Relegated French side templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Both Bourg-en-Bresse and Narbonne were relegated at the end of the 2021-22 season, and now play in non-notable leagues, so their current squad templates are no longer needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Dissolved rugby union current squad templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Current squad templates for teams that no longer compete in notable divisions (both American sides have folded, Worcester and Wasps will no longer be in notable divisions) so the templates are no longer needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if either Worcester or Wasps come back in the Championship the templates can be recreated quite easily. Similarly the MLR squads if new teams emerge as successors.Skeene88 (talk) 14:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Aashish Jung (आशिष जंग)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
appears to be an attempt to create an article in template space. Draft:Aashish Jung already exists. lettherebedarklight〔晚安 おやすみ〕ping me when replying 06:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete via WP:G6. Created in wrong namespace, and potential move target already exists in a similar form. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- (found this via WP:TH#Creating Article Page): delete, potentially speedy:Draft article created in the wrong namespace, and from what I can see Draft:Aashish Jung doesn't realy contain anything less apart from the fact that the books in the "Bibliography" section are not linked and that the hints for the see also section from Template:Biography where removed. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).