The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NWA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The only use this template has is to transclude on to multiple articles, and the ones I found were being used inappropriatly. This is a template of only one image and the image is non-free content. — Moe ε 20:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFCC#9. The template has no use otherwise. mattbr 17:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The only use this template has is to transclude on to multiple articles, and the ones I found were being used inappropriatly. This is a template of only one image and the image is non-free content. — Moe ε 20:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFCC#9. The template has no use otherwise. mattbr 17:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Attempt at a fork. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wimbledon tournaments (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Template is redundant; see Template:Wimbledon Championships for a complete version of this template. Totalinarian 16:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree with this request. The template only became redundant after Totalinarian (talk · contribs) eliminated the clean separation between the amateur-era Wimbledon and the Open-era Wimbledon templates. If you believe this template should be deleted, you should take up the point at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis and try to reach consensus, rather than changing all the slam articles without discussion. --dantheox 03:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Copy to Wikinews (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per Wikinews:Copyrights, content cannot be transwikied from here to Wikinews. Hence this template shouldn't exist. MER-C 12:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete incompatible licensing between projects. -N 17:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - impossible. For now. (And probably indefinitely.) Gracenotes^T § 22:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nothing can be copied due to to licence incompatibility. mattbr 18:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete Per User:N. FunPika 13:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abbots (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused template, consisting only of two parameters - a "title" and a "place" - joined together by the template with an "of" and ended with a ".". It's far easier to type "title of place." than it is ((subst:Abbots|title|place)) (or worse, ((subst:Abbots|title=title|place=place))). Overtemplatization? Delete. Mike Peel 07:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, does not appear to be needed. CSD criteria G1 or G2 might be applicable here. Gracenotes^T § 22:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMU taxobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The only page that transcludes this template is itself - it's a nice little closed loop. Presumably was once the infobox on American Military University, in which case it's been superceded by Template:Infobox University. Delete. Mike Peel 07:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't think it has ever been used as the only significant edit made it transclude itself, so it has no useful purpose. mattbr 18:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.