The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Slender (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Links to only two pages, despite appearing to have three. WP:NENAN. ZappaOMati 15:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 17:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Two article don't need a navbox. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indian patriotic films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Who determines which films are patriotic and which aren't? Not an objective measure. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.64.67.39 (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its just similar to how Patriotic songs are determined. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It makes no more sense to link together Indian patriotic films as it would to link all American political films or French romance films. The subject matter of a film should not be the subject of a navigation box. It may make sense to convert this to a category, but there is no need for a navigation box. BOVINEBOY2008 02:37, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, too subjective. Frietjes (talk) 17:12, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rail start evb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant custom ((S-rail)) header, replaced by standard ((S-rail|title=EVB)) and succession templates ((EVB color)), ((EVB lines)), ((EVB stations)), ((S-line/EVB left/Bremerhaven-Hamburg)) and ((S-line/EVB right/Bremerhaven-Hamburg)). Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rail start Malaysia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant custom ((S-rail)) header, replaced by standard Malaysia rail transport templates. Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rail start Sri Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused custom ((S-rail)) header, replaceable by standard templates ((S-start)) and ((S-rail|title=Sri Lanka Railways)). Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I am the editor who created this template and support it's deletion as it is not being used on any article. All the articles where I placed this template have been replaced by ((S-start)) and ((S-rail|title=Sri Lanka Railways)).--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 14:38, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.