Bone conduction is the conduction of sound to the inner ear primarily through the bones of the skull, allowing the hearer to perceive audio content even if the ear canal is blocked. Bone conduction transmission occurs constantly as sound waves vibrate bone, specifically the bones in the skull, although it is hard for the average individual to distinguish sound being conveyed through the bone as opposed to the sound being conveyed through the air via the ear canal. Intentional transmission of sound through bone can be used with individuals with normal hearing — as with bone-conduction headphones — or as a treatment option for certain types of hearing impairment. Bones are generally more effective at transmitting lower-frequency sounds compared to higher-frequency sounds.

Overview

Bone conduction is one reason why a person's voice sounds different to them when it is recorded and played back. Because the skull conducts lower frequencies better than air, people perceive their own voices to be lower and fuller than others do, and a recording of one's own voice frequently sounds higher than one expects (see voice confrontation).[1][2]

Musicians may use bone conduction using a tuning fork while tuning stringed instruments. After the fork starts vibrating, placing it in the mouth with the stem between the back teeth ensures that one continues to hear the note via bone conduction, and both hands are free to do the tuning.[3] Ludwig van Beethoven was famously rumored to be using bone conduction after losing most of his hearing, by placing one end of a rod in his mouth and resting the other end on the rim of his piano.[4]

It has also been observed that some animals can perceive sound and even communicate by sending and receiving vibration through bone.[5]

Comparison of hearing sensitivity through bone conduction and directly through the ear canal can aid audiologists in identifying pathologies of the middle ear—the area between the tympanic membrane (ear drum) and the cochlea (inner ear). If hearing is markedly better through bone conduction than through the ear canal (air-bone gap),[6] problems with the ear canal (e.g. ear wax accumulation), the tympanic membrane or ossicles can be suspected.[7] This method was first discovered by Italian physician Hieronymus Capivacci.[8]

Hearing aids and implants

Image of a Vintage Acousticon Hearing Aid By Dictograph Products Company, Made in the US, Circa 1934.

History

The first bone conduction hearing aids were invented in the 15th century. Italian physician Girolamo Cardano realized that when a rod was placed between someone's teeth and attached the other end to a musical instrument, the person could hear the music despite their hearing loss.[9] This method was used by Beethoven, as his hearing deteriorated towards the end of his life.[10] In the 1820s, French physician Jean Marc Gaspard Itard improved on this device by attaching the other end of the rod not to a musical instrument but to the mouth of another speaker. This invention was known as the Rod of Itard.[8] In 1923, Hugo Gernsback created a new kind of bone conduction hearing aid called the "Osophone",[11] which he later elaborated on with his "Phonosone".[12] Bone conduction hearing aids have also been fitted to glasses, which fit tightly to the side of the head.[13]

In the 1970s, a team of doctors in Gothenburg, most notably Anders Tjellström, had the idea to implant a bone vibrator plate into the mastoid bone with an adjoining screw that allowed an external audio processor to be attached to conduct sound. The first three patients were implanted in 1977. The device gave good results and became known as a bone-anchored hearing aid, or BAHA.[9] In 2012, this idea was taken a step further by the introduction of the BONEBRIDGE device. Whereas a BAHA implant is a percutaneous device that requires the screw abutment to protrude through the skin, the BONEBRIDGE is a transcutaneous device and is fully implanted under the skin. In this case, the audio processor is held in place by magnets.[14]

Candidacy

Bone conduction devices are suitable for patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss, with a functioning cochlea but problems with the outer or inner ear that prevent sound vibrations from reaching the cochlea.[15] This can be caused by conditions such as atresia, microtia, Goldenhar syndrome or Treacher Collins.[16] Bone conduction is also a good option for someone who cannot use traditional air conduction hearing aids.[15]

Bone conduction devices are also used to help people with single-sided deafness, who have a non-functioning inner ear on one side. In this situation, the device picks up sounds on the non-functioning side and sends them as vibrations through the bone to the functioning cochlea on the other side.[17]

Technology

There are many different types of bone conduction hearing aids but most of them work on the same principle and comprise necessary components like microphones, signal processing, energy supply and a transducer that generates vibrations. The microphone of the hearing aid picks up sound signals from the environment. The signal is then optimized and transmitted to the transducer, which generates vibrations. Depending on the specific bone conduction hearing aid system, the vibrations are either sent directly through the skull bone, or through the skin towards the inner ear. Finally, the inner ear picks up the vibrations and sends them to the auditory cortex in the brain.

Different bone conduction devices contain different features. Here are the key ones.

Surgical and non-surgical bone conduction devices

Surgical bone conduction devices consist of an internal implant and an external audio processor used to transmit sound. They require surgery in order to implant the device, which is usually done as an outpatient procedure under general anesthetic,[18] however this depends on the device being implanted and the health condition of the patient.

Non-surgical devices only consist of the external audio processor. The processor simply vibrates, making both the skin and the bone vibrate, conducting the vibrations through to the cochlea. Non-surgical devices are ideal for children, who may not be old enough for implantation surgery or who have temporary conductive hearing loss caused by glue ear or ear infections.[19]

There are various ways to attach non-surgical bone conduction devices to the skin, including headbands, adhesives[20] and bone conduction glasses.[13] Devices include the ADHEAR from MED-EL,[21] the BAHA Start from Cochlear,[22] BHM's contact mini or contact forte[23] and the Ponto Softband from Oticon Medical.[24] Unlike headbands or glasses-based devices, adhesive devices do not need to apply pressure against the head in order to transmit the vibration. Because of this, users of adhesive devices report wearing their device for longer each day.[25]

Surgical devices: percutaneous and transcutaneous devices

A transcutaneous bone conduction device transmits sound signals, either electronic or mechanical, through the skin. In other words, there is closed, intact skin between the external audio processor and the internal implant. The processor is held in place over the implant using magnetic attraction. Transcutaneous devices currently on the market include the BAHA Attract,[26] and Osia[27] from Cochlear and the BONEBRIDGE from MED-EL.[28] With a percutaneous device, part of the implant (known as the abutment) protrudes through the skin. The audio processor then snaps onto the abutment, providing a direct connection to the implant.[29] Percutaneous devices include the BAHA Connect from Cochlear[30] and the Ponto from Oticon Medical.[31] Percutaneous devices have been associated with skin complications, ranging from slight redness to the formation of granulation tissue and recurring infection. The most serious complications might require further surgery or abutment removal and subsequent reimplantation.[32] One study into skin problems with percutaneous implants revealed a complication rate of up to 84%.[33] In another study a meta-analysis of complications with osseointegrated hearing aids showed that revision surgery is required in up to 34.5% of cases.[34] Transcutaneous devices were later designed to avoid or reduce recurring skin complications.[17] For example, only 1.85% of patients with the BONEBRIDGE experience wound infections post-surgery.[citation needed]

Surgical devices: active and passive

An active bone conduction device is one where the implant generates the vibrations that directly stimulate the bone. With a passive bone conduction device, the vibrations are generated by the audio processor before being passed through the skin or an abutment to reach the implant and the bone.[35] The main active bone conduction devices available are the BONEBRIDGE from MED-EL[28] and the Osia from Cochlear.[36] Both are active transcutaneous devices. The external audio processor picks up sound vibrations and transmits them electronically through the skin to the internal implant, which directly and actively vibrates the bone. These vibrations are conducted through the skull bone to the cochlea and are processed as normal.[35]

The main passive bone conduction devices are the BAHA Attract[37] and BAHA Connect[38] from Cochlear, the Ponto from Oticon[39] and the Alpha 2 MPO from Medtronic.[40] The BAHA Connect and Ponto are passive percutaneous devices, whereby the audio processor is fixed onto an abutment placed through the skin. The audio processor vibrates, sending the vibrations via the abutment to the implant and then through the bone to the cochlea.[35] The BAHA Attract and Alpha 2 are transcutaneous devices but they work in a similar way. The audio processor vibrates, sending mechanical vibrations to the implant through the bone. However, unlike with the percutaneous devices, the vibrations from the audio processor pass through the skin before they reach the internal implant. These vibrations are then conducted through the skull bones to the cochlea and are processed as normal, just like with an active device.[35]

Active transcutaneous and passive percutaneous bone conduction devices tend to deliver better sound quality than passive transcutaneous ones. Passive transcutaneous devices send sound vibrations through the skin, and as they pass through the skin, they lose some of their strength, causing signal attenuation of up to 20dB.[17] To counteract this, passive transcutaneous devices may require the use of strong magnets that squeeze the skin to achieve optimal conduction. This can lead to pain and irritation of the skin and soft tissue between the two magnets, and in worst cases cause necrosis.[17] A study found that major complications — defined as complications requiring active management, such as post-operative seroma, hematoma, wound infections, skin ulcerations, and dehiscence — were found in 5.2% of cases.[41]

Device Overview

Device Surgical Non-surgical Active surgical Passive surgical Transcutaneous surgical Percutaneous surgical
ADHEAR x ✓ N/A N/A N/A N/A
Alpha 2 ✓ x x ✓ ✓ * (see above)
BAHA Attract ✓ x x ✓ ✓ * (see above) X
BAHA Connect ✓ x x


✓ X ✓
BAHA Start x ✓ N/A N/A N/A N/A
BONEBRIDGE ✓ x ✓ x ✓ x
Osia ✓ x ✓ x ✓ x
Ponto ✓ x x ✓ x ✓

Products

Bone conduction products are usually categorized into three groups:

A bone conduction headset (GoldenDance brand)

One example of a specialized communication product is a bone conduction speaker that is used by scuba divers. The device is a rubber over-moulded, piezoelectric flexing disc that is approximately 40 millimetres (1.6 in) across and 6 millimetres (0.24 in) thick. A connecting cable is molded into the disc, resulting in a tough, waterproof assembly. In use, the speaker is strapped against one of the dome-shaped bone protrusions behind the ear and the sound, which can be surprisingly clear and crisp, seems to come from inside the user's head.[42]

Notable uses

The Google Glass device employs bone conduction technology for the relay of information to the user through a transducer that sits beside the user's ear. The use of bone conduction means that any vocal content that is received by the Glass user is nearly inaudible to outsiders.[43]

German broadcaster Sky Deutschland and advertising agency BBDO Germany collaborated on an advertising campaign that uses bone conduction that was premiered in Cannes, France at the International Festival of Creativity in June 2013. The "Talking Window" advertising concept uses bone conduction to transmit advertising to public transport passengers who lean their heads against train glass windows. Academics from Australia's Macquarie University suggested that, apart from not touching the window, passengers would need to use a dampening device that is made of material that would not transmit the vibration from the window in order to not hear the sound.[44][45]

Land Rover BAR employed 'military' bone conduction technology, designed by BAE Systems, within their helmets for use within the 2017 America's Cup.[46] The helmets allowed the crews to communicate effectively with each other under race conditions and within the harsh, noisy environment; whilst maintaining situational awareness due to their ears being uncovered.[47]

In March 2019 at The National Maritime Museum, London, British composer Hollie Harding premiered the use of Bone Conduction Headphones as part of a musical performance.[48] The use of the technology allowed the audience to listen to a pre-recorded musical track on the headsets, whilst a live orchestra performed a separate but related musical track. This multilayered effect meant that electronic and digitally-edited sounds could be heard in conjunction with live music without the use of loud-speakers for the first time and that the source of sounds could appear to be close to, far from, or all around the listener.

Research has found that the use of bone conduction headphones can help people distinguish between their own voice and the voice of others.[49] The findings have potential clinical relevance for conditions such as schizophrenia.[49]

Safety

Because bone conduction headphones transmit sound to the inner ear through the bones of the skull, leaving the ears free to pick up sound from the environment, users can listen to audio while maintaining greater situational awareness than with acoustic in- or over-ear headphones. However, users may still be less aware of their environment than if not using headphones.[50]

See also

References

  1. ^ Zhi Cai; Alan G. Madsen; Douglas G. Richards; Martin L. Lenhardt (2002). "Response of Human Skull to Bone Conducted Sound in the Audiometric to Ultrasonic Range". Virginia Commonwealth University. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  2. ^ Brent Zupp (2003–2012). "Why Does Your Voice Sound Different on a Recording?". Wanderings. Brent Zupp. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  3. ^ Dan Fox (1996). Teach Yourself to Play Mandolin. Alfred Music Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7390-0286-5. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
  4. ^ Liam did this. "Bone Conduction: How it Works". www.goldendance.co.jp. Retrieved 2018-11-13.
  5. ^ "Elephants pick up good vibrations -- through their feet: 3/01". news.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 2022-11-28. Retrieved 2023-03-23.
  6. ^ Maltby, Maryanne Tate. (2012). A supplementary dictionary of audiology (1st ed.). [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-965146-7. OCLC 822262757.
  7. ^ "Conductive Hearing Loss". American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Retrieved 2019-06-29.
  8. ^ a b "Origins of Bone Conduction Hearing". Wayne's World. 2012-03-26. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  9. ^ a b Mudry, Albert; Tjellström, Anders (2011). "Historical Background of Bone Conduction Hearing Devices and Bone Conduction Hearing Aids". Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Aids. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 71: 1–9. doi:10.1159/000323569. ISBN 978-3-8055-9700-5. PMID 21389699.
  10. ^ "How a deaf Beethoven discovered bone conduction by attaching a rod to his piano and clenching it in his teeth". ZME Science. 2021-05-26. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  11. ^ US 1521287, Gernsback, Hugo, "Acoustic Apparatus", published 19 May 1923, issued 30 December 1924 
  12. ^ Kennedy, T. R. Jr. (1958). "From Coherer to Spacistor" (PDF). Radio-Electronics. Gernsback Publications. 29 (4): 45–59. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-05-27. Retrieved 2010-06-01.
  13. ^ a b "Bone Conduction Glasses - Spectacle Hearing Aids". www.spectaclehearingsystems.co.uk. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  14. ^ Håkansson, B.; Eeg-Olofsson, M.; Reinfeldt, S.; Stenfelt, S.; Granström, G. (2008). "Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant System". Otology & Neurotology. 29 (8): 1132–1139. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816fdc90. PMID 18769364. S2CID 12593723.
  15. ^ "Bone conduction hearing devices | Hearing implants". www.ndcs.org.uk. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  16. ^ a b c d Ellsperman, Susan E.; Nairn, Emily M.; Stucken, Emily Z. (2021-05-18). "Review of Bone Conduction Hearing Devices". Audiology Research. 11 (2): 207–219. doi:10.3390/audiolres11020019. ISSN 2039-4330. PMC 8161441. PMID 34069846.
  17. ^ "Bone Conduction Hearing Aids". Duke Health. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  18. ^ "Devices worn on a headband | Bone conduction hearing devices". www.ndcs.org.uk. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  19. ^ "Everything You Need To Know About BAHA Implants for Children | CCHAT Sacramento". www.cchatsacramento.org. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  20. ^ "ADHEAR | Savannah, GA". ahassavannah.com. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  21. ^ "What is Baha Start - Southern ENT - News - A Better Africa". a-better-africa.com. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  22. ^ "contact mini - Pediatric bone conduction hearing aid by BHM-Tech Produktionsgesellschaft | MedicalExpo". www.medicalexpo.com. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  23. ^ "The New Ponto Softband from Oticon Medical Supports Early Access to Sound". AudiologyOnline. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  24. ^ Dahm, Valerie; Auinger, Alice B.; Liepins, Rudolfs; Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter; Riss, Dominik; Arnoldner, Christoph (June 2019). "A Randomized Cross-over Trial Comparing a Pressure-free, Adhesive to a Conventional Bone Conduction Hearing Device". Otology & Neurotology. 40 (5): 571–577. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002184. ISSN 1531-7129. PMID 31083074.
  25. ^ "Baha Attract". University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  26. ^ Limited, Cochlear. "FDA clears Cochlear's innovative new Osia 2 hearing implant system". www.prnewswire.com (Press release). Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  27. ^ a b "Bonebridge, Medel". Ears & Hearing UK. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  28. ^ Håkansson, B.; Tjellström, A.; Carlsson, P. (April 1990). "Percutaneous vs. transcutaneous transducers for hearing by direct bone conduction". Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. 102 (4): 339–344. doi:10.1177/019459989010200407. ISSN 0194-5998. PMID 2113260. S2CID 25857058.
  29. ^ "Bone Conduction Hearing Aids". Johns Hopkins Medicine. 15 December 2022. Archived from the original on 18 April 2023.
  30. ^ "The Oticon Ponto System". berkshearing.com. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  31. ^ "Percutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant System: A Feasibility Study on a Cadaver Head". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  32. ^ Mohamad, Shwan; Khan, Imran; Hey, S. Y.; Hussain, S. S. Musheer (March 2016). "A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques". European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology. 273 (3): 559–565. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3436-1. ISSN 1434-4726. PMID 25503356. S2CID 10886157.
  33. ^ Kiringoda, Ruwan; Lustig, Lawrence R. (July 2013). "A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids". Otology & Neurotology. 34 (5): 790–794. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318291c651. ISSN 1537-4505. PMID 23739555. S2CID 10274270.
  34. ^ a b c d "Different types of surgical implant | Bone conduction hearing devices". www.ndcs.org.uk. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  35. ^ Limited, Cochlear. "FDA clears Cochlear's innovative new Osia® 2 hearing implant system". www.prnewswire.com (Press release). Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  36. ^ "Baha® Attract". Auditory Implant Service. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  37. ^ "Baha – The Implantable Hearing Device". www.hopkinsmedicine.org. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  38. ^ "The Oticon Ponto System | A Complete Hearing Solution". berkshearing.com. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  39. ^ "Sophono Medtronic Alpha 2 MPO Processor". Getremed. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  40. ^ Cooper, Timothy; McDonald, Brendan; Ho, Allan (October 2017). "Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Systematic Review". Otology & Neurotology. 38 (9): 1225–1232. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001518. ISSN 1537-4505. PMID 28719403.
  41. ^ Banks, Lindsey. "The History of Bone Conduction". gettysburg.edu. Archived from the original on 15 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2015.
  42. ^ Charles Arthur (2 July 2013). "Google Glass – hands-on review". The Guardian. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  43. ^ Catherine McMahon; Phillip Nakad (12 July 2013). "Bone conduction: the new front in guerilla advertising". The Conversation Australia. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
  44. ^ Leo Kelion (3 July 2013). "Talking train window adverts tested by Sky Deutschland". BBC News. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
  45. ^ Racing, Ben Ainslie. "The challenge of onboard communication - Land Rover Ben Ainslie Racing". land-rover-bar.americascup.com. Archived from the original on 2017-09-05. Retrieved 2018-01-12.
  46. ^ "Our bone conduction technology is set to raise the bar in Bermuda | BAE Systems | International". BAE Systems | International. Retrieved 2018-01-12.
  47. ^ "Concert: Melting, Shifting, Liquid World". Royal Museums Greenwich | UNESCO World Heritage Site In London. 2019-01-29. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  48. ^ a b Dolan, Eric W. (2023-04-08). "Your own voice "is not just a sound": Bone-conduction tech offers new insights into voice perception". PsyPost. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  49. ^ May, Kennan R.; Walker, Bruce N. (May 2017). "The effects of distractor sounds presented through bone conduction headphones on the localization of critical environmental sounds". Applied Ergonomics. 61: 144–158. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.01.009. PMID 28237013.((cite journal)): CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Categories