User:86.146.241.58

86.146.241.58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report date January 21 2009, 20:31 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Melvinworks (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Takemcdown (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Referendem (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by MuZemike

Attempt at votestacking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastermind (Sparta). All abovementioned accounts !voted speedy keep in the AFD as noted [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5]. MuZemike 20:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I also sense quacking at this diff here. MuZemike 20:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

• I'm not a sockpuppet. You'll all being mean to User:MasterFiendSupreme. Melvinworks (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, he was a member of Sparta's senate, and I am sure he will be King one day, and I'm not a sockpuppet. Takemcdown (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree with Takemcdown and Melvinworks. Referendem (talk) 02:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

• Likeliest story is that this guy posted "Save my article!" in some forum and his buddies rallied to the rescue. I think they should still all be blocked because they're likely to get indignant when the article inevitably gets trashed, but making an SPA isn't necessarily a blockable offense, I guess. JuJube (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Made personal attacks against me when I attempted to speedy tag a recreated Mastermind (Sparta), 1 and 2. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:29, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I smell meatpuppetry.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 00:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requests

Checkuser request – code letter: C (Vote stacking affecting outcome )

Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: Given that the accounts seem to have gone to the trouble of playing silly games here, with tag team denials, and given that the vote stacking could, if it hadn't been spotted, have affected the outcome, added a RFCU request to settle the issue. Mayalld (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: This case was self endorsed by Clerk Mayalld. (Note made for transparency). Tiptoety ^talk 20:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

•  Confirmed the following as one:

1. Terrakyte (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
2. Melvinworks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
3. Referendem (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
4. Takemcdown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

IPs hardblocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 22:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked to confirm Nishkid's findings, and I concur totally with his conclusions. --Deskana (talk) 23:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Mayalld (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]