In mechanics and geometry, the 3D rotation group, often denoted SO(3), is the group of all rotations about the origin of three-dimensional Euclidean space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ under the operation of composition.^[1]

By definition, a rotation about the origin is a transformation that preserves the origin, Euclidean distance (so it is an isometry), and orientation (i.e., handedness of space). Composing two rotations results in another rotation, every rotation has a unique inverse rotation, and the identity map satisfies the definition of a rotation. Owing to the above properties (along composite rotations' associative property), the set of all rotations is a group under composition.

Every non-trivial rotation is determined by its axis of rotation (a line through the origin) and its angle of rotation. Rotations are not commutative (for example, rotating R 90° in the x-y plane followed by S 90° in the y-z plane is not the same as S followed by R), making the 3D rotation group a nonabelian group. Moreover, the rotation group has a natural structure as a manifold for which the group operations are smoothly differentiable, so it is in fact a Lie group. It is compact and has dimension 3.

Rotations are linear transformations of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ and can therefore be represented by matrices once a basis of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ has been chosen. Specifically, if we choose an orthonormal basis of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$, every rotation is described by an orthogonal 3 × 3 matrix (i.e., a 3 × 3 matrix with real entries which, when multiplied by its transpose, results in the identity matrix) with determinant 1. The group SO(3) can therefore be identified with the group of these matrices under matrix multiplication. These matrices are known as "special orthogonal matrices", explaining the notation SO(3).

The group SO(3) is used to describe the possible rotational symmetries of an object, as well as the possible orientations of an object in space. Its representations are important in physics, where they give rise to the elementary particles of integer spin.

Length and angle

Besides just preserving length, rotations also preserve the angles between vectors. This follows from the fact that the standard dot product between two vectors u and v can be written purely in terms of length:

$${\displaystyle \mathbf {u} \cdot \mathbf {v} ={\frac {1}{2))\left(\|\mathbf {u} +\mathbf {v} \|^{2}-\|\mathbf {u} \|^{2}-\|\mathbf {v} \|^{2}\right).}$$

It follows that every length-preserving linear transformation in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ preserves the dot product, and thus the angle between vectors. Rotations are often defined as linear transformations that preserve the inner product on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$, which is equivalent to requiring them to preserve length. See classical group for a treatment of this more general approach, where SO(3) appears as a special case.

Orthogonal and rotation matrices

Every rotation maps an orthonormal basis of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ to another orthonormal basis. Like any linear transformation of finite-dimensional vector spaces, a rotation can always be represented by a matrix. Let R be a given rotation. With respect to the standard basis e₁, e₂, e₃ of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ the columns of R are given by (Re₁, Re₂, Re₃). Since the standard basis is orthonormal, and since R preserves angles and length, the columns of R form another orthonormal basis. This orthonormality condition can be expressed in the form

${\displaystyle R^{\mathsf {T))R=RR^{\mathsf {T))=I,}$

where R^T denotes the transpose of R and I is the 3 × 3 identity matrix. Matrices for which this property holds are called orthogonal matrices. The group of all 3 × 3 orthogonal matrices is denoted O(3), and consists of all proper and improper rotations.

In addition to preserving length, proper rotations must also preserve orientation. A matrix will preserve or reverse orientation according to whether the determinant of the matrix is positive or negative. For an orthogonal matrix R, note that det R^T = det R implies (det R)² = 1, so that det R = ±1. The subgroup of orthogonal matrices with determinant +1 is called the special orthogonal group, denoted SO(3).

Thus every rotation can be represented uniquely by an orthogonal matrix with unit determinant. Moreover, since composition of rotations corresponds to matrix multiplication, the rotation group is isomorphic to the special orthogonal group SO(3).

Improper rotations correspond to orthogonal matrices with determinant −1, and they do not form a group because the product of two improper rotations is a proper rotation.

Group structure

The rotation group is a group under function composition (or equivalently the product of linear transformations). It is a subgroup of the general linear group consisting of all invertible linear transformations of the real 3-space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$.^[2]

Furthermore, the rotation group is nonabelian. That is, the order in which rotations are composed makes a difference. For example, a quarter turn around the positive x-axis followed by a quarter turn around the positive y-axis is a different rotation than the one obtained by first rotating around y and then x.

The orthogonal group, consisting of all proper and improper rotations, is generated by reflections. Every proper rotation is the composition of two reflections, a special case of the Cartan–Dieudonné theorem.

Complete classification of finite subgroups

The finite subgroups of ${\displaystyle \mathrm {SO} (3)}$ are completely classified.^[3]

Every finite subgroup is isomorphic to either an element of one of two countably infinite families of planar isometries: the cyclic groups ${\displaystyle C_{n))$ or the dihedral groups ${\displaystyle D_{2n))$, or to one of three other groups: the tetrahedral group ${\displaystyle \cong A_{4))$, the octahedral group ${\displaystyle \cong S_{4))$, or the icosahedral group ${\displaystyle \cong A_{5))$.

Axis of rotation

Every nontrivial proper rotation in 3 dimensions fixes a unique 1-dimensional linear subspace of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ which is called the axis of rotation (this is Euler's rotation theorem). Each such rotation acts as an ordinary 2-dimensional rotation in the plane orthogonal to this axis. Since every 2-dimensional rotation can be represented by an angle φ, an arbitrary 3-dimensional rotation can be specified by an axis of rotation together with an angle of rotation about this axis. (Technically, one needs to specify an orientation for the axis and whether the rotation is taken to be clockwise or counterclockwise with respect to this orientation).

For example, counterclockwise rotation about the positive z-axis by angle φ is given by

${\displaystyle R_{z}(\phi )={\begin{bmatrix}\cos \phi &-\sin \phi &0\\\sin \phi &\cos \phi &0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix)).}$

Given a unit vector n in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ and an angle φ, let R(φ, n) represent a counterclockwise rotation about the axis through n (with orientation determined by n). Then

• R(0, n) is the identity transformation for any n
• R(φ, n) = R(−φ, −n)
• R(π + φ, n) = R(π − φ, −n).

Using these properties one can show that any rotation can be represented by a unique angle φ in the range 0 ≤ φ ≤ π and a unit vector n such that

• n is arbitrary if φ = 0
• n is unique if 0 < φ < π
• n is unique up to a sign if φ = π (that is, the rotations R(π, ±n) are identical).

In the next section, this representation of rotations is used to identify SO(3) topologically with three-dimensional real projective space.

Topology

The Lie group SO(3) is diffeomorphic to the real projective space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{3}(\mathbb {R} ).}$^[4]

Consider the solid ball in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ of radius π (that is, all points of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ of distance π or less from the origin). Given the above, for every point in this ball there is a rotation, with axis through the point and the origin, and rotation angle equal to the distance of the point from the origin. The identity rotation corresponds to the point at the center of the ball. Rotation through an angle 𝜃 between 0 and π (not including either) are on the same axis at the same distance. Rotation through angles between 0 and −π correspond to the point on the same axis and distance from the origin but on the opposite side of the origin. The one remaining issue is that the two rotations through π and through −π are the same. So we identify (or "glue together") antipodal points on the surface of the ball. After this identification, we arrive at a topological space homeomorphic to the rotation group.

Indeed, the ball with antipodal surface points identified is a smooth manifold, and this manifold is diffeomorphic to the rotation group. It is also diffeomorphic to the real 3-dimensional projective space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{3}(\mathbb {R} ),}$ so the latter can also serve as a topological model for the rotation group.

These identifications illustrate that SO(3) is connected but not simply connected. As to the latter, in the ball with antipodal surface points identified, consider the path running from the "north pole" straight through the interior down to the south pole. This is a closed loop, since the north pole and the south pole are identified. This loop cannot be shrunk to a point, since no matter how it is deformed, the start and end point have to remain antipodal, or else the loop will "break open". In terms of rotations, this loop represents a continuous sequence of rotations about the z-axis starting (by example) at the identity (center of the ball), through the south pole, jumping to the north pole and ending again at the identity rotation (i.e., a series of rotation through an angle φ where φ runs from 0 to 2π).

Surprisingly, running through the path twice, i.e., running from the north pole down to the south pole, jumping back to the north pole (using the fact that north and south poles are identified), and then again running from the north pole down to the south pole, so that φ runs from 0 to 4π, gives a closed loop which can be shrunk to a single point: first move the paths continuously to the ball's surface, still connecting north pole to south pole twice. The second path can then be mirrored over to the antipodal side without changing the path at all. Now we have an ordinary closed loop on the surface of the ball, connecting the north pole to itself along a great circle. This circle can be shrunk to the north pole without problems. The plate trick and similar tricks demonstrate this practically.

The same argument can be performed in general, and it shows that the fundamental group of SO(3) is the cyclic group of order 2 (a fundamental group with two elements). In physics applications, the non-triviality (more than one element) of the fundamental group allows for the existence of objects known as spinors, and is an important tool in the development of the spin–statistics theorem.

The universal cover of SO(3) is a Lie group called Spin(3). The group Spin(3) is isomorphic to the special unitary group SU(2); it is also diffeomorphic to the unit 3-sphere S³ and can be understood as the group of versors (quaternions with absolute value 1). The connection between quaternions and rotations, commonly exploited in computer graphics, is explained in quaternions and spatial rotations. The map from S³ onto SO(3) that identifies antipodal points of S³ is a surjective homomorphism of Lie groups, with kernel {±1}. Topologically, this map is a two-to-one covering map. (See the plate trick.)

Connection between SO(3) and SU(2)

In this section, we give two different constructions of a two-to-one and surjective homomorphism of SU(2) onto SO(3).

Using quaternions of unit norm

The group SU(2) is isomorphic to the quaternions of unit norm via a map given by^[5]

$${\displaystyle q=a\mathbf {1} +b\mathbf {i} +c\mathbf {j} +d\mathbf {k} =\alpha +\beta \mathbf {j} \leftrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}\alpha &\beta \\-{\overline {\beta ))&{\overline {\alpha ))\end{bmatrix))=U}$$

${\textstyle a^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}+d^{2}=|\alpha |^{2}+|\beta |^{2}=1}$

${\textstyle q\in \mathbb {H} }$

${\textstyle a,b,c,d\in \mathbb {R} }$

${\textstyle U\in \operatorname {SU} (2)}$

${\displaystyle \alpha =a+bi\in \mathbb {C} }$

${\displaystyle \beta =c+di\in \mathbb {C} }$

Let us now identify ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ with the span of ${\displaystyle \mathbf {i} ,\mathbf {j} ,\mathbf {k} }$. One can then verify that if ${\displaystyle v}$ is in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ and ${\displaystyle q}$ is a unit quaternion, then

$${\displaystyle qvq^{-1}\in \mathbb {R} ^{3}.}$$

Furthermore, the map ${\displaystyle v\mapsto qvq^{-1))$ is a rotation of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}.}$ Moreover, ${\displaystyle (-q)v(-q)^{-1))$ is the same as ${\displaystyle qvq^{-1))$. This means that there is a 2:1 homomorphism from quaternions of unit norm to the 3D rotation group SO(3).

One can work this homomorphism out explicitly: the unit quaternion, q, with

$${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}q&=w+x\mathbf {i} +y\mathbf {j} +z\mathbf {k} ,\\1&=w^{2}+x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2},\end{aligned))}$$

$${\displaystyle Q={\begin{bmatrix}1-2y^{2}-2z^{2}&2xy-2zw&2xz+2yw\\2xy+2zw&1-2x^{2}-2z^{2}&2yz-2xw\\2xz-2yw&2yz+2xw&1-2x^{2}-2y^{2}\end{bmatrix)).}$$

This is a rotation around the vector (x, y, z) by an angle 2θ, where cos θ = w and |sin θ| = ‖(x, y, z)‖. The proper sign for sin θ is implied, once the signs of the axis components are fixed. The 2:1-nature is apparent since both q and −q map to the same Q.

Using Möbius transformations

The general reference for this section is Gelfand, Minlos & Shapiro (1963). The points P on the sphere

${\displaystyle \mathbf {S} =\left\{(x,y,z)\in \mathbb {R} ^{3}:x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}={\frac {1}{4))\right\))$

can, barring the north pole N, be put into one-to-one bijection with points S(P) = P' on the plane M defined by z = −1/2, see figure. The map S is called stereographic projection.

Let the coordinates on M be (ξ, η). The line L passing through N and P can be parametrized as

${\displaystyle L(t)=N+t(N-P)=\left(0,0,{\frac {1}{2))\right)+t\left(\left(0,0,{\frac {1}{2))\right)-(x,y,z)\right),\quad t\in \mathbb {R} .}$

Demanding that the z-coordinate of ${\displaystyle L(t_{0})}$ equals −1/2, one finds

${\displaystyle t_{0}={\frac {1}{z-{\frac {1}{2)))).}$

We have ${\displaystyle L(t_{0})=(\xi ,\eta ,-1/2).}$ Hence the map

${\displaystyle {\begin{cases}S:\mathbf {S} \to M\\P=(x,y,z)\longmapsto P'=(\xi ,\eta )=\left({\frac {x}((\frac {1}{2))-z)),{\frac {y}((\frac {1}{2))-z))\right)\equiv \zeta =\xi +i\eta \end{cases))}$

where, for later convenience, the plane M is identified with the complex plane ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} .}$

For the inverse, write L as

${\displaystyle L=N+s(P'-N)=\left(0,0,{\frac {1}{2))\right)+s\left(\left(\xi ,\eta ,-{\frac {1}{2))\right)-\left(0,0,{\frac {1}{2))\right)\right),}$

and demand x² + y² + z² = 1/4 to find s = 1/1 + ξ² + η² and thus

${\displaystyle {\begin{cases}S^{-1}:M\to \mathbf {S} \\P'=(\xi ,\eta )\longmapsto P=(x,y,z)=\left({\frac {\xi }{1+\xi ^{2}+\eta ^{2))},{\frac {\eta }{1+\xi ^{2}+\eta ^{2))},{\frac {-1+\xi ^{2}+\eta ^{2)){2+2\xi ^{2}+2\eta ^{2))}\right)\end{cases))}$

If g ∈ SO(3) is a rotation, then it will take points on S to points on S by its standard action Π_s(g) on the embedding space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}.}$ By composing this action with S one obtains a transformation S ∘ Π_s(g) ∘ S⁻¹ of M,

${\displaystyle \zeta =P'\longmapsto P\longmapsto \Pi _{s}(g)P=gP\longmapsto S(gP)\equiv \Pi _{u}(g)\zeta =\zeta '.}$

Thus Π_u(g) is a transformation of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$ associated to the transformation Π_s(g) of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$.

It turns out that g ∈ SO(3) represented in this way by Π_u(g) can be expressed as a matrix Π_u(g) ∈ SU(2) (where the notation is recycled to use the same name for the matrix as for the transformation of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$ it represents). To identify this matrix, consider first a rotation g_φ about the z-axis through an angle φ,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x'&=x\cos \phi -y\sin \phi ,\\y'&=x\sin \phi +y\cos \phi ,\\z'&=z.\end{aligned))}$

Hence

${\displaystyle \zeta '={\frac {x'+iy'}((\frac {1}{2))-z'))={\frac {e^{i\phi }(x+iy)}((\frac {1}{2))-z))=e^{i\phi }\zeta ={\frac {e^{\frac {i\phi }{2))\zeta +0}{0\zeta +e^{-{\frac {i\phi }{2))))},}$

which, unsurprisingly, is a rotation in the complex plane. In an analogous way, if g_θ is a rotation about the x-axis through an angle θ, then

${\displaystyle w'=e^{i\theta }w,\quad w={\frac {y+iz}((\frac {1}{2))-x)),}$

which, after a little algebra, becomes

${\displaystyle \zeta '={\frac {\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))\zeta +i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))}{i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))\zeta +\cos {\frac {\theta }{2)))).}$

These two rotations, ${\displaystyle g_{\phi },g_{\theta },}$ thus correspond to bilinear transforms of R² ≃ C ≃ M, namely, they are examples of Möbius transformations.

A general Möbius transformation is given by

${\displaystyle \zeta '={\frac {\alpha \zeta +\beta }{\gamma \zeta +\delta )),\quad \alpha \delta -\beta \gamma \neq 0.}$

The rotations, ${\displaystyle g_{\phi },g_{\theta ))$ generate all of SO(3) and the composition rules of the Möbius transformations show that any composition of ${\displaystyle g_{\phi },g_{\theta ))$ translates to the corresponding composition of Möbius transformations. The Möbius transformations can be represented by matrices

${\displaystyle {\begin{pmatrix}\alpha &\beta \\\gamma &\delta \end{pmatrix)),\qquad \alpha \delta -\beta \gamma =1,}$

since a common factor of α, β, γ, δ cancels.

For the same reason, the matrix is not uniquely defined since multiplication by −I has no effect on either the determinant or the Möbius transformation. The composition law of Möbius transformations follow that of the corresponding matrices. The conclusion is that each Möbius transformation corresponds to two matrices g, −g ∈ SL(2, C).

Using this correspondence one may write

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pi _{u}(g_{\phi })&=\Pi _{u}\left[{\begin{pmatrix}\cos \phi &-\sin \phi &0\\\sin \phi &\cos \phi &0\\0&0&1\end{pmatrix))\right]=\pm {\begin{pmatrix}e^{i{\frac {\phi }{2))}&0\\0&e^{-i{\frac {\phi }{2))}\end{pmatrix)),\\\Pi _{u}(g_{\theta })&=\Pi _{u}\left[{\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&\cos \theta &-\sin \theta \\0&\sin \theta &\cos \theta \end{pmatrix))\right]=\pm {\begin{pmatrix}\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))&i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))\\i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))&\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))\end{pmatrix)).\end{aligned))}$

These matrices are unitary and thus Π_u(SO(3)) ⊂ SU(2) ⊂ SL(2, C). In terms of Euler angles^{[nb 1]} one finds for a general rotation

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}g(\phi ,\theta ,\psi )=g_{\phi }g_{\theta }g_{\psi }&={\begin{pmatrix}\cos \phi &-\sin \phi &0\\\sin \phi &\cos \phi &0\\0&0&1\end{pmatrix)){\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&\cos \theta &-\sin \theta \\0&\sin \theta &\cos \theta \end{pmatrix)){\begin{pmatrix}\cos \psi &-\sin \psi &0\\\sin \psi &\cos \psi &0\\0&0&1\end{pmatrix))\\&={\begin{pmatrix}\cos \phi \cos \psi -\cos \theta \sin \phi \sin \psi &-\cos \phi \sin \psi -\cos \theta \sin \phi \cos \psi &\sin \phi \sin \theta \\\sin \phi \cos \psi +\cos \theta \cos \phi \sin \psi &-\sin \phi \sin \psi +\cos \theta \cos \phi \cos \psi &-\cos \phi \sin \theta \\\sin \psi \sin \theta &\cos \psi \sin \theta &\cos \theta \end{pmatrix)),\end{aligned))}$

(1)

one has^[6]

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\Pi _{u}(g(\phi ,\theta ,\psi ))&=\pm {\begin{pmatrix}e^{i{\frac {\phi }{2))}&0\\0&e^{-i{\frac {\phi }{2))}\end{pmatrix)){\begin{pmatrix}\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))&i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))\\i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))&\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))\end{pmatrix)){\begin{pmatrix}e^{i{\frac {\psi }{2))}&0\\0&e^{-i{\frac {\psi }{2))}\end{pmatrix))\\&=\pm {\begin{pmatrix}\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))e^{i{\frac {\phi +\psi }{2))}&i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))e^{i{\frac {\phi -\psi }{2))}\\i\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))e^{-i{\frac {\phi -\psi }{2))}&\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))e^{-i{\frac {\phi +\psi }{2))}\end{pmatrix)).\end{aligned))}$

(2)

For the converse, consider a general matrix

${\displaystyle \pm \Pi _{u}(g_{\alpha ,\beta })=\pm {\begin{pmatrix}\alpha &\beta \\-{\overline {\beta ))&{\overline {\alpha ))\end{pmatrix))\in \operatorname {SU} (2).}$

Make the substitutions

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))&=|\alpha |,&\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))&=|\beta |,&(0\leq \theta \leq \pi ),\\{\frac {\phi +\psi }{2))&=\arg \alpha ,&{\frac {\psi -\phi }{2))&=\arg \beta .&\end{aligned))}$

With the substitutions, Π(g_{α, β}) assumes the form of the right hand side (RHS) of (2), which corresponds under Π_u to a matrix on the form of the RHS of (1) with the same φ, θ, ψ. In terms of the complex parameters α, β,

${\displaystyle g_{\alpha ,\beta }={\begin{pmatrix}{\frac {1}{2))\left(\alpha ^{2}-\beta ^{2}+{\overline {\alpha ^{2))}-{\overline {\beta ^{2))}\right)&{\frac {i}{2))\left(-\alpha ^{2}-\beta ^{2}+{\overline {\alpha ^{2))}+{\overline {\beta ^{2))}\right)&-\alpha \beta -{\overline {\alpha )){\overline {\beta ))\\{\frac {i}{2))\left(\alpha ^{2}-\beta ^{2}-{\overline {\alpha ^{2))}+{\overline {\beta ^{2))}\right)&{\frac {1}{2))\left(\alpha ^{2}+\beta ^{2}+{\overline {\alpha ^{2))}+{\overline {\beta ^{2))}\right)&-i\left(+\alpha \beta -{\overline {\alpha )){\overline {\beta ))\right)\\\alpha {\overline {\beta ))+{\overline {\alpha ))\beta &i\left(-\alpha {\overline {\beta ))+{\overline {\alpha ))\beta \right)&\alpha {\overline {\alpha ))-\beta {\overline {\beta ))\end{pmatrix)).}$

To verify this, substitute for α. β the elements of the matrix on the RHS of (2). After some manipulation, the matrix assumes the form of the RHS of (1).

It is clear from the explicit form in terms of Euler angles that the map

${\displaystyle {\begin{cases}p:\operatorname {SU} (2)\to \operatorname {SO} (3)\\\Pi _{u}(\pm g_{\alpha \beta })\mapsto g_{\alpha \beta }\end{cases))}$

just described is a smooth, 2:1 and surjective group homomorphism. It is hence an explicit description of the universal covering space of SO(3) from the universal covering group SU(2).

Lie algebra

Associated with every Lie group is its Lie algebra, a linear space of the same dimension as the Lie group, closed under a bilinear alternating product called the Lie bracket. The Lie algebra of SO(3) is denoted by ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ and consists of all skew-symmetric 3 × 3 matrices.^[7] This may be seen by differentiating the orthogonality condition, A^TA = I, A ∈ SO(3).^{[nb 2]} The Lie bracket of two elements of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ is, as for the Lie algebra of every matrix group, given by the matrix commutator, [A₁, A₂] = A₁A₂ − A₂A₁, which is again a skew-symmetric matrix. The Lie algebra bracket captures the essence of the Lie group product in a sense made precise by the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula.

The elements of ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ are the "infinitesimal generators" of rotations, i.e., they are the elements of the tangent space of the manifold SO(3) at the identity element. If ${\displaystyle R(\phi ,{\boldsymbol {n)))}$ denotes a counterclockwise rotation with angle φ about the axis specified by the unit vector ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {n)),}$ then

${\displaystyle \forall {\boldsymbol {u))\in \mathbb {R} ^{3}:\qquad \left.{\frac {\operatorname {d} }{\operatorname {d} \phi ))\right|_{\phi =0}R(\phi ,{\boldsymbol {n))){\boldsymbol {u))={\boldsymbol {n))\times {\boldsymbol {u)).}$

This can be used to show that the Lie algebra ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ (with commutator) is isomorphic to the Lie algebra ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ (with cross product). Under this isomorphism, an Euler vector ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\omega ))\in \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ corresponds to the linear map ${\displaystyle {\widetilde {\boldsymbol {\omega ))))$ defined by ${\displaystyle {\widetilde {\boldsymbol {\omega ))}({\boldsymbol {u)))={\boldsymbol {\omega ))\times {\boldsymbol {u)).}$

In more detail, most often a suitable basis for ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ as a 3-dimensional vector space is

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {L))_{x}={\begin{bmatrix}0&0&0\\0&0&-1\\0&1&0\end{bmatrix)),\quad {\boldsymbol {L))_{y}={\begin{bmatrix}0&0&1\\0&0&0\\-1&0&0\end{bmatrix)),\quad {\boldsymbol {L))_{z}={\begin{bmatrix}0&-1&0\\1&0&0\\0&0&0\end{bmatrix)).}$

The commutation relations of these basis elements are,

${\displaystyle [{\boldsymbol {L))_{x},{\boldsymbol {L))_{y}]={\boldsymbol {L))_{z},\quad [{\boldsymbol {L))_{z},{\boldsymbol {L))_{x}]={\boldsymbol {L))_{y},\quad [{\boldsymbol {L))_{y},{\boldsymbol {L))_{z}]={\boldsymbol {L))_{x))$

which agree with the relations of the three standard unit vectors of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ under the cross product.

As announced above, one can identify any matrix in this Lie algebra with an Euler vector ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\omega ))=(x,y,z)\in \mathbb {R} ^{3},}$^[8]

${\displaystyle {\widehat {\boldsymbol {\omega ))}={\boldsymbol {\omega ))\cdot {\boldsymbol {L))=x{\boldsymbol {L))_{x}+y{\boldsymbol {L))_{y}+z{\boldsymbol {L))_{z}={\begin{bmatrix}0&-z&y\\z&0&-x\\-y&x&0\end{bmatrix))\in {\mathfrak {so))(3).}$

This identification is sometimes called the hat-map.^[9] Under this identification, the ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ bracket corresponds in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ to the cross product,

${\displaystyle \left[{\widehat {\boldsymbol {u))},{\widehat {\boldsymbol {v))}\right]={\widehat ((\boldsymbol {u))\times {\boldsymbol {v)))).}$

The matrix identified with a vector ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {u))}$ has the property that

${\displaystyle {\widehat {\boldsymbol {u))}{\boldsymbol {v))={\boldsymbol {u))\times {\boldsymbol {v)),}$

where the left-hand side we have ordinary matrix multiplication. This implies ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {u))}$ is in the null space of the skew-symmetric matrix with which it is identified, because ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {u))\times {\boldsymbol {u))={\boldsymbol {0)).}$

A note on Lie algebras

In Lie algebra representations, the group SO(3) is compact and simple of rank 1, and so it has a single independent Casimir element, a quadratic invariant function of the three generators which commutes with all of them. The Killing form for the rotation group is just the Kronecker delta, and so this Casimir invariant is simply the sum of the squares of the generators, ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {J))_{x},{\boldsymbol {J))_{y},{\boldsymbol {J))_{z},}$ of the algebra

${\displaystyle [{\boldsymbol {J))_{x},{\boldsymbol {J))_{y}]={\boldsymbol {J))_{z},\quad [{\boldsymbol {J))_{z},{\boldsymbol {J))_{x}]={\boldsymbol {J))_{y},\quad [{\boldsymbol {J))_{y},{\boldsymbol {J))_{z}]={\boldsymbol {J))_{x}.}$

That is, the Casimir invariant is given by

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {J))^{2}\equiv {\boldsymbol {J))\cdot {\boldsymbol {J))={\boldsymbol {J))_{x}^{2}+{\boldsymbol {J))_{y}^{2}+{\boldsymbol {J))_{z}^{2}\propto {\boldsymbol {I)).}$

For unitary irreducible representations D^j, the eigenvalues of this invariant are real and discrete, and characterize each representation, which is finite dimensional, of dimensionality ${\displaystyle 2j+1}$. That is, the eigenvalues of this Casimir operator are

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {J))^{2}=-j(j+1){\boldsymbol {I))_{2j+1},}$

where j is integer or half-integer, and referred to as the spin or angular momentum.

So, the 3 × 3 generators L displayed above act on the triplet (spin 1) representation, while the 2 × 2 generators below, t, act on the doublet (spin-1/2) representation. By taking Kronecker products of D^1/2 with itself repeatedly, one may construct all higher irreducible representations D^j. That is, the resulting generators for higher spin systems in three spatial dimensions, for arbitrarily large j, can be calculated using these spin operators and ladder operators.

For every unitary irreducible representations D^j there is an equivalent one, D^−j−1. All infinite-dimensional irreducible representations must be non-unitary, since the group is compact.

In quantum mechanics, the Casimir invariant is the "angular-momentum-squared" operator; integer values of spin j characterize bosonic representations, while half-integer values fermionic representations. The antihermitian matrices used above are utilized as spin operators, after they are multiplied by i, so they are now hermitian (like the Pauli matrices). Thus, in this language,

${\displaystyle [{\boldsymbol {J))_{x},{\boldsymbol {J))_{y}]=i{\boldsymbol {J))_{z},\quad [{\boldsymbol {J))_{z},{\boldsymbol {J))_{x}]=i{\boldsymbol {J))_{y},\quad [{\boldsymbol {J))_{y},{\boldsymbol {J))_{z}]=i{\boldsymbol {J))_{x}.}$

and hence

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {J))^{2}=j(j+1){\boldsymbol {I))_{2j+1}.}$

Explicit expressions for these D^j are,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\left({\boldsymbol {J))_{z}^{(j)}\right)_{ba}&=(j+1-a)\delta _{b,a}\\\left({\boldsymbol {J))_{x}^{(j)}\right)_{ba}&={\frac {1}{2))\left(\delta _{b,a+1}+\delta _{b+1,a}\right){\sqrt {(j+1)(a+b-1)-ab))\\\left({\boldsymbol {J))_{y}^{(j)}\right)_{ba}&={\frac {1}{2i))\left(\delta _{b,a+1}-\delta _{b+1,a}\right){\sqrt {(j+1)(a+b-1)-ab))\\\end{aligned))}$

where j is arbitrary and ${\displaystyle 1\leq a,b\leq 2j+1}$.

For example, the resulting spin matrices for spin 1 (${\displaystyle j=1}$) are

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {J))_{x}&={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2))}{\begin{pmatrix}0&1&0\\1&0&1\\0&1&0\end{pmatrix))\\{\boldsymbol {J))_{y}&={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2))}{\begin{pmatrix}0&-i&0\\i&0&-i\\0&i&0\end{pmatrix))\\{\boldsymbol {J))_{z}&={\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&-1\end{pmatrix))\end{aligned))}$

Note, however, how these are in an equivalent, but different basis, the spherical basis, than the above iL in the Cartesian basis.^{[nb 3]}

For higher spins, such as spin 3/2 (${\displaystyle j={\tfrac {3}{2))}$):

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {J))_{x}&={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{pmatrix}0&{\sqrt {3))&0&0\\{\sqrt {3))&0&2&0\\0&2&0&{\sqrt {3))\\0&0&{\sqrt {3))&0\end{pmatrix))\\{\boldsymbol {J))_{y}&={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{pmatrix}0&-i{\sqrt {3))&0&0\\i{\sqrt {3))&0&-2i&0\\0&2i&0&-i{\sqrt {3))\\0&0&i{\sqrt {3))&0\end{pmatrix))\\{\boldsymbol {J))_{z}&={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{pmatrix}3&0&0&0\\0&1&0&0\\0&0&-1&0\\0&0&0&-3\end{pmatrix)).\end{aligned))}$

For spin 5/2 (${\displaystyle j={\tfrac {5}{2))}$),

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\boldsymbol {J))_{x}&={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{pmatrix}0&{\sqrt {5))&0&0&0&0\\{\sqrt {5))&0&2{\sqrt {2))&0&0&0\\0&2{\sqrt {2))&0&3&0&0\\0&0&3&0&2{\sqrt {2))&0\\0&0&0&2{\sqrt {2))&0&{\sqrt {5))\\0&0&0&0&{\sqrt {5))&0\end{pmatrix))\\{\boldsymbol {J))_{y}&={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{pmatrix}0&-i{\sqrt {5))&0&0&0&0\\i{\sqrt {5))&0&-2i{\sqrt {2))&0&0&0\\0&2i{\sqrt {2))&0&-3i&0&0\\0&0&3i&0&-2i{\sqrt {2))&0\\0&0&0&2i{\sqrt {2))&0&-i{\sqrt {5))\\0&0&0&0&i{\sqrt {5))&0\end{pmatrix))\\{\boldsymbol {J))_{z}&={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{pmatrix}5&0&0&0&0&0\\0&3&0&0&0&0\\0&0&1&0&0&0\\0&0&0&-1&0&0\\0&0&0&0&-3&0\\0&0&0&0&0&-5\end{pmatrix)).\end{aligned))}$

Isomorphism with 𝖘𝖚(2)

The Lie algebras ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su))(2)}$ are isomorphic. One basis for ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su))(2)}$ is given by^[10]

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {t))_{1}={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{bmatrix}0&-i\\-i&0\end{bmatrix)),\quad {\boldsymbol {t))_{2}={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{bmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{bmatrix)),\quad {\boldsymbol {t))_{3}={\frac {1}{2)){\begin{bmatrix}-i&0\\0&i\end{bmatrix)).}$

These are related to the Pauli matrices by

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {t))_{i}\longleftrightarrow {\frac {1}{2i))\sigma _{i}.}$

The Pauli matrices abide by the physicists' convention for Lie algebras. In that convention, Lie algebra elements are multiplied by i, the exponential map (below) is defined with an extra factor of i in the exponent and the structure constants remain the same, but the definition of them acquires a factor of i. Likewise, commutation relations acquire a factor of i. The commutation relations for the ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {t))_{i))$ are

${\displaystyle [{\boldsymbol {t))_{i},{\boldsymbol {t))_{j}]=\varepsilon _{ijk}{\boldsymbol {t))_{k},}$

where ε_ijk is the totally anti-symmetric symbol with ε₁₂₃ = 1. The isomorphism between ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su))(2)}$ can be set up in several ways. For later convenience, ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {so))(3)}$ and ${\displaystyle {\mathfrak {su))(2)}$ are identified by mapping

${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {L))_{x}\longleftrightarrow {\boldsymbol {t))_{1},\quad {\boldsymbol {L))_{y}\longleftrightarrow {\boldsymbol {t))_{2},\quad {\boldsymbol {L))_{z}\longleftrightarrow {\boldsymbol {t))_{3},}$

and extending by linearity.

Exponential map

The exponential map for SO(3), is, since SO(3) is a matrix Lie group, defined using the standard matrix exponential series,

${\displaystyle {\begin{cases}\exp :{\mathfrak {so))(3)\to \operatorname {SO} (3)\\A\mapsto e^{A}=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{k!))A^{k}=I+A+{\tfrac {1}{2))A^{2}+\cdots .\end{cases))}$

For any skew-symmetric matrix A ∈ 𝖘𝖔(3), e^A is always in SO(3). The proof uses the elementary properties of the matrix exponential

${\displaystyle \left(e^{A}\right)^{\textsf {T))e^{A}=e^{A^{\textsf {T))}e^{A}=e^{A^{\textsf {T))+A}=e^{-A+A}=e^{A-A}=e^{A}\left(e^{A}\right)^{\textsf {T))=e^{0}=I.}$

since the matrices A and A^T commute, this can be easily proven with the skew-symmetric matrix condition. This is not enough to show that 𝖘𝖔(3) is the corresponding Lie algebra for SO(3), and shall be proven separately.

The level of difficulty of proof depends on how a matrix group Lie algebra is defined. Hall (2003) defines the Lie algebra as the set of matrices

${\displaystyle \left\{A\in \operatorname {M} (n,\mathbb {R} )\left|e^{tA}\in \operatorname {SO} (3)\forall t\right.\right\},}$

in which case it is trivial. Rossmann (2002) uses for a definition derivatives of smooth curve segments in SO(3) through the identity taken at the identity, in which case it is harder.^[11]

For a fixed A ≠ 0, e^tA, −∞ < t < ∞ is a one-parameter subgroup along a geodesic in SO(3). That this gives a one-parameter subgroup follows directly from properties of the exponential map.^[12]

The exponential map provides a diffeomorphism between a neighborhood of the origin in the 𝖘𝖔(3) and a neighborhood of the identity in the SO(3).^[13] For a proof, see Closed subgroup theorem.

The exponential map is surjective. This follows from the fact that every R ∈ SO(3), since every rotation leaves an axis fixed (Euler's rotation theorem), and is conjugate to a block diagonal matrix of the form

${\displaystyle D={\begin{pmatrix}\cos \theta &-\sin \theta &0\\\sin \theta &\cos \theta &0\\0&0&1\end{pmatrix))=e^{\theta L_{z)),}$

such that A = BDB⁻¹, and that

${\displaystyle Be^{\theta L_{z))B^{-1}=e^{B\theta L_{z}B^{-1)),}$

together with the fact that 𝖘𝖔(3) is closed under the adjoint action of SO(3), meaning that BθL_zB⁻¹ ∈ 𝖘𝖔(3).

Thus, e.g., it is easy to check the popular identity

${\displaystyle e^{-\pi L_{x}/2}e^{\theta L_{z))e^{\pi L_{x}/2}=e^{\theta L_{y)).}$

As shown above, every element A ∈ 𝖘𝖔(3) is associated with a vector ω = θ u, where u = (x,y,z) is a unit magnitude vector. Since u is in the null space of A, if one now rotates to a new basis, through some other orthogonal matrix O, with u as the z axis, the final column and row of the rotation matrix in the new basis will be zero.

Thus, we know in advance from the formula for the exponential that exp(OAO^T) must leave u fixed. It is mathematically impossible to supply a straightforward formula for such a basis as a function of u, because its existence would violate the hairy ball theorem; but direct exponentiation is possible, and yields

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\exp({\tilde {\boldsymbol {\omega ))})&=\exp(\theta ({\boldsymbol {u\cdot L))))=\exp \left(\theta {\begin{bmatrix}0&-z&y\\z&0&-x\\-y&x&0\end{bmatrix))\right)\\[4pt]&={\boldsymbol {I))+2cs({\boldsymbol {u\cdot L)))+2s^{2}({\boldsymbol {u\cdot L)))^{2}\\[4pt]&={\begin{bmatrix}2\left(x^{2}-1\right)s^{2}+1&2xys^{2}-2zcs&2xzs^{2}+2ycs\\2xys^{2}+2zcs&2\left(y^{2}-1\right)s^{2}+1&2yzs^{2}-2xcs\\2xzs^{2}-2ycs&2yzs^{2}+2xcs&2\left(z^{2}-1\right)s^{2}+1\end{bmatrix)),\end{aligned))}$

where ${\textstyle c=\cos {\frac {\theta }{2))}$ and ${\textstyle s=\sin {\frac {\theta }{2))}$. This is recognized as a matrix for a rotation around axis u by the angle θ: cf. Rodrigues' rotation formula.

Logarithm map

Given R ∈ SO(3), let ${\displaystyle A={\tfrac {1}{2))\left(R-R^{\mathrm {T} }\right)}$ denote the antisymmetric part and let ${\textstyle \|A\|={\sqrt {-{\frac {1}{2))\operatorname {Tr} \left(A^{2}\right))).}$ Then, the logarithm of R is given by^[9]

${\displaystyle \log R={\frac {\sin ^{-1}\|A\|}{\|A\|))A.}$

This is manifest by inspection of the mixed symmetry form of Rodrigues' formula,

${\displaystyle e^{X}=I+{\frac {\sin \theta }{\theta ))X+2{\frac {\sin ^{2}{\frac {\theta }{2))}{\theta ^{2))}X^{2},\quad \theta =\|X\|,}$

where the first and last term on the right-hand side are symmetric.

Uniform random sampling

${\displaystyle SO(3)}$ is doubly covered by the group of unit quaternions, which is isomorphic to the 3-sphere. Since the Haar measure on the unit quaternions is just the 3-area measure in 4 dimensions, the Haar measure on ${\displaystyle SO(3)}$ is just the pushforward of the 3-area measure.

Consequently, generating a uniformly random rotation in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3))$ is equivalent to generating a uniformly random point on the 3-sphere. This can be accomplished by the following

$${\displaystyle ({\sqrt {1-u_{1))}\sin(2\pi u_{2}),{\sqrt {1-u_{1))}\cos(2\pi u_{2}),{\sqrt {u_{1))}\sin(2\pi u_{3}),{\sqrt {u_{1))}\cos(2\pi u_{3}))}$$

where ${\displaystyle u_{1},u_{2},u_{3))$ are uniformly random samples of ${\displaystyle [0,1]}$.^[14]

Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula

Suppose X and Y in the Lie algebra are given. Their exponentials, exp(X) and exp(Y), are rotation matrices, which can be multiplied. Since the exponential map is a surjection, for some Z in the Lie algebra, exp(Z) = exp(X) exp(Y), and one may tentatively write

${\displaystyle Z=C(X,Y),}$

for C some expression in X and Y. When exp(X) and exp(Y) commute, then Z = X + Y, mimicking the behavior of complex exponentiation.

The general case is given by the more elaborate BCH formula, a series expansion of nested Lie brackets.^[15] For matrices, the Lie bracket is the same operation as the commutator, which monitors lack of commutativity in multiplication. This general expansion unfolds as follows,^{[nb 4]}

${\displaystyle Z=C(X,Y)=X+Y+{\frac {1}{2))[X,Y]+{\tfrac {1}{12))[X,[X,Y]]-{\frac {1}{12))[Y,[X,Y]]+\cdots .}$

The infinite expansion in the BCH formula for SO(3) reduces to a compact form,

${\displaystyle Z=\alpha X+\beta Y+\gamma [X,Y],}$

for suitable trigonometric function coefficients (α, β, γ).

It is worthwhile to write this composite rotation generator as

${\displaystyle \alpha X+\beta Y+\gamma [X,Y]{\underset ((\mathfrak {so))(3)}{=))X+Y+{\frac {1}{2))[X,Y]+{\frac {1}{12))[X,[X,Y]]-{\frac {1}{12))[Y,[X,Y]]+\cdots ,}$

to emphasize that this is a Lie algebra identity.

The above identity holds for all faithful representations of 𝖘𝖔(3). The kernel of a Lie algebra homomorphism is an ideal, but 𝖘𝖔(3), being simple, has no nontrivial ideals and all nontrivial representations are hence faithful. It holds in particular in the doublet or spinor representation. The same explicit formula thus follows in a simpler way through Pauli matrices, cf. the 2×2 derivation for SU(2).