Wikiquote has quotations related to Allen W. Wood.
Allen William Wood | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1942 Seattle, United States |
| Era | Contemporary philosophy |
| Region | Western philosophy |
| School | Kantian ethics |
Main interests | Trolley problems, Kant, ethics, German idealism, social philosophy |
Allen William Wood[1] (born October 26, 1942)[2] is an American philosopher specializing in the work of Immanuel Kant and German Idealism, with particular interests in ethics and social philosophy. One of the world's foremost Kant scholars, he is the Ruth Norman Halls professor of philosophy at Indiana University,[3] Ward W. and Priscilla B. Woods Professor, emeritus, at Stanford University, and has held professorships and visiting appointments at numerous universities in the United States and Europe. In addition to popularising and clarifying the ethical thought of Kant, Wood has also mounted arguments against the validity of trolley problems in moral philosophy.[4][5]
Born in Seattle, WA,[3] he has held professorships at Cornell University,[6] Yale University,[7] Stanford University,[8] where he is now Ward W. and Priscilla B. Woods Professor emeritus, and at Indiana University since 2008.[9][3] Additionally, he has held visiting appointments at the University of Michigan, University of California at San Diego and Oxford University,[3] where he was Isaiah Berlin Visiting professor in 2005,[10] and has been affiliated with the Freie Universität Berlin in 1983-84 and the Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn in 1991–1992.[3]
Wood has written prolifically on many subjects in moral and social philosophy, and publications he has authored include: Kant's Moral Religion (1970),[11] Kant's Rational Theology (1978),[12] Karl Marx (1981),[13] Hegel's Ethical Thought (1990),[14] Kant's Ethical Thought (1999),[7] Unsettling Obligations (2002),[15] Kant (2004),[16] Kantian Ethics (2007)[4] and The Free Development of Each: Studies in Freedom, Right and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy (2014).[17] He continued his 'Ethical Thought' series with a book entitled Fichte's Ethical Thought (2016),[18] fulfilling his earlier suggestion that "having written a book on Hegel's Ethical Thought and a book on Kant's Ethical Thought, I should... write a book... on Fichte's Ethical Thought.[19]
Along with Paul Guyer, Wood is general editor of the Cambridge Edition of Kant's Writings in English Translation,[20] having contributed to six volumes.[3] He has also edited Self and Nature in Kant's Philosophy (1984),[21] Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of Right (1991),[6] Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (2002),[8] Fichte: Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation (2010),[22] and the Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790-1870), with Songsuk Susan Hahn (2012).[23]
Wood is a leading scholar of Kant's moral philosophy.[24] He has worked extensively to revise public and professional perspectives of Kant's moral philosophy, and to elucidate the "proper aims and structure of a moral theory and the way moral theories relate to ordinary moral decisions."[19] He has suggested that John Rawls and Onora O'Neill have "made people pay more serious attention to Kantian ethical theory."[24] He suggests that many of the problems reported in respect of Kantian ethics are shared by all ethical theories, and that in the context of the problems concerning free will "no rival theory has a satisfactory solution to it."[19]
Wood edited and produced his own translation to Kant's Groundwork to the Metaphysics of Morals,[8] which is the book he always uses to introduce Kantian ethics to students, and the only text by Kant he teaches in general course on ethical theory.[19] He has suggested that "the first fifty times I read the Groundwork I did not understand it at all, but accepted many of the common errors, because they were easy to commit and had become hallowed by generations of misreading by others."[24]
Although critical of consequentialist moral theories,[7] he has nonetheless engaged with representatives of this tradition and has mentioned that he and renowned consequentialist Shelly Kagan were "always very friendly colleagues at Yale".[24] He has claimed that contemporary virtue ethics has "added another valuable perspective", and traced this to G.E.M. Anscombe's "rather incendiary article"[24] Modern Moral Philosophy.[25]
He has raised doubts over whether moral intuitions are credible data in moral epistemology,[19] and raised especial objections to the use of 'trolley problems' in ethical theory.[4][5][26] Furthermore, Wood's objections can be understood as equally indicting the work of moral psychologists such as Joshua Greene and Jonathan Haidt whenever their work depends upon such trolley problems.[27]
Wood has suggested that "all ethical theories are uncertain, questionable, and not apt for justified belief",[19] suggesting that foundational principles for ethics (such as those developed by Kant) remain useful because they allow people with different viewpoints to frame their arguments cogently.[26] He has suggested that basic ethical values, such as human flourishing and the dignity of human persons, "have a role to play in helping people to think better about the terribly problematic situations that face us."[26]
In his keynote address to the Cape Town University Law School in 2007, Wood compared Kant's realm of ends to the African ideal of ubuntu, suggesting that although the two ideas were not the same "I do think they represent very much the same response to the human condition, as manifested in different cultural and historical conditions."[28]
