This article may overuse or misuse color, making it hard to understand for color-blind users. Please remove or fix instances of distracting or hard-to-read colors or remove colored links that may impede user ability to distinguish links from regular text, or color links for purely aesthetic reasons. See the guides to editing for accessibility at contrast and colors. (August 2023)
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "1984 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1984. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.

Reasons

  Delivered the Court's reason
  Joined the Court's reason
  Filed a concurrence
  Joined a concurrence
  Filed a dissent
  Joined a dissent
  Filed a concurrence/dissent
  Joined a concurrence/dissent
  Did not participate in the judgment
  Did not participate in the final disposition of the judgment
  Not a member of the Court at the time of hearing or delivering
  • Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram.
  • Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.
  • Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or delivered.
  • Decisions that are given orally from the bench are denoted by a "V"; per coram decisions delivered orally from the bench only note a "V" on the most senior justice on the panel.
  • An asterisk ( * ) in the Court's opinion denotes that it was only a majority in part or a plurality.
Case name Argued Decided Laskin[a] Dickson[b] Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain[c]
Beaudoin-Daigneault v Richard, 1984 CanLII 15, [1984] 1 SCR 2 15 March 1983 2 February 1984
Parrot v Thompson et al, 1984 CanLII 118, [1984] 1 SCR 57 31 October 1983 2 February 1984
Desgagné v Fabrique de la paroisse St-Philippe d'Arvida, 1984 CanLII 129, [1984] 1 SCR 19 17 March 1982 2 February 1984
R v Isaac, 1984 CanLII 130, [1984] 1 SCR 74 19 October 1983 2 February 1984
Telecommunications Workers' Union v. British Columbia Ferry Corporation, 1984 CanLII 131, [1984] 1 SCR 83 13 February 1984 13 February 1984 V
McKibbon v R, 1984 CanLII 67, [1984] 1 SCR 131 18 May 1983 8 March 1984
Reference re Newfoundland Continental Shelf, 1984 CanLII 132, [1984] 1 SCR 86 22–24 February 1983 (1983-02-22 – 1983-02-24) 8 March 1984
Droste v R, 1984 CanLII 68, [1984] 1 SCR 208 2 November 1983 2 April 1984
The Queen v. Ancio, 1984 CanLII 69, [1984] 1 SCR 225 8 November 1983 2 April 1984
Bibeault v McCaffrey, 1984 CanLII 133, [1984] 1 SCR 176 1 November 1983 2 April 1984
Brown v Baugh et al, 1984 CanLII 134, [1984] 1 SCR 192 2 February 1984 2 April 1984
National Bank of Canada v. Retail Clerks' International Union et al, 1984 CanLII 2, [1984] 1 SCR 269 30 November 1984 3 May 1984 [d]
Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker, 1984 CanLII 3, [1984] 1 SCR 357 23–24 February 1984 (1984-02-23 – 1984-02-24) 3 May 1984
Reference re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, 1984 CanLII 17, [1984] 1 SCR 297 28 September – 1 October 1982 (1982-09-28 – 1982-10-01) 3 May 1984
R v Garlow, 1984 CanLII 71, [1984] 1 SCR 386 3 May 1984 3 May 1984 V
Case name Argued Decided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain
Chiasson v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 136, [1984] 1 SCR 266 13 March 1984 3 May 1984
Hartel Holdings Co Ltd v City of Calgary, CanLII , [1984] 1 SCR 337 28–29 September 1983 (1983-09-28 – 1983-09-29) 3 May 1984
Farr v Farr, 1984 CanLII 2754, [1984] 1 SCR 252 29–30 November 1983 (1983-11-29 – 1983-11-30) 3 May 1984
Kane v R, CanLII , [1984] 1 SCR 387 14 May 1984 14 May 1984 V
Reference re: Ownership of the Bed of the Strait of Georgia and Related Areas, 1984 CanLII 138, [1984] 1 SCR 388 26–28 October 1982 (1982-10-26 – 1982-10-28) 17 May 1984
Canadian Merchant Service Guild v Gagnon et al, 1984 CanLII 18, [1984] 1 SCR 509 13 March 1984 7 June 1984
Stubart Investments Ltd v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 20, [1984] 1 SCR 536 23–24 November 1983 (1983-11-23 – 1983-11-24) 7 June 1984
Langlois v Ministère de la Justice du Québec, 1984 CanLII 139, [1984] 1 SCR 472 14 March 1984 7 June 1984
R v Wis Development Corporation Ltd et al, 1984 CanLII 140, [1984] 1 SCR 485 13 December 1983 7 June 1984
Smith v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 141, [1984] 1 SCR 582 7 June 1984 7 June 1984 V
James Richardson & Sons v M.N.R., 1984 CanLII 1, [1984] 1 SCR 614 11 October 1983 21 June 1984
Consumers Distributing Co v Seiko, 1984 CanLII 73, [1984] 1 SCR 583 23 November 1983 21 June 1984
Kamloops v Nielsen, 1984 CanLII 21, [1984] 2 SCR 2 22 November 1982 26 July 1984
Skogman v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 22, [1984] 2 SCR 93 22 November 1982 26 July 1984
AG (Que) v. Quebec Protestant School Boards, 1984 CanLII 32, [1984] 2 SCR 66 21–22 February 1984 (1984-02-21 – 1984-02-22) 26 July 1984
Case name Argued Decided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain
Khan v R, 1984 CanLII 74, [1984] 2 SCR 62 19 June 1984 26 July 1984
Gould v Attorney General of Canada, 1984 CanLII 142, [1984] 2 SCR 124 4 September 1984 4 September 1984 V
Hunter et al v Southam Inc, 1984 CanLII 33, [1984] 2 SCR 145 22 November 1983 17 September 1984
Royal Bank of Canada v First Pioneer Investments, 1984 CanLII 75, [1984] 2 SCR 125 9–10 November 1983 (1983-11-09 – 1983-11-10) 17 September 1984
Maroukis v Maroukis, 1984 CanLII 76, [1984] 2 SCR 137 5 May 1984 17 September 1984
Ogg-Moss v R, 1984 CanLII 77, [1984] 2 SCR 173 3 November 1983 17 September 1984
Nixon v R, 1984 CanLII 78, [1984] 2 SCR 197 3 November 1983 17 September 1984
Phoenix Assurance v Bird Construction, 1984 CanLII 79, [1984] 2 SCR 199 15 June 1983 17 September 1984
Perka v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 23, [1984] 2 SCR 232 31 January – 1 February 1984 (1984-01-31 – 1984-02-01) 11 October 1984
Ken Gordon Excavating v Edstan Construction, 1984 CanLII 80, [1984] 2 SCR 280 16–17 May 1984 (1984-05-16 – 1984-05-17) 11 October 1984
Miller v Miller, 1984 CanLII 81, [1984] 2 SCR 310 3 October 1984 11 October 1984
Wildman v R, 1984 CanLII 82, [1984] 2 SCR 311 2 May 1984 11 October 1984
R v Brese, CanLII , [1984] 2 SCR 333 31 October 1984 31 October 1984 V
Guerin v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 25, [1984] 2 SCR 335 13–14 June 1983 (1983-06-13 – 1983-06-14) 1 November 1984
Reilly v. R, 1984 CanLII 83, [1984] 2 SCR 396 2 November 1983 1 November 1984
Case name Argued Decided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain
Osborne v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 119, [1984] 2 SCR 406 1 November 1984 1 November 1984 V
Syndicat des employés de production du Québec v CLRB, 1984 CanLII 26, [1984] 2 SCR 412 1–2 February 1983 (1983-02-01 – 1983-02-02) 22 November 1984
Blanchard v Control Data Canada Ltd, 1984 CanLII 27, [1984] 2 SCR 476 15 March 1984 22 November 1984
Cardinal v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 112, [1984] 2 SCR 523 22 November 1984 22 November 1984 V
Radulesco v Canadian Human Rights Commission, 1984 CanLII 120, [1984] 2 SCR 407 23 October 1984 22 November 1984
British Columbia Development Corporation v Friedmann (Ombudsman), 1984 CanLII 121, [1984] 2 SCR 447 30 January 1984 22 November 1984
Attorney General of Quebec v Udeco Inc et al, 1984 CanLII 122, [1984] 2 SCR 502 23–24 May 1984 (1984-05-23 – 1984-05-24) 22 November 1984
R v Sophonow, 1984 CanLII 124, [1984] 2 SCR 524 10 December 1984 10 December 1984 V
Goldwax v Montréal (City of), 1984 CanLII 125, [1984] 2 SCR 525 12 December 1984 12 December 1984 V
Nadeau v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 28, [1984] 2 SCR 570 21 November 1984 13 December 1984
Abbas v R, 1984 CanLII 84, [1984] 2 SCR 526 5 June 1984 13 December 1984
Attorney General (Ontario) v Fatehi, 1984 CanLII 85, [1984] 2 SCR 536 22 June 1984 13 December 1984
Duhamel v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 126, [1984] 2 SCR 555 2 February 1984 13 December 1984
Minister of Employment and Immigration et al v Jiminez-Perez et al, 1984 CanLII 127, [1984] 2 SCR 565 21–22 November 1984 (1984-11-21 – 1984-11-22) 13 December 1984
AG (Que) v Greater Hull School Board, 1984 CanLII 29, [1984] 2 SCR 575 20–21 June 1984 (1984-06-20 – 1984-06-21) 20 December 1984
Case name Argued Decided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain
Lyons v The Queen, 1984 CanLII 30, [1984] 2 SCR 633 23 June 1984 20 December 1984
Wiretap Reference, 1984 CanLII 31, [1984] 2 SCR 697 26–27 March 1984 (1984-03-26 – 1984-03-27) 20 December 1984
Caldwell et al v Stuart et al, 1984 CanLII 128, [1984] 2 SCR 603 15–16 February 1984 (1984-02-15 – 1984-02-16) 20 December 1984

Notes

  1. ^ died in office on 26 March 1984
  2. ^ appointed Chief Justice on 18 April 1984
  3. ^ appointed on 29 May 1984
  4. ^ filed additional reasons (joined by Estey, McIntyre, Lamer and Wilson JJ)
Categories