 The elements of the power set of the set {x, y, z} ordered with respect to inclusion.

In mathematics, the axiom of power set is one of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms of axiomatic set theory.

In the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, the axiom reads:

$\forall x\,\exists y\,\forall z\,[z\in y\iff \forall w\,(w\in z\Rightarrow w\in x)]$ where y is the power set of x, ${\mathcal {P))(x)$ .

In English, this says:

Given any set x, there is a set ${\mathcal {P))(x)$ such that, given any set z, this set z is a member of ${\mathcal {P))(x)$ if and only if every element of z is also an element of x.

More succinctly: for every set $x$ , there is a set ${\mathcal {P))(x)$ consisting precisely of the subsets of $x$ .

Note the subset relation $\subseteq$ is not used in the formal definition as subset is not a primitive relation in formal set theory; rather, subset is defined in terms of set membership, $\in$ . By the axiom of extensionality, the set ${\mathcal {P))(x)$ is unique.

The axiom of power set appears in most axiomatizations of set theory. It is generally considered uncontroversial, although constructive set theory prefers a weaker version to resolve concerns about predicativity.

## Consequences

The power set axiom allows a simple definition of the Cartesian product of two sets $X$ and $Y$ :

$X\times Y=\{(x,y):x\in X\land y\in Y\}.$ Notice that

$x,y\in X\cup Y$ $\{x\},\{x,y\}\in {\mathcal {P))(X\cup Y)$ and, for example, considering a model using the Kuratowski ordered pair,

$(x,y)=\{\{x\},\{x,y\}\}\in {\mathcal {P))({\mathcal {P))(X\cup Y))$ and thus the Cartesian product is a set since

$X\times Y\subseteq {\mathcal {P))({\mathcal {P))(X\cup Y)).$ One may define the Cartesian product of any finite collection of sets recursively:

$X_{1}\times \cdots \times X_{n}=(X_{1}\times \cdots \times X_{n-1})\times X_{n}.$ Note that the existence of the Cartesian product can be proved without using the power set axiom, as in the case of the Kripke–Platek set theory.

## Limitations

The power set axiom does not specify what subsets of a set exist, only that there is a set containing all those that do. Not all conceivable subsets are guaranteed to exist. In particular, the power set of an infinite set would contain only "constructible sets" if the universe is the constructible universe but in other models of ZF set theory could contain sets that are not constructible.

1. ^ Devlin, Keith (1984). Constructibility. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 56–57. ISBN 3-540-13258-9. Retrieved 8 January 2023.
• Paul Halmos, Naive set theory. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1960. Reprinted by Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974. ISBN 0-387-90092-6 (Springer-Verlag edition).
• Jech, Thomas, 2003. Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.
• Kunen, Kenneth, 1980. Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs. Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-86839-9.