Chilantaisaurus was a large theropod, measuring 11 metres (36 ft) long and weighing 2.5–4 metric tons (2.8–4.4 short tons).[2][3][4] While Brusatte et al. (2010) estimated that Chilantaisaurus might have weighed about 6 metric tons (6.6 short tons) based on femur length similar to that of Tyrannosaurus,[5] Persons et al. (2020) argued that greater femoral circumference indicates the greater capacity to withstand greater locomotor loads, not greater body mass.[6]
Classification
Skeletal diagram showing known elements of C. tashuikouensis
Hu considered Chilantaisaurus to be a carnosaur related to Allosaurus,[1] though some subsequent studies suggested that it may be a spinosauroid, possibly a primitive member of the spinosaurid family (Sereno, 1998; Chure, 2000; Rauhut, 2001) because it had large claws on the forelimbs thought to be unique to that group. Other studies suggested that it could be a member of an alternate offshoot of neotetanuran theropods, with some similarities to allosauroids, spinosauroids, and coelurosaurians.[7]
A 2009 study noted that it was difficult to rule out the possibility that Chilantaisaurus was the same animal as the carnosaur Shaochilong, which is from the same geological formation. However, they did note an enormous size difference between the two.[8] Further study by Benson, Carrano and Brusatte found that it was not as closely related to Shaochilong as first thought, but that it was a carnosaur (of the family Neovenatoridae), closely related to Allosaurus as Hu had initially thought.[2] Phylogenetic analysis published by Porfiri et al. in 2018 recovered Chilantaisaurus as a primitive coelurosaurian.[9]
Several species have been described based on very poor remains. The species "Chilantaisaurus" sibiricus (previously informally known as either Allosaurus? sibiricus or Antrodemus? sibiricus) is based on a single distal metatarsal discovered in 1915 in the Turginskaya Svita of the Buryat Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, Russia, dating to the Early Cretaceous periods (Berriasian to Hauterivian stages).[10][11][12] It is poorly described, so its relationships cannot be accurately determined (Chure, 2000) and its placement as a species of Chilantaisaurus is highly questionable. "Chilantaisaurus" maortuensis was reclassified as Shaochilong maortuensis in 2009.[8]
An additional species named in 1979, "Chilantaisaurus" zheziangensis, based on bones from the foot and a partial tibia,[13] is actually a therizinosaur taxon.[14][15]
The cladogram below follows a 2016 analysis by Sebastián Apesteguía, Nathan D. Smith, Rubén Juarez Valieri, and Peter J. Makovicky based on the dataset of Carrano et al. (2012).[16]
^ abBrusatte, S., Benson, R., Chure, D., Xu, X., Sullivan, C., and Hone, D. (2009). "The first definitive carcharodontosaurid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from Asia and the delayed ascent of tyrannosaurids." Naturwissenschaften, doi:10.1007/s00114-009-0565-2
^Juan D. Porfiri; Rubén D. Juárez Valieri; Domenica D.D. Santos; Matthew C. Lamanna (2018). "A new megaraptoran theropod dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Bajo de la Carpa Formation of northwestern Patagonia". Cretaceous Research. 89: 302–319. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2018.03.014. S2CID134117648.
^Riabinin, 1915. Zamtka o dinozavry ise Zabaykalya [A note on a dinosaur from the trans-Baikal region]. Trudy Geologichyeskago Muszeyah Imeni Petra Velikago Imperatorskoy Academiy Nauk. 8(5), 133-140.
^Weishampel, David B; et al. (2004). "Dinosaur distribution (Early Cretaceous, Asia)." In: Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; and Osmólska, Halszka (eds.): The Dinosauria, 2nd, Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 563-570. ISBN0-520-24209-2.
^Dong, Z. (1979). "Cretaceous dinosaur fossils in southern China". In Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; Nanjing Institute of Paleontology (eds.). Mesozoic and Cenozoic Redbeds in Southern China (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press. pp. 342–350. Translated paper
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.png){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
