Entertainment desk
< June 6 << May | June | Jul >> June 8 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


June 7

Football club names[edit]

Most football clubs are named after a city. Some have another word after that. For example, United, City, Rovers, Wanderers, Athletic, Albion. Do these words have any special meaning and how does which word they use affect the club? --Kaypoh 06:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware that most of these terms have any specific meaning other than disambiguation amongst clubs located in the same city. In the case of Manchester United, for example, our article suggests that the name was chosen from several suggestions presented at a meeting, with no specific meaning.
For what it's worth, Albion is perhaps the most ancient name for the British Isles, used by Pliny to refer to what we would now call Great Britain. Carom 06:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The comment from jnestorius about Towns and Cities reminds me that Swansea Town F.C. changed their name to Swansea City F.C. when Swansea was granted city status. Hassocks5489 12:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It'd worth noting that Airbus UK F.C. has had six different names in the 60 years of its existence, as the ownership of the aircraft factory which it represents has changed. And then there's Newton Heath (Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway) F.C which found itself a shorter name when it ceased to be a works team... -- Arwel (talk) 07:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland has a rich diversity of club names, in addition to those mentioned above:

Rockpocket 20:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Football club names.  Sʟυмgυм • т  c  21:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a doctor (left) in House?[edit]

What's the story with all three House assistants quitting? Did the actors ask for too much money? Did the writers think the show was going stale? Has the series jumped the shark? What's the prognosis? Clarityfiend 07:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a season-ending cliffhanger, I'm sure all will be resolved in the first episode of next season.  :) Corvus cornix 17:13, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is a cliffhanger as well as a studio tool. The actors are now in the position that they don't have job security, so they won't ask for too much of a raise for the following season. I much prefer how Lost keeps the actors in line. They are happy to kill anyone off at any time. --Kainaw (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aah, a second opinion. (But beware, a malpractice lawsuit may be in the offing if you're wrong...) Clarityfiend 16:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]