See below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Procedural filing based on CheckUser results and behavioural evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yogesh Khandke. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
User is recently returned from an SPI block and started edit warring and removal of Sourced Contents 1 and a Picture 2 about Pakistan victory in Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 (both are related the removed material,the removed sources and the picture was about pakistan Victory in 1965 war) with really blatent reasons, for which he was warned for Edit Warring by a user on his talk page 3, Since then he started warring logged out 4 and oversighted the details. Here i think determination can be made based on the accounts behaviour alone. Look 5
master Edit
Included the "Template:Di-no source" to delete the File، However i removed the template Because Source Information was Present in Picture Summary and the template itself state that Please remove this template if source information is provided. So I removed the template but after this
ip edit
an IP performed the same edit with same template and Oversighted the details. I want to request a deep analysis of this User. HIAS (talk) 20:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC) HIAS (talk) 20:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Daina has just 205 edits but behave like a Skilful Editor. I think there is a case of Block Evasion here.
Here are the Parallels:
Moreover, Daina has a history of Sock puppets, 'Daina's account was blocked on 5th May 2014 and -Ghatus- account was created on 30 May 2014'. Both of the users have Belligerent Attitude, Insistent Editing Pattern and Most Important do not forget to compare their language and Writing style . HIAS (talk) 15:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC) HIAS (talk) 15:11, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More info: @Philippe: Why would I retaliate if the SPI proved my Innocence and saved me from Unwanted threats, and just because of that i have never reported Daina on WP:AN . HIAS (talk) 08:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Here are some diffs about use of Same Phrase over and over,
Misrepresentation of Sources
These two accounts have generally very low levels of activity, but have recently shown a very surprising degree of coordination. Both have been blocked for socking previously, but Raymond3023's account has been twice unblocked on appeal (which itself I find odd; ARBCOM might be aware of some extenuating circumstances). The instances of coordination are on pages as far apart as this RfD, Marital rape in India, this AfD, the talk page of Racism, and this AN discussion. Furthermore, there is an odd conjunction between the peaks of D4iNa4's editing and the periods when Raymond3023 is active. I'm not certain a CU will find something: both these editors have had CUs run on them before (and were blocked as a result); but the evidence seems to me to be compelling enough to check. Vanamonde (talk) 07:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.