Boundary cells (also known as border cells or boundary vector cells) are neurons found in the hippocampal formation that respond to the presence of an environmental boundary at a particular distance and direction from an animal. The existence of cells with these firing characteristics were first predicted on the basis of properties of place cells. Boundary cells were subsequently discovered in several regions of the hippocampal formation: the subiculum, presubiculum and entorhinal cortex.

Firing of a boundary cell recorded in rat subiculum in 1 x 1 metre square-walled box with 50 cm-high walls. A 50 cm-long barrier inserted into box elicits second field along north side of barrier in addition to original field along south wall. Left: Firing rate map, one of 5 colours in locational bin indicates spatially-smoothed firing rate in that bin (autoscaled to firing rate peak, dark blue: 0-20%; light blue: 20-40%; green: 40-60%; yellow: 60-80%; red: 80-100%. The maximum firing rate is 14.2 Hz). Right: path taken by rat is shown in black, locations where spikes were recorded indicated by green squares.

O'Keefe and Burgess[1] had noted that the firing fields of place cells, which characteristically respond only in a circumscribed area of an animal's environment, tended to fire in 'corresponding' locations when the shape and size of the environment was altered. For example, a place cell that fired in the northeastern corner of a rectangular environment might continue to fire in the northeastern corner when the size of the environment was doubled. To explain these observations, the Burgess and O'Keefe groups developed a computational model[2][3] (Boundary Vector Cell - or BVC - model) of place cells that relied on inputs sensitive to the geometry of the environment to determine where a given place cell would fire in environments of different shapes and sizes. The hypothetical input cells (BVCs) responded to environmental boundaries at particular distances and allocentric directions from the rat.

Separate studies emerging from different research groups identified cells with these characteristics in the subiculum,[4][5] entorhinal cortex[6][7] and pre- and para-subiculum[8] where they were described variously as "BVCs", "boundary cells" and "border cells". These terms are somewhat interchangeable; the critical defining functional characteristics of associated with the different labelling schemes are rather arbitrary and any functional differences in cells found in different anatomical regions are not yet fully clear. For example, neurons classified as "border cells" may include some that fire at short range to any environmental boundary (regardless of direction). Additionally, the BVC model predicted the existence of a small proportion of cells with longer range tunings (i.e., firing parallel to, but at some distance from boundaries) and few such cells have been described to date. In general, although the general predictions of the BVC model regarding the existence of geometric boundary sensitive inputs were confirmed by the empirical observations it prompted, the more detailed characteristics such as the distribution of distance and direction tunings remain to be determined.

In medial entorhinal cortex border/boundary cells comprise about 10% of local population, being intermingled with grid cells and head direction cells. During development MEC border cells (and HD cells but not grid cells) show adult-like firing fields as soon as rats are able to freely explore their environment at around 16-18 days old. This suggests HD and border cells, rather than grid cells, provide the first critical spatial input to hippocampal place cells.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ O'Keefe, J.; Burgess, N. (1996). "Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons". Nature. 381 (6581): 425–428. Bibcode:1996Natur.381..425O. doi:10.1038/381425a0. PMID 8632799. S2CID 4345249.
  2. ^ Hartley, T.; Burgess, N.; Lever, C.; Cacucci, F.; O'Keefe, J. (2000). "Modeling place fields in terms of the cortical inputs to the hippocampus". Hippocampus. 10 (4): 369–379. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.19.7928. doi:10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<369::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO;2-0. PMID 10985276.
  3. ^ Burgess, N.; Jackson, A.; Hartley, T.; O'Keefe, J. (2000). "Predictions derived from modelling the hippocampal role in navigation". Biological Cybernetics. 83 (3): 301–312. doi:10.1007/s004220000172. PMID 11007303. S2CID 8392843.
  4. ^ Barry, C.; Lever, C.; Hayman, R.; Hartley, T.; Burton, S.; O'Keefe, J.; Jeffery, K.; Burgess, N. (2006). "The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory". Reviews in the Neurosciences. 17 (1–2): 71–97. doi:10.1515/REVNEURO.2006.17.1-2.71. PMC 2677716. PMID 16703944.
  5. ^ Lever, C.; Burton, S.; Jeewajee, A.; O'Keefe, J.; Burgess, N. (2009). "Boundary Vector Cells in the Subiculum of the Hippocampal Formation". Journal of Neuroscience. 29 (31): 9771–9777. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1319-09.2009. PMC 2736390. PMID 19657030.
  6. ^ Solstad, T.; Boccara, C. N.; Kropff, E.; Moser, M. -B.; Moser, E. I. (2008). "Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex". Science. 322 (5909): 1865–1868. Bibcode:2008Sci...322.1865S. doi:10.1126/science.1166466. PMID 19095945.
  7. ^ Savelli, F.; Yoganarasimha, D.; Knierim, J. J. (2008). "Influence of boundary removal on the spatial representations of the medial entorhinal cortex". Hippocampus. 18 (12): 1270–1282. doi:10.1002/hipo.20511. PMC 3007674. PMID 19021262.
  8. ^ Boccara, C. N.; Sargolini, F.; Thoresen, V. Y. H.; Solstad, T.; Witter, M. P.; Moser, E. I.; Moser, M. B. (2010). "Grid cells in pre- and parasubiculum". Nature Neuroscience. 13 (8): 987–994. doi:10.1038/nn.2602. PMID 20657591. S2CID 7851286.
  9. ^ Bjerknes, T. L.; Moser, E. I.; Moser, M. B. (2014). "Representation of geometric borders in the developing rat" (PDF). Neuron. 82 (1): 71–8. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.014. PMID 24613417.

External links

Category