The Court of Exchequer
Court of Exchequer, Westminster Hall
JurisdictionEngland
LocationWestminster
Composition methodby appointment only
Authorized byConstitutional Monarchy
Number of positions5
Chief Baron of Exchequer

The Barons of the Exchequer, or barones scaccarii, were the judges of the English court known as the Exchequer of Pleas. The Barons consisted of a Chief Baron of the Exchequer and several puisne (inferior) barons. When Robert Shute was appointed second baron in June 1579 the patent declared "he shall be reputed and be of the same order, rank, estimation, dignity and pre-eminence to all intents and purposes as any puisne judge of either of the two other courts."[1] The rise of commercial trade in Elizabethan England occasioned fraudulent application of the Quo minus writ. More taxation demanded staff at the exchequer to sift an increase in the case load causing more widespread litigation cases to come to the court. From the 1580s onwards the Barons of Exchequer were no longer held in such low regard, and more likely to be Serjeants-at-law before qualification. The Inns of Courts began to exclude solicitors, and held posts for judges and barons open equally to barristers. In 1591, Regulations reflected a case in which the Lord Keeper Egerton banned solicitors from seeking cases in the Exchequer.

Together they sat as a court of common law, heard suits in the court of equity, and settled revenue disputes. A puisne baron was styled "Mr Baron X" and the chief baron as "Lord Chief Baron X".

They were originally the same judges as those of the Court of King's Bench, only becoming independent positions after the Exchequer's separation from the curia regis.[2] In the early years of the Exchequer's existence, the Barons were the chief auditors of the accounts of England, a role passed to dedicated auditors during the reign of Edward II.[3] With the Exchequer's expansion during the Tudor era, the Barons became more important; where previously only the Chief Baron had been appointed from the serjeants-at-law, with the other Barons mere barristers, it became practice for all Barons of the Exchequer to be Serjeants. This further increased the Exchequer's standing, since for the first time it put the Exchequer at the same level as the Court of Common Pleas and Court of King's Bench, where all judges were already required to be Serjeants.[4] Prior to the changes of 1533, Serjeants held precedence over barons "sitting in the high court,...of great eminence". Thereafter they held the degree of coif to qualify at the Inns of Court as the senior court at Westminster.[5]

From 1550 to 1579, there was a major distinction between the chief baron and the second, third and fourth puisne barons. The difference was in social status and education. All of the chief barons had been trained as lawyers in the inns of court. With the exception of Henry Bradshaw and Sir Clement Higham, both barristers-at-law, all of the chief barons who served Elizabeth I, had attained the highest and most prestigious rank of a lawyer, serjeant-at-law. By 1841, the equitable jurisdiction was transferred to the Court of Chancery, which deals with pecuniary cases.

History

By 1272, individuals were nominated to the office of Baron of the Exchequer from time to time: 24 baronial justiciers were appointed by the end of Henry III's reign. From 1278, there were three Barons, with a fourth being appointed in 1296 and a fifth in 1299. By 1308, one of the Barons was recognised as Capitalem Baronem (Chief Baron). Edward I commanded the Exchequer sessions to be held at Hilary term.[6] By the reforms of the reign of King Richard II, barons were not necessarily qualified special pleaders or serjeants; office was in the gift of the king, and barons were not usually permitted to refuse appointment. From then until 1478, it was recognised that there should be four puisne Barons. One was frequently named as Second Baron and rarely appointments were named as Third Baron and Fourth Baron. From then until 1547, the three puisne barons were always appointed to numbered offices, but in 1549, Edward Saxleby as successor to John Darnall was merely appointed as 'one of the Barons of the Exchequer'. However, he and his successors held the office of Cursitor Baron.[clarification needed] An additional Baron was appointed in 1604. The number of puisnes generally remained at three until the 19th century, but there was a fourth from 1708 to 1725 due to John Smith having leave of absence to attend to the office of a Baron of the Scottish Exchequer. A fourth puisne baron was appointed in 1830 and a fifth in 1868.[7]

Puisne barons

This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. (February 2014)

Cursitor baron

See also

References

  1. ^ Dugdale, Chronica: series 94; Foss, Judges of England, vol.II, 410.
  2. ^ Thomas (1848) p.3
  3. ^ Thomas (1848) p.9
  4. ^ Guth (2008) p.151
  5. ^ Sir Edward Coke, Preface to Coke's 10th Law Report.
  6. ^ Rotuli Parliamentorum, ii, 442.
  7. ^ Sir John Sainty (comp.) The Judges of England, 1272-1990: a list of the judges of the Superior courts (Selden Society: Supplementary Series 1993, 10), 103-6.
  8. ^ Madox, ii, 28, 320; Calendares Inquisitiones Post Mortem: i, 62.
  9. ^ Calendares Inquisitionem Post Mortem, i, 156.
  10. ^ New Foedera: i, 934; ii, 15, 175, 273, 333; Madox, ii, 58.
  11. ^ left office because he was murdered on the road to Leicester. Madox, ii, 60; Abbreviatio Placitorum Origines, ii, 6, 171.
  12. ^ Nicholas Madox, Writs of the Exchequer: ii, 267-269.; Nisi Foedera, ii, 1005; Foss, The Judges of England, iii, 427.
  13. ^ Parliamentary Writs, ii, P; ii, 527.
  14. ^ Parliamentary Writs, ii, P, ii, 194.
  15. ^ Calendares Rotuli Parliamentorum, 106; Rotuli Origines, ii, 78, 81.
  16. ^ Dugdale, Chronica Series
  17. ^ Abreviatio Placitorum; Rotuli Origines, ii, 91, 261.
  18. ^ Abbreviatio Placitorum; Rotuli Origines, i, 39; ii, 17; Rotuli Parliamentorum, ii, 105.
  19. ^ Walter Dugdale, Origines: 102.
  20. ^ Calendares Rotuli Patentum, 126.
  21. ^ Kalendaris Exchequer: i, 165.
  22. ^ Abbreviatio Placitorum; Rotuli Origenes, ii, 91, 192, 205, 219; Rotuli Parliamentorum, ii, 453.
  23. ^ Abbreviatio Placitorum; Rotuli Origines, ii, 205.
  24. ^ William Devon, Issue Roll: 44 Edw. III., 112, 346; Calendar Inquisition Post Mortem, ii, 315.
  25. ^ Devon, Issue Roll, 133, 209, 256.
  26. ^ Calendares Rotuli Patentum, 189.
  27. ^ Liberate Roll 5 Henry IV (1404); Foss, The Judges of England, vol.III, 135.
  28. ^ Kalendars of the Exchequer, iii, 302; Foss, Judges of England, 88.
  29. ^ "FRAY, John (d.1461), of London and Munden Furnival, Herts.publisher= History of Parliament Online". Retrieved 21 March 2018.
  30. ^ 1446; Common Pleas record: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT1/H6/CP40no740/bCP40no740dorses/IMG_1156.htm
  31. ^ 8 Note; Sir William Dugdale: Chronica Series; Calendares Rotuli Patentum: 300, 316.
  32. ^ Collins, Peerage: ii, 444; Plumpton Correspondence: lxxxiii, 8.
  33. ^ Rotuli Parliamentorum: v, 472, 529; vi, 97; Red Book of Exchequer
  34. ^ Calendar of State Papers, 1509, 263.
  35. ^ Rotuli Patentum, 4 Eliz., p.2; Foss, vol.V, p.534.
  36. ^ The Orlebar Chronicles in Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire, 1553-1733, or the Children of the Manorhouse and their Posterity; by Frederica St. John Orlebar. Pub. Mitchell Hughes and Clarke, London, 1930. Back Matter, page 316 – Orlebar Pedigree: ... Jane, daughter of Robert Shute of Hockington, co. Cambridge (ancestor of Barrington Viscounts (Ireland, c.1720); Baron of the Exchequer 1579).
  37. ^ Baker, J.H. (1984). Order of Serjeants-at-law. Selden Society. pp. 364, 439. ISBN 978-0854232031.
  38. ^ "Edward Henden".
  39. ^ dismissed a suspected Papist.
  40. ^ dismissed a suspected Papist.
  41. ^ dismissed a suspected Papist. Foss, Biographia Juridica, 117-118.
  42. ^ died of a brain haemmorrhage. Gentleman's Magazine: xxxvii, 91.
  43. ^ Dod's Peerage: (1870)
  44. ^ Foss, Judges, vi, 189-190; Historical Manuscript Commission Hatfield, xviii, 195, 219.
  45. ^ Calendar of State Papers Domestic, 1603-10, 613.
  46. ^ TNA, C220/15/8/60.
  47. ^ Luttrell, i, 557.
  48. ^ Parliamentary History: vol.v, 362.
Categories