Jagzthebest (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Report date March 20 2010, 06:21 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Master Spiky (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Master Shan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• MasterSpider99 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 67.180.84.52 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Beyond My Ken

The three accounts listed had all been marked as suspected sockpuppets of indef blocked User:Jagzthebest, and the IP account removed each of those tags:

• removal from MasterSpider99
• removal from Master Shan
• first removal from Master Spiky
• second
• third
• fourth

which naturally raises concerns that the IP is Jagzthebest.

Except for a single edit in October 2007, the IP sprang to life ex nihilo on March 16th with full knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and nomenclature, as shown in their contributions list. This supports the possibility that this is a blocked editor evading a block via use of an IP. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )

Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

• All of these accounts, except the latest one, are  Stale and given the edit dates, there's not much of a case here, sorry - Alison ^❤ 07:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Administrator note I've blocked the last account per this edit. Even if it's not a sock it's clearly not here for constructive purposes. The IP I'm leaving unblocked, as its edits are mainly constructive. Leaving open in case anyone wants to take a second look. Tim Song (talk) 08:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: I concur with Tim Song in this case, marking as closed, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.