Fram (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is a flag composed with the selector "IQKR", and a bit of googling indicates this is the code for Kurdistan Region, an autonomous region of Iraq. Both that article and the Flag of Kurdistan article state that this is the correct flag for that reason. Someone searching this emoji is looking for either what it is (e.g. because they can't see it) or because they want to know more about the subject. In either case the current target takes people to the content they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Withdraw nom. Thanks for finding the code. I used that for searching and indeed per this it was supposed to be added in Apr 6, 2022. For some reason Emojipedia does not have that listed there. Gonnym (talk) 16:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Emojipedia contains errors and isn't as comprehensive as it should be, which is another reason it's important to keep these emoji redirects. Enix150 (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Side question: Should I be seeing something other than a blank black flag here (in Windows 10)?  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  A plain black flag is Windows' default display for a flag icon it doesn't understand (see also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 21#🏴󠁭󠁭󠀱󠀶󠁿). Lack of support for subnational flags is common at this point in time, and whether they should be supported by default is apparently contentious (so a yes/no answer to your question isn't simple). Rest assured though that this is not a problem with your system/browser. Thryduulf (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mary II of Hungary → Maria Theresa  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Totally unknown term. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Google finds only three instances of this exact term, 2 are related to this redirect and the third is a single speculative comment on Reddit. Thryduulf (talk) 11:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 13:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• ㊙ → wiktionary:Special:Search/㊙  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• ㊙️ → wiktionary:Special:Search/㊙️  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Very unclear why we would have Wiktionary redirects for non-Latin characters (or non-English words for that matter). Seems like a highly unlikely search term on enwiki. Fram (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note I've added ㊙️ to this discussion, it's the same character "U+3299 CIRCLED IDEOGRAPH SECRET" with a variation selector. Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. All single Unicode characters are plausible search terms on en.wp, but we don't seem to have any content about this one I can immediately find. Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • "All single Unicode characters are plausible search terms on en.wp": all 150,000? Why? Fram (talk) 12:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Because people search Wikipedia for information about them, and for at least the majority there is encyclopaedic information about the character and/or what it represents. Thryduulf (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • I highly doubt that, but I guess we'll just have to disagree on that. Fram (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or retarget. Don't delete.. Regarding ㊙️, that is an emoji and we already had a discussion that these should be kept. If the Wiktionary entry isn't a good target, redirect to Enclosed CJK Letters and Months. Gonnym (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the discussion can be found here for reference. Enix150 (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Following the pattern of the other similar emoji redirects (🉐, 🈹, 🈯, 🈶, 🈲, 🉑, 🈴, 🈳, 🈺, 🈵, & for some reason 🔞) and the redirects that are based on Unicode symbols (🈷️/🈷, ㊗️/㊗, 🈂️/🈂), I simply added the last one (㊙️/㊙). Enix150 (talk) 17:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  There was a long discussion about 🔞 in October-November last year that failed to come to a consensus about the best target. Discussing it again in another 6 months or so when there is no concurrent contentiousness about the concept of emoji redirects might prove more fruitful. Thryduulf (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Thryduulf: Yeah, it is probably wise to wait. I also saw this discussion arguing whether the R from emoji and other redirect templates should be placed there. Though I checked every single other (non-flag) emoji on Emojipedia's list to make sure each has a redirect and the official name in its template, and this is the sole outlier as it currently stands (other than the curious case of #️⃣/#). Enix150 (talk) 06:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Claudine (song) → Wu-Tang Clan discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No "Claudine" is mentioned at the target, nor are there any songs with this name mentioned at the Claudine (disambiguation) page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't find mention of a song, including in any of the album articles linked from Wu-Tang Clan discography. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm going down to South Park, gonna have myself a time. → South Park#Main theme  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned quote from the series' opening. Typing out the song would be implausible to get to this target. It also exists as a declined AfC draft at Draft:I'm going down to South Park, gonna have myself a time.. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Submission was declined from AfC as stated, this is a meaningless redirect that is highly unlikely to ever be used. - SanAnMan (talk) 14:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• My Man Freestyle → Drake (musician)#Family and relationships  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A freestyle done by Adonis Graham that was put at the end of one of Drake's tracks. While Adonis does get a mention at the page (one mention), "my man" does not appear in the article, nor is Adonis' freestyle ever alluded to. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Chaoxianzu in America → Chaoxianzu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Korean Chinese American → Chaoxianzu  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While there are other related articles such as Chaoxianzu in Korea and Chaoxianzu in Japan, there is not currently any content for Chaoxianzu in America, which currently was created as a redirect to the general Chaoxianzu article. However, this article does not particularly discuss America, nor the Chaoxianzu whom are there, making this redirect unhelpful to readers. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nicholas knife → Nick the Knife  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not an alternative name used as a synonym to the album title. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete while Nick is a diminutive form of Nicolas there is no evidence that the album has ever been known under this name.--67.70.103.36 (talk) 05:04, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Secret Playlist → List of TVING original programming  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Graduation (TV series) → List of TVING original programming  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Hide (TV series) → List of TVING original programming  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not show up at the target list of original programming, or anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have now bundled Graduation (TV series) (and now also Hide (TV series)) which meets the same criteria as Secret Playlist. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Confusing without a substantive mention. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Finding (franchise) → Finding Nemo (franchise)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This franchise is not referred to in the article (nor anywhere) as the "Finding franchise", even if it's a word that both movies share. It's a partial title match for the two movies that have come out, and this alternative name is not used in the article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Special:PrefixIndex/Finding. Too many "Finding [capital A-Z]" titles to know which one would be preferred. Steel1943 (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Does anyone actually refer to anything else on that page as "the Finding franchise"? Even if the answer is "yes", that's evidence in favor of disambiguation, not deletion. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 11:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Incorrect, disambiguation is for title matches, not title ambiguities, so deletion would have been the option that should be followed to allow search results ... if it weren't for others' new comments showing this may be a valid name for the target, which has resulted in me withdrawing my opinion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, unless it can be shown that there are other franchises that are referred to as «the Finding franchise» (or «"Finding" franchise»), in which case disambiguate. The claim that is it is «not referred to in the article (nor anywhere) as the "Finding franchise"» is bizarre and flatly contradicted by a cursory search. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @C. A. Russell:. This is the wrong way round. The redirect should exist only if there is evidence that this franchise is known solely as «the Finding franchise» (using your quotes). So if they're from reliable sources, put one or more of your quotes below as references in the article, and we're done. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Uh, no. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 01:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    No worries, Tavix took care of it. Steel1943 (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as generic given I've never heard it called just "Finding" and there are probably lots of media about finding things so is ambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Voting to delete on the grounds that you, personally, have "never heard it" called that before is a very odd response. And to reiterate, the basis factual basis of the nomination—that this franchise is not referred to in that way anywhere—is flat out untrue, as revealed with two seconds of Googling. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  A Google search for Finding franchise doesn't return any results for Nemo. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  You are being dishonest:

  • According to legend, the original film in the Finding franchise was green-lit with just one word, fish. "You had me at Fish" was apparently[...]

  • Hank the octopus, voiced by Ed O'Neill, is less comical than he is a charming, meaningful addition to the “Finding” franchise and[...]

  • [...] until it reaches the point that it returns to the jovial, wacky hi-jinks that we have come to expect from the 'Finding' franchise[...]

  • [...] we're talking about the "Finding" franchise, where the first film was an ode to fatherhood/single fatherhood [...]

  • [...] an animated film for the young audience, Pixar's Finding franchise has a certain element[...]

  ... etc. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 11:20, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "You are being dishonest". Nice WP:AGF failure. Could have been possible that Crouch, Swale did not search in the same manner you did, maybe different search engine or search term. Not sure, but seriously, lay off the WP:PAs. Steel1943 (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Oh, just noticed this editor is now indefinitely blocked. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Steel1943, I highly recommend the markblocked gadget, it makes it much easier to notice when an editor is blocked. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. In addition to a multitude of results from places like reddit, TV Tropes, IMBD, and C. A. Russel's finds 1 minute on Google got me [1], [2], [3], [4] and [5]. Thryduulf (talk) 14:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I have added a mention to the article given that sources have been found. I am intrigued by the claim that there are other franchises with the name, but I was unable to corroborate it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:02, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep since the franchise is now mentioned at the target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Infinity Saga epilogue → Spider-Man: Far From Home  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Total WP:OR WP:SYNTH not mentioned at the target article, nor wouldn't. It is not important for this film to be the epilogue of the "Infinity Saga", there are plenty of movies that have been made after the Saga ended that can be equally called an epilogue. This is not an alternative name for the movie nor a 1:1 search term. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This would be like having Phase 5 epilogue, and this is not a commonly sought after term. No ppint in keeping or redirecting to List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films#The Infinity Saga (where this and every other Saga entry is listed) given The Infinity Saga and Infinity Saga exist and are more likely to receive any traffic looking for the saga and its entries there. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a helpful or common search term. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Plebbit → Reddit#Controversies  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a controversy listed at the target. In fact, the term "plebbit" is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Unhelpful redirect. Delete. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neologism. WP:DICTIONARY. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 13:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No mention anywhere. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 17:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Grabahan → Ligma joke  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ligma variant not mentioned at the target article, or anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Delete. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I just added it as a ligma variant. It's part of the "deez nuts" meme family since that's the punchline. It's mentioned in one of the existing ligma sources. I could see someone being told about the war in Grabahan or the mass shooting in Grabahan and typing that in to Wikipedia. Or we could just have people learn the hard way. Cheers! BBQboffin^{grill me} 19:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per BBQboffin who added a sourced mention. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• RSCIT → Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Rscit → Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• RS-CIT → Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Rs-cit → Vardhaman Mahaveer Open University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unsourced acronym created from a number of disruptive page moves by a now banned individual. No reference to what "RSCIT" is on the page makes these redirects unhelpful and confusing. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no mention anywhere. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Gears of War Characters & Enemies → Gears of War#Setting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This used to point to a pretty hefty list of Gears of War characters, where the largest depository of page history now lies at the List of Gears of War characters redirect. There were quite a few redirects that used to point here, but after a 2020 BLAR, and a later presumed removal of content at the main Gears of War page, many of the redirects pointing here are scattered and misplaced. This is one example of such redirects. The Gears of War page does not have a list formatted at the page. While it might have characters, it most certainly does not contain a list of enemies. This is probably one of the less plausible "list of Gears of War characters" floating out there, with which there are many. An alternative to deletion would be restoring the List of Gears of War characters article and retargeting the rest of these stragglers there, but in the absence of that, they don't really have a great home at Gears of War either. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bhai The Gangster → Open world  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Draft:Bhai The Gangster → Open world  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seemingly no reason for this page to exist. Bundling in the draft-space version as well, which began as a redirect to open world before moving it to an article-space location. Open world games that don't have articles shouldn't be redirects to "open world". Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can’t imagine someone typing this a search term in order to learn about open world gaming in general.--67.70.103.36 (talk) 05:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dragetreneren → How to Train Your Dragon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:FORRED from Norwegian, who doesn't even have an article on the series (the page on the Norwegian wiki at this title is about the 2010 movie). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Milo (Demon Road) → Derek Landy#The Demon Road Trilogy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Used to be talked about on an article that no longer exists, as it was retargeted to the general page about the author. The character in question is left unaccounted for at the target page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• National Feminism → Feminazi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Created by a now-blocked user per WP:NOTHERE, the question becomes what to do with this redirect (a term not discussed or ever equated at the target page). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The only source I can find that equates these terms is a wiki whose article has a big banner proclaiming the subject to be a fictional ideology and which uses "Feminazi" is a completely different way to our article. In reliable sources, "national feminism" mostly seems to relate to feminist movements/organisations that are countrywide in a given country and/or which combine feminist and nationalist ideologies (for whatever "nationalist" means in the context of the relevant part of the world), most commonly in Cuba but far from exclusively so. As far as I've been able to find, we don't have an article about this/these concept(s). Thryduulf (talk) 12:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as simply an unlikely search term. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 13:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Feminazi is a combination of Feminism and Nazi. It's not a combination of Feminism and National Socialism. This doesn't seem to be an actual term and doesn't seem to be a likely search. GMG^talk 15:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete incorrect target -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 07:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore article without prejudice to AfD. Article was already restored by Spworld2 shortly after it was nominated here. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Majlis Al-Noor → Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect was BLAR'd and has history (which I've now marked), but I'm unsure whether there's a better target out there because it receives some other mentions, but none at its current target. If nothing is suitable, there's also the ability to restore and send to AfD, but I was hesitant about doing so before looking at other R targets. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep(restore). I agree with restoring it. It's not meant to be merged into another, the sources are more specific to it- --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 1:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• KENT PARK PS → Ferntree Gully, Victoria  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term. LibStar (talk) 02:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I've added a hatnote at Kent Park. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).