ObserverNY

ObserverNY (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date October 15 2009, 19:16 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by HelloAnnyong

Several weeks ago, 68.194 made this edit, and Observer later admitted that she had made the edit in an attempt to prove a point, and referred to it as her "silly game". Observer was later banned for incivility and other issues.

Recently, the IP made this edit. It's not a particularly significant edit, but that seems like block evasion to me. I brought this up at WP:ANI and was told to open an SPI. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

ObserverNY comments on "enrolled in vs attend" hereand edited anonymously on other pages here Most definitely is ObserverNY. Doesn’t matter if it is just a “grammar fix.” That IP needs to be blocked as well. La mome (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


Report date February 8 2010, 21:10 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by HelloAnnyong

Back in October 2009, ObserverNY (talk · contribs) was indef blocked for sockpuppeting as an IP and vandalizing as an IP to prove a point. Recently we've seen a bunch of edits by 68.194.254.7 on some articles where ObserverNY used to be active - namely IB Diploma Programme, International Baccalaureate and List of International Baccalaureate people. Further, ObserverNY first puppeted as 68.194.235.103, and now we're seeing edits from 68.194.254.7. The two addresses have the same subnet (68.194.0.0/16) and are from the same IP.

This seems to be a pretty straightforward case of block evasion. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 21:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

information Administrator note IP blocked 1 week. I cannot rangeblock as there are too many recent unrelated activity from other IPs. –MuZemike 00:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date March 26 2010, 00:13 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by HelloAnnyong

This IP was blocked in Feb 2010 before as a sock of ObserverNY. They recently made another edit on the page which was ObserverNY's main battleground. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 00:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: IP edited again. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Update: IP edited a third time. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence submitted by CinchBug

See this diff. ObserverNY is indef blocked and IP 68.194.254.7 was previously blocked for sockpuppetry on a related article. • CinchBug • 00:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: Merged from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/68.194.254.7. Elockid (Talk) 00:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Recommend hard block of IP for another three months. Auntie E. (talk) 01:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 3 months. –MuZemike 19:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
28 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by HelloAnnyong

This anon IP has been previously confirmed as ObserverNY. The IP has been blocked several times - first for 31 hours, then a week, then three months - and ObserverNY always comes back and edits again on the same page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Please do something about this, as the problem continues.Tvor65 (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

information Administrator note Blocked 6 months. Elockid (Talk) 12:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.


04 October 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by TFOWR

Signed as "ONY" in this edit, all other edits are to IB articles. Note that I've already blocked per WP:DUCK: I'm reporting this "for the record". TFOWR 19:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
More