To do[edit]

Deletion

Nominate for deletion any categories that are no longer used. Currently pending confirmation:

Standardization

Documentation

All categories should list at minimum:

Expansion

  • For a template that takes no unnamed parameters:
((#if: (({1|))} | [[Category:Articles using extra parameters]]))
  • For a template that takes 2 unnamed parameters:
((#if: (({3|))} | [[Category:Articles using extra parameters]]))
  • Verify day is between 1 and 31 inclusive
((#ifexpr: (({day))} > 0 and (({day))} < 32 | | [[Category:Articles with invalid day parameter]]))
  • Verify month is between 1 and 12 inclusive
((#ifexpr: (({month))} > 0 and (({month))} < 13 | | [[Category:Articles with invalid month parameter]]))
  • Verify year is sane. For example, a template tracking last access date of websites could use:
((#ifexpr: (({year))} > 1990 and (({year))} <= ((CURRENTYEAR)) | | [[Category:Articles with invalid year parameter]]))
((#if: (({depreciated|))} | [[Category:Articles using depreciated parameters]]))
((#switch: (({importance))}
| high = [[Category:High-importance articles]]
| low = [[Category:Low-importance articles]]
| [[Category:Articles with invalid importance]]
))
((#ifeq: ((NAMESPACE)) | Category | | [[Category:Category templates used outside categories]]))

samsubit TASCIIAC (talk) 08:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

Shouldn't "depreciated" be "deprecated"? ~ MD Otley (talk) 09:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sbitpelling TASCIIAC (talk) 07:59, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diffuse subcategories?[edit]

This category has developed an awful lot of subcategories, and is looking pretty unstructured at the moment. How about splitting it up into parameter issues of different types? I'm thinking of:

I'd love to hear people's thoughts on this. Feel free to suggest different schemes and names, etc. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:58, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]