Figure 1: 53-TET on the syntonic temperament's tuning continuum at 701.89, from (Milne et al. 2007)[1]

In music, 53 equal temperament, called 53 TET, 53 EDO, or 53 ET, is the tempered scale derived by dividing the octave into 53 equal steps (equal frequency ratios). Play Each step represents a frequency ratio of 2153, or 22.6415 cents (Play), an interval sometimes called the Holdrian comma.

53-TET is a tuning of equal temperament in which the tempered perfect fifth is 701.89 cents wide, as shown in Figure 1.

The 53-TET tuning equates to the unison, or tempers out, the intervals 3280532768, known as the schisma, and 1562515552, known as the kleisma. These are both 5 limit intervals, involving only the primes 2, 3 and 5 in their factorization, and the fact that 53 ET tempers out both characterizes it completely as a 5 limit temperament: it is the only regular temperament tempering out both of these intervals, or commas, a fact which seems to have first been recognized by Japanese music theorist Shohé Tanaka. Because it tempers these out, 53-TET can be used for both schismatic temperament, tempering out the schisma, and Hanson temperament (also called kleismic), tempering out the kleisma.

The interval of 74 is 4.8 cents sharp in 53-TET, and using it for 7-limit harmony means that the septimal kleisma, the interval 225224, is also tempered out.

History and use

Theoretical interest in this division goes back to antiquity. Jing Fang (78–37 BCE), a Chinese music theorist, observed that a series of 53 just fifths ([32]53) is very nearly equal to 31 octaves (231). He calculated this difference with six-digit accuracy to be 177147176776.[2][3] Later the same observation was made by the mathematician and music theorist Nicholas Mercator (c. 1620–1687), who calculated this value precisely as (353)(284) = 1938324566768001989679672319342813113834066795298816,[verification needed] which is known as Mercator's comma.[4] Mercator's comma is of such small value to begin with (≈ 3.615 cents), but 53 equal temperament flattens each fifth by only 153 of that comma (≈ 0.0682 cent ≈ 1315 syntonic comma1344 pythagorean comma). Thus, 53 tone equal temperament is for all practical purposes equivalent to an extended Pythagorean tuning.

After Mercator, William Holder published a treatise in 1694 which pointed out that 53 equal temperament also very closely approximates the just major third (to within 1.4 cents), and consequently 53 equal temperament accommodates the intervals of 5 limit just intonation very well.[5][6] This property of 53-TET may have been known earlier; Isaac Newton's unpublished manuscripts suggest that he had been aware of it as early as 1664–1665.[7]

Music

In the 19th century, people began devising instruments in 53 TET, with an eye to their use in playing near-just 5-limit music. Such instruments were devised by R.H.M. Bosanquet[8](p 328–329) and the American tuner J.P. White.[8](p 329) Subsequently, the temperament has seen occasional use by composers in the west, and by the early 20th century, 53 TET had become the most common form of tuning in Ottoman classical music, replacing its older, unequal tuning. Arabic music, which for the most part bases its theory on quartertones, has also made some use of it; the Syrian violinist and music theorist Twfiq Al-Sabagh proposed that instead of an equal division of the octave into 24 parts a 24 note scale in 53 TET should be used as the master scale for Arabic music.[citation needed]

Croatian composer Josip Štolcer-Slavenski wrote one piece, which has never been published, which uses Bosanquet's Enharmonium during its first movement, entitled Music for Natur-ton-system.[9][10][11] Furthermore, General Thompson worked in league with the London-based guitar maker Louis Panormo to produce the Enharmonic Guitar.[12]

Notation

Notation used in Ottoman classical music, where the tone is divided into 9 commas

Attempting to use standard notation, seven-letter notes plus sharps or flats, can quickly become confusing. This is unlike the case with 19 TET and 31 TET where there is little ambiguity. By not being meantone, it adds some problems that require more attention. Specifically, the Pythagorean major third (ditone) and just major third are distinguished, as are the Pythagorean minor third (semiditone) and just minor third. The fact that the syntonic comma is not tempered out means that notes and intervals need to be defined more precisely. Ottoman classical music uses a notation of flats and sharps for the 9 comma tone.

Furthermore, since 53 is not a multiple of 12, notes such as G and A are not enharmonically equivalent, nor are the corresponding key signatures. As a result, many key signatures will require the use of double sharps (such as G major / E minor), double flats (such as F major / D minor), or microtonal alterations.

Extended pythagorean notation, using only sharps and flats, gives the following chromatic scale:

Unfortunately, the notes run out of order, and up to quadruple sharps and flats are required. As a result, a just major 3rd must be spelled as a diminished 4th.

Ups and downs notation[13] keeps the notes in order and also preserves the traditional meaning of sharp and flat. It uses up and down arrows, written as a caret or a lower-case "v", usually in a sans-serif font. One arrow equals one step of 53-TET. In note names, the arrows come first, to facilitate chord naming. The many enharmonic equivalences allow great freedom of spelling.

Chords of 53 equal temperament

Since 53-TET is a Pythagorean system, with nearly pure fifths, justly-intonated major and minor triads cannot be spelled in the same manner as in a meantone tuning. Instead, the major triads are chords like C-F-G (using the Pythagorean-based notation), where the major third is a diminished fourth; this is the defining characteristic of schismatic temperament. Likewise, the minor triads are chords like C-D-G. In 53-TET, the dominant seventh chord would be spelled C-F-G-B, but the otonal tetrad is C-F-G-Cdouble flat, and C-F-G-A is still another seventh chord. The utonal tetrad, the inversion of the otonal tetrad, is spelled C-D-G-Gdouble sharp.

Further septimal chords are the diminished triad, having the two forms C-D-G and C-Fdouble flat-G, the subminor triad, C-Fdouble flat-G, the supermajor triad C-Ddouble sharp-G, and corresponding tetrads C-Fdouble flat-G-Bdouble flat and C-Ddouble sharp-G-A. Since 53-TET tempers out the septimal kleisma, the septimal kleisma augmented triad C-F-Btriple flat in its various inversions is also a chord of the system. So is the Orwell tetrad, C-F-Ddouble sharpdouble sharp-Gdouble sharp in its various inversions.

Ups and downs notation permits more conventional spellings. Since it also names the intervals of 53-TET,[14] it provides precise chord names too. The pythagorean minor chord with a 32/27 third is still named Cm and still spelled C–E–G. But the 5-limit upminor chord uses the upminor 3rd 6/5 and is spelled C–^E–G. This chord is named C^m. Compare with ^Cm (^C–^E–^G).

Because 53-TET is compatible with both the schismatic temperament and the syntonic temperament, it can be used as a pivot tuning in a temperament modulation (a musical effect enabled by dynamic tonality).

Interval size

7-Limit just intonation intervals approximated in 53-ET

Because a distance of 31 steps in this scale is almost precisely equal to a just perfect fifth, in theory this scale can be considered a slightly tempered form of Pythagorean tuning that has been extended to 53 tones. As such the intervals available can have the same properties as any Pythagorean tuning, such as fifths that are (practically) pure, major thirds that are wide from just (about 8164 opposed to the purer 54, and minor thirds that are conversely narrow (3227 compared to 65).

However, 53-TET contains additional intervals that are very close to just intonation. For instance, the interval of 17 steps is also a major third, but only 1.4 cents narrower than the very pure just interval 54. 53-TET is very good as an approximation to any interval in 5 limit just intonation. Similarly, the pure just interval 65 is only 1.3 cents wider than 14 steps in 53-TET.

The matches to the just intervals involving the 7th harmonic are slightly less close (43 steps are 4.8 cents sharp for 74), but all such intervals are still quite closely matched with the highest deviation being the 75 tritone. The 11th harmonic and intervals involving it are less closely matched, as illustrated by the undecimal neutral seconds and thirds in the table below. 7-limit ratios are colored light gray, and 11- and 13-limit ratios are colored dark gray.

Size
(steps)
Size
(cents)
Interval name Just
ratio
Just
(cents)
Error
(cents)
Limit
53 1200.00 perfect octave 2:1 1200.00 0 2
48 1086.79 classic major seventh 15:8 1088.27 −1.48 5
45 1018.87 just minor seventh 9:5 1017.60 +1.27 5
44 996.23 Pythagorean minor seventh 16:9 996.09 +0.14 3
43 973.59 harmonic seventh 7:4 968.83 +4.76 7
39 883.02 major sixth 5:3 884.36 −1.34 5
37 837.73 tridecimal neutral sixth 13:8 840.53 −2.8 13
36 815.09 minor sixth 8:5 813.69 +1.40 5
31 701.89 perfect fifth 3:2 701.96 −0.07 3
30 679.25 grave fifth 40:27 680.45 −1.21 5
27 611.32 Pythagorean augmented fourth 729:512 611.73 −0.41 3
26 588.68 diatonic tritone 45:32 590.22 −1.54 5
26 588.68 septimal tritone 7:5 582.51 +6.17 7
25 566.04 classic tritone 25:18 568.72 −2.68 5
24 543.40 undecimal major fourth 11:8 551.32 −7.92 11
24 543.40 double diminished fifth 512:375 539.10 +4.30 5
24 543.40 undecimal augmented fourth 15:11 536.95 +6.45 11
23 520.76 acute fourth 27:20 519.55 +1.21 5
22 498.11 perfect fourth 4:3 498.04 +0.07 3
21 475.47 grave fourth 320:243 476.54 −1.07 5
21 475.47 septimal narrow fourth 21:16 470.78 +4.69 7
20 452.83 classic augmented third 125:96 456.99 −4.16 5
20 452.83 tridecimal augmented third 13:10 454.21 −1.38 13
19 430.19 septimal major third 9:7 435.08 −4.90 7
19 430.19 classic diminished fourth 32:25 427.37 +2.82 5
18 407.54 Pythagorean ditone 81:64 407.82 −0.28 3
17 384.91 just major third 5:4 386.31 −1.40 5
16 362.26 grave major third 100:81 364.80 −2.54 5
16 362.26 neutral third, tridecimal 16:13 359.47 +2.79 13
15 339.62 neutral third, undecimal 11:9 347.41 −7.79 11
15 339.62 acute minor third 243:200 337.15 +2.47 5
14 316.98 just minor third 6:5 315.64 +1.34 5
13 294.34 Pythagorean semiditone 32:27 294.13 +0.21 3
12 271.70 classic augmented second 75:64 274.58 −2.88 5
12 271.70 septimal minor third 7:6 266.87 +4.83 7
11 249.06 classic diminished third 144:125 244.97 +4.09 5
10 226.41 septimal whole tone 8:7 231.17 −4.76 7
10 226.41 diminished third 256:225 223.46 +2.95 5
9 203.77 whole tone, major tone 9:8 203.91 −0.14 3
8 181.13 whole tone, minor tone 10:9 182.40 −1.27 5
7 158.49 neutral second, greater undecimal 11:10 165.00 −6.51 11
7 158.49 grave whole tone 800:729 160.90 −2.41 5
7 158.49 neutral second, lesser undecimal 12:11 150.64 +7.85 11
6 135.85 major diatonic semitone 27:25 133.24 +2.61 5
5 113.21 Pythagorean major semitone 2187:2048 113.69 −0.48 3
5 113.21 just diatonic semitone 16:15 111.73 +1.48 5
4 90.57 major limma 135:128 92.18 −1.61 5
4 90.57 Pythagorean minor semitone 256:243 90.22 +0.34 3
3 67.92 just chromatic semitone 25:24 70.67 −2.75 5
3 67.92 greater diesis 648:625 62.57 +5.35 5
2 45.28 just diesis 128:125 41.06 +4.22 5
1 22.64 syntonic comma 81:80 21.51 +1.14 5
0 0.00 perfect unison 1:1 0.00 0.00 1

Scale diagram

The following are 21 of the 53 notes in the chromatic scale. The rest can easily be added.

Interval (steps) 3 2 4 3 2 3 2 1 2 4 1 4 3 2 4 3 2 3 2 1 2
Interval (cents) 68 45 91 68 45 68 45 23 45 91 23 91 68 45 91 68 45 68 45 23 45
Note name (Pythagorean notation) C Etriple flat C D Fdouble flat D F Ddouble sharp Cdouble sharpdouble sharp/Adouble flatdouble flat F G F G Btriple flat G Bdouble flat Cdouble flat A C Adouble sharp Gdouble sharpdouble sharp/Edouble flatdouble flat C
Note name (ups and downs notation) C vvC/vD C/^D D vvD/vE D/^E vE ^E ^^E/vvF F vF/G F/^G G vvG/vA G/^A vA vvA/vB A/^B vB ^B ^^B/vvC C
Note (cents)   0    68  113 204 272 317 385 430 453 498 589 611 702 770 815 883 974 1018 1087 1132 1155 1200
Note (steps) 0 3 5 9 12 14 17 19 20 22 26 27 31 34 36 39 43 45 48 50 51 53

Holdrian comma

In music theory and musical tuning the Holdrian comma, also called Holder's comma, and rarely the Arabian comma,[15] is a small musical interval of approximately 22.6415 cents,[15] equal to one step of 53 equal temperament, or (play). The name comma is misleading, since this interval is an irrational number and does not describe the compromise between intervals of any tuning system; it assumes this name because it is an approximation of the syntonic comma (21.51 cents)(play), which was widely used as a measurement of tuning in William Holder's time.

The origin of Holder's comma resides in the fact that the Ancient Greeks (or at least Boethius[16]) believed that in the Pythagorean tuning the tone could be divided in nine commas, four of which forming the diatonic semitone and five the chromatic semitone. If all these commas are exactly of the same size, there results an octave of 5 tones + 2 diatonic semitones, 5 × 9 + 2 × 4 = 53 equal commas. Holder[17] attributes the division of the octave in 53 equal parts to Nicholas Mercator,[18] who would have named the 1/53 part of the octave the "artificial comma".

Mercator's comma and the Holdrian comma

Mercator's comma is a name often used for a closely related interval because of its association with Nicholas Mercator.[19] One of these intervals was first described by Ching-Fang in 45 BCE.[15] Mercator applied logarithms to determine that (≈ 21.8182 cents) was nearly equivalent to a syntonic comma of ≈ 21.5063 cents (a feature of the prevalent meantone temperament of the time). He also considered that an "artificial comma" of might be useful, because 31 octaves could be practically approximated by a cycle of 53 just fifths. William Holder, for whom the Holdrian comma is named, favored this latter unit because the intervals of 53 equal temperament are closer to just intonation than that of 55. Thus Mercator's comma and the Holdrian comma are two distinct but related intervals.

Use in Turkish makam theory

The Holdrian comma has been employed mainly in Ottoman/Turkish music theory by Kemal Ilerici, and by the Turkish composer Erol Sayan. The name of this comma is Holder koması in Turkish.

Name of interval Commas Cents Symbol
Koma 1 22.64 F
Bakiye 4 90.57 B
Küçük Mücennep 5 113.21 S
Büyük Mücennep 8 181.13 K
Tanini 9 203.77 T
Artık Aralık (12) 12 271.70 A (12)
Artık Aralık (13) 13 294.34 A (13)

For instance, the Rast makam (similar to the Western major scale, or more precisely to the justly-tuned major scale) may be considered in terms of Holdrian commas:

where half flat denotes a Holdrian comma flat,[i] while in contrast, the Nihavend makam (similar to the Western minor scale):

where denotes a five-comma flat, has medium seconds between d–e, e–f, g–a, ab, and bc′, a medium second being somewhere in between 8 and 9 commas.[15]

Notes

  1. ^ In common Arabic and Turkish practice, the third note ehalf flat and the seventh note bhalf flat in Rast are even lower than in this theory, almost exactly halfway between western major and minor thirds above c and g, i.e. closer to 6.5 commas (three-quarter tone) above d or a and 6.5 below f or c, the thirds c–ehalf flat and g–bhalf flat often referred to as a "neutral thirds" by musicologists.

References

  1. ^ Milne, Andrew; Sethares, William; Plamondon, James (2007). "Isomorphic Controllers and Dynamic Tuning: Invariant Fingering over a Tuning Continuum". Computer Music Journal. 31 (4): 15–32. doi:10.1162/comj.2007.31.4.15. S2CID 27906745.
  2. ^ McClain, Ernest and Ming Shui Hung. Chinese Cyclic Tunings in Late Antiquity, Ethnomusicology Vol. 23 No. 2, 1979. pp. 205–224.
  3. ^ "後漢書/卷91 - 维基文库,自由的图书馆". zh.wikisource.org (in Chinese). Retrieved 2022-06-23.
  4. ^ Monzo, Joe (2005). "Mercator's Comma", Tonalsoft.
  5. ^ Holder, William, Treatise on the Natural Grounds and Principles of Harmony, facsimile of the 1694 London edition, Broude Brothers, 1967
  6. ^ Stanley, Jerome, William Holder and His Position in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy and Music Theory, The Edwin Mellen Press, 2002
  7. ^ Barbieri, Patrizio. Enharmonic instruments and music, 1470–1900 Archived 2009-02-15 at the Wayback Machine. (2008) Latina, Il Levante Libreria Editrice, p. 350.
  8. ^ a b von Helmholtz, H.L.F. (1954). Ellis, Alexander (ed.). On the Sensations of Tone (second English ed.). Dover Publications. pp. 328–329.
  9. ^ Slavencki, Josip (21 June 2007). "Preface to 53EDO piece" (manuscript). The Faculty of Music in Belgrade Serbia – via Wikimedia Commons.
  10. ^ Slavencki, Josip (21 June 2007). "Title with 53EDO movement" (manuscript). The Faculty of Music in Belgrade Serbia – via Wikimedia Commons.
  11. ^ Slavenski, Josip (February 2018). "Music Natural 53e6v". soundcloud.com. Croatian composer Josip Štolcer-Slavenski wrote one piece, which has never been published, which uses Bosanquet's Enharmonium during its first movement, entitled Music for Natur-ton-system Khramov, Mykhaylo (ed.). "Link to ZIP with materials" – via Google Drive.
  12. ^ Westbrook, James (2012). "General Thompson's Enharmonic Guitar". Soundboard. Vol. 38, no. 4. pp. 45–52.
  13. ^ https://en.xen.wiki/w/Ups_and_downs_notation
  14. ^ https://en.xen.wiki/w/53edo#Intervals
  15. ^ a b c d Habib Hassan Touma (1996). The Music of the Arabs, p.23. trans. Laurie Schwartz. Portland, Oregon: Amadeus Press. ISBN 0-931340-88-8.
  16. ^ A. M. S. Boethius, De institutione musica, Book 3, Chap. 8. According to Boethius, Pythagoras' disciple Philolaos would have said that the tone consisted in two diatonic semitones and a comma; the diatonic semitone consisted in two diaschismata, each formed of two commas. See J. Murray Barbour, Tuning and Temperament: A Historical Survey, 1951, p. 123
  17. ^ W. Holder, A Treatise of the Natural Grounds, and Principles of Harmony, London, 3d edition, 1731, p. 79.
  18. ^ "The late Nicholas Mercator, a Modest Person, and a Learned and Judicious Mathematician, in a Manuscript of his, of which I have had a Sight."
  19. ^ W. Holder, A Treatise..., ibid., writes that Mersenne had calculated 58¼ commas in the octave; Mercator "working by the Logarithms, finds out but 55, and a little more."
  • Holder, William (1967) [1694]. A Treatise on the Natural Grounds, and Principles of Harmony (facsimile ed.). New York, NY: Broude Brothers. pp. 103–106.