- The Side566 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
12 May 2024
– An administrator or SPI clerk requires more information to determine what action to take.
Suspected sockpuppets
Mass creation of unsourced stub articles for non-notable songs by various artists, which end up being converted to redirects or nominated for deletion. Failing to WP:ENGAGE with other editors at their talk page, and apparently not caring about the consequences of their problematic edits. CycloneYoris talk! 22:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Check declined by a checkuser - The Side566 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is probably
Stale, so there would be nothing to compare the other account to. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Additional information needed CycloneYoris, in order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
- At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
- At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
- In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Spicy (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]