The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Italways[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Italways (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Hugh shakespeare (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

WegianWarrior 08:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Suspected sockpuppet based on the extreme simularities in style and articles between this users edits and the edits of other sockpuppets of Italways:

Comments

I'm reviewing, though I have to say I'm a bit confused what benefit there is in listing Italways (talk · contribs) as the "sockmaster" as that account has no contributions. It's a heck of a lot easier to investigate this stuff if the listed accounts actually have edits to review (and yes I see the provided diffs; I'm just saying additional "sock" accounts with contributions would help the investigation).--Isotope23 talk 17:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Per the duck test; this editor is pretty clearly tied to the above accounts and has been blocked accordingly.--Isotope23 talk 18:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As Isotope23 wrote, both users are indef-blocked. A checkuser case is ongoing. Shalom (HelloPeace) 13:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]