This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.Find sources: "Appeal to spite" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2008)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
An appeal to spite (Latin: argumentum ad odium) is a fallacy in which someone attempts to win favor for an argument by exploiting existing feelings of bitterness, spite, or schadenfreude in the opposing party. It is an attempt to sway the audience emotionally by associating a hate-figure with opposition to the speaker's argument.
Fallacious ad hominem arguments that attack villains holding the opposing view are often confused with appeals to spite. The ad hominem can be a similar appeal to a negative emotion, but differs from it in directly criticizing the villain—that is unnecessary in an appeal to spite, where hatred for the disfavored party is assumed.
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
- "Why shouldn't prisoners do hard labor? The places are full of scumbags!"
- "Stop that recycling! Aren't we tired of Hollywood celebrities preaching about saving the Earth?"
- "Why should they even have more? I got nothing from the state and look at what I had to give off to pay for my own studies!"
- "Not the opera, Hitler loved that, let's go to the circus instead."