WWEJobber

WWEJobber (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
21 December 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


User:Nomelck was created the day after (9/16) User:WWEJobber was blocked. Their viewpoints on talk pages are very similar, as is their use of syntax in English on certain pages, namely List of WWE personnel. Kjscotte34 (talk) 14:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Alright, I'm going to do this in chronological order. Background info - Before September 2012, WWEJobber blocked twice in March 2011 for edit warring, once in March 2012 for disruptive page-move warring. Fast forward to September 2012. Conflict on List of WWE personnel between WWEJobber, Vjmlhds and Keith Okamoto starts around 10 September to 17 September on the article and also at Talk:List of WWE personnel/Archive 17#Double listing, Talk:List of WWE personnel/Archive 17#Consensus.

15 September, WWEJobber Timelog: edits on 02:28, 02:28, 02:39, 03:59, 04:01, 04:31. Nomelck's (could I check when Nomelck was created) first edits: 15 September 02:38, (11 edits in between 02:39 to 03:46), 03:46. Right "between" WWEJobber's editing range when he was "silent" from 02:39 to 03:59. Out of all these edits, WWEJobber and Nomelck both vote "Agree" on a merge discussion regarding Vince McMahon. 17:05-18:02, WWEJobber makes several edits to WWE articles. 20:43, WWEJobber edits with the summary "Shares of a company are not ownership stake. You can discuss everything that you want with me, but not this, 'coz I have a bachelor's degree in Management. Stay in you place." 20:48-20:52, Nomelck makes some very, very minor edits to Igarassu. 20:49-21:18, WWEJobber is editing WWE articles again. 21:27, in the last edit before being blocked on 15 September, WWEJobber removes talk page information on NiciVampireHeart reporting him for edit warring, removes small conflict with MrMoustacheMM, removes notice of block by HJ Mitchell for extremely disruptive combative page-move warring. Also barely two days earlier on September 13, WWEJobber removed an edit warring warning from Dcheagle.

15 September 21:32, WWEJobber blocked for edit warring after being reported by Keith Okamoto. At 21:49, Nomelck, back online again and not even a day-old account, reports Vjmlhds (as said above, in conflict with WWEJobber) for edit warring and 3RR. Nomelck later claimed it was unfair WWEJobber was blocked but not Vjmlhds. After 15 September, Nomelck goes silent, until...

19 November. WWEJobber has returned for some time, and WWEJobber and myself are arguing on different sides at Talk:NXT Wrestling#Merge NXT articles together. I make the comment at 19 November 10:52: "We clearly need people to take sides here (KO and Srsrox?). I'm going to PM people from the WP:PW project to get them to choose." WWEJobber responds on 19 November 16:14. On 20 November 2012, 02:46, Nomelck posts on the talk page, agreeing with WWEJobber. WWEJobber's last edit was minutes earlier at 20 November 02:02.

Also on 19 November, WWEJobber and Vjmlhds edit on whether to name Vince McMahon with the middle name 'K.' or not. Vjmlhds removes the K. Next edit, WWEJobber adds the K. 20 November 03:37, Nomelck comments at Talk:List of WWE personnel#Vince McMahon, supporting the addition of the "K." which was WWEJobber's position. WWEJobber commented on that same "thread" at 20 November 01:49. At 20 November 04:01, WWEJobber starts editing again.

13 December 02:11 Nomelck makes its final edit so far, agreeing with WWEJobber yet again in a discussion... "The guy could be a pain, but he is right in this case..." WWEJobber's last edit before Nomelck's was at 22:18 12 December.

In conclusion, just by looking at Nomelck's contributions, I cannot see how a person would edit on three separate days within the last four months, and on every single day he edits he agrees with WWEJobber on a professional wrestling talk page, yet this person has never even edited a single professional wrestling page but only talk pages. Suspicious, is it not? That's what I have for now. Starship.paint (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Check declined by a checkuser. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.

--(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 03:38, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The two of them appear Red X Unrelated. Despite that, I find it a bit of a coincidence that two the of them are both from the same country (Brazil) and have the same ISP. The population of Brazil is quite large however, so that means very little. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 17:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More