Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. This includes the freedom to change a religion or belief, and to manifest a religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance, subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with law" and "necessary in a democratic society".

Article text

Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change her/his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest her/his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.

2. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

History

• Cuius regio, eius religio was a principle of European international law, beginning in the 16th century in the wake of the Protestant reformation, that established freedom of religion for states, but not individuals.
• The First Amendment to the United States Constitution was one of the first legal protections for freedom of religion without reference to any specific religion.
• Article X of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which influenced the European Convention, declares freedom of religious opinion as a universal right.

Case law

• European Court of Human Rights:
  • Buscarini and Others v. San Marino (requirement of religious oaths for public office not permitted)
  • Kokkinakis v. Greece (criminalization of proselytism, as defined in Greek law, permitted)
  • Leyla Şahin v. Turkey (university ban on Islamic headscarf permitted)
  • Pichon and Sajous v. France (no right to refuse supply of contraceptives on religious grounds)
  • Leela Förderkreis E.V. and Others v. Germany (regarding state information campaigns about a religious movement)
  • Universelles Leben e.V. v. Germany (regarding state information campaigns about a religious movement)
  • Lautsi v. Italy (legal requirement to display a crucifix in school classrooms permitted)
  • S.A.S. v. France (French ban on face coverings permitted)
  • Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland (permitted to require children to participate in mixed swimming lessons and enforce this through fines)
• High Court of England and Wales:
  • Connolly v DPP (no ground for appeal under Article 9 against conviction for sending indecent or grossly offensive material, namely images of aborted foetuses)