In the media

Irish legislative editing; coffee quarrel; more sports vandalism

Jim Walsh biography: Wikipedia's revenge?

In a follow-up to an earlier story describing how an IP traced to Ireland's legislature, the Oireachtas, had removed controversial content from the biography of Irish politician Jim Walsh (see previous Signpost coverage), the Irish Independent reports (Sept. 27) that Jim Walsh has admitted making the edits, saying he believed "a person from the gay lobby groups" had edited his biography.

More than half of Walsh's 950-word biography is currently focused on "controversies" relating to his views about gay marriage and civil partnerships, including a 90-word paragraph about his attempt to remove related material from his biography.

Walsh made his comments to the Sunday Times, which provided further examples of politicians editing their own entries. AK

The flat white

A flat white with latte art

The Sydney Morning Herald reports (Sept. 27) on a long-running argument over whether the flat white was invented in Australia or New Zealand. The Wikipedia article has repeatedly flip-flopped between the two theories. The Herald quotes Australian Alan Preston complaining about his putative New Zealand adversaries:

“

They control the Wikipedia page [...] I go back in and change it and the next day they go back in.

Tourism Australia is aware of this and sympathetic to my story.

”

Since the Herald article (also carried by other outlets including the Brisbane Times and goodfood.com.au) has appeared, there has been another flurry of edits in the article, and the Australian claim is – for now – in the ascendancy. AK

When trolls attack

Lane Kiffin

Sports site Fansided reports (Sept. 24) on edits made to the Wikipedia biography of Lane Kiffin, repeating various rumors currently circulating in social media about Kiffin's private life and his continued employment as a member of the coaching staff for the University of Alabama's Crimson Tide football team.

Fansided's Stu White was not impressed:

“

[...] the Wikipedia trolls are out in full force, facts be damned. [...]

Living in a world where one of the biggest and most important sources of information can be altered to reflect unsubstantiated rumors is quite a trip. Remember that the next time one of your buddies tries to settle an argument by pulling up a Wikipedia page on his or her phone.

”

White also criticized some of the edits for their inherent sexism. AK

Non-profits, venues and businesses edit-a-thon in South Bend

The Union Station Technology Center in South Bend, Indiana, location of the Wikipedia edit-a-thon

The South Bend Tribune notes (Sept. 26) a Wikipedia editing event organized by the "South Bend Office of Innovation and enFocus, in partnership with the St. Joseph County Chamber of Commerce and University of Notre Dame Hesburgh Libraries".

The event, which took place this Tuesday, aimed "to teach residents how to edit Wikipedia pages to increase the representation of South Bend non-profits, venues, and businesses online".

Local TV station WSBT-TV covered the edit-a-thon (Sept. 29). AK

In brief

Clinton Global Initiative: Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Lila Tretikov was on the list of speakers for the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) 2015 Annual Meeting (Sept. 26–29). AK
Wiki Loves Monuments: Israeli news site Arutz Sheva highlights (Sept. 27) the international Wiki Loves Monuments photo competition. Noting that upheaval like the current situation in Syria often leads to the destruction of heritage sites, Dror Lin of Wikimedia Israel explained to Arutz Sheva: "the images are meant to preserve our culture." AK
NSA lawsuit's day in court: Outlets including the Baltimore Sun, The Guardian and usnews.com report on the NSA lawsuit's first day in court (Sept. 25). The Obama administration has asked that the case, brought by a coalition of organizations including the Wikimedia Foundation, be dismissed, arguing that it was "speculative" and the plaintiffs lacked standing; lawyers representing the plaintiffs have asked the judge to rule against this request. The judge's ruling on the motion to dismiss is expected in a few weeks' time. The Wikimedia Foundation also provided a write-up on its blog (Sept. 28). AK

Do you want to contribute to "In the media" by writing a story or even just an "in brief" item? Edit next week's edition in the Newsroom or contact the editor.

← Previous "In the media"

Next "In the media" →

In this issue

In the media

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

It's notable that we cover Walsh's editing in his (short) article, which, as I remarked on the talk page may well be WP:UNDUE. It's also of note that the article misrepresented what he had said, and it does not seem unlikely that the text was inserted by a political opponent. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC).Reply[reply]
- Thanks for looking into it. One of the downsides of Wikipedia, and of much Wikipedia reporting in the press, is that "politician edits own biography" is an instant headline, whereas "unknown political opponent acting under Wikipedia's cover of anonymity squats on politician's biography for months to make them look bad" isn't. Andreas JN 466 00:08, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  - Another important point is that edit warring is newsworthy, but absence of edit warring is not. I monitor several thousand pages, and on those pages edit warring is pretty much non existent. So edit warring is very much the exception rather than the rule. Bahnfrend (talk) 03:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I too see little of it in my thousands, but seeing someone else being clearly, consistently vigilant is grounds for unwatching. Thus, I watch few controversial ones. Perhaps someone has formally studied a less biased sample. Jim.henderson (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's your Signpost. You can help us.

Home

About